SalarySwishSalarySwish

Creeping Depth by Metallica

Créé par: Krom
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 29 juin 2021
Publié: 29 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
I wanted to create a high quality 3rd line for the first time since Bill Berg, Mark Osborne and Peter Zezel in 1993-94. We've seen primising HEM line (Hyman-Engvall-Mikheyev) this year but they didn't last and I'm not willing to pay 5+ mil for Zach Hyman. I love Hyman, but everybody has a price. I tried to create a speedy, responsible 3rd line with some possibilities (e. g. Foligno instead of Robertson).

It was a joy to watch PIT's 3rd line a few years ago with Hagelin-Bonino-Kessel. That's why I penciled Robertson-Granlund-Nylander together.

Instead of Hyman we gave similar money to Saad who has a ring, and to keep his AAV low he gets an extra year.

With Nylander in the 3rd line, I put Marner next to JT. I believe he can help him to stay more productive and Matthews is good enough to play with less skilled wingers.

The asking price for Rakell during the TDL was 1st rd pick and prospect. At the end there was no bidding war, Rakell has struggled and he has one year remaining in his contract. Liljegren could be their young #6 d-man, with some luck maybe something better. He was a 1st round pick, Alex Kerfoot is a flexible forward who can play center or left wing. Anaheim could use him in the top six or they could trade him to another team at TDL. For the salary retention they received a 4th round pick.

Mikheyev has speed and penalty killing, but he is non-factor in the o-zone. Thanks to that I'm not willing to play him higher than 4th line and for the 4th line he is too expensive for Toronto. Same thing for Engvall. He is okay in d-zone, fine in transition thanks to his skating, but most of the time he is useless in o-zone.

I wanted to upgrade defense but it's not possible without trading one of the Big 4. It would be perfect to have Holl as a #6 and Bogo #7. So no Savard in the Leafs uniform. I would like to get at least someone like Stecher who is good at controlled zone exits, but he has 1.7 mil cap hit so maybe at TDL?

I'm not a big fan of Simmer because he would be okay as a 4th line RW, but that spot belongs to Spezza. Anyway I'm okay with him as a 13th forward and he is not going to play a full 82-game season. Same for Spezza. Last year Adam Brooks looked great as a 4th line center and he had some chemistry with Spezza and Thornton. Bunting is anything but proven, he had an unsustainable Sh% but his flashes of potential make him an intriguing UFA target (and Michael is only 25 yo). He even led the Coyotes in WAR, a metric that estimates the number of wins a player contributed to their respective team and he was not a defensive liability.

The last thing is Raanta. He played only 12 games last year and his Sv% wasn't good enough. Raanta is IR prone but he could be worth the risk in a 1A/1B role. I gave him half of his previous contract, he should be motivated to prove to everybody he is still a good goalie. There is no doubt he is better than Rittich. The only issue is his health. But I guess - as a GM - I would know if he could be back and start the new season healthy. Worth a risk?

That's it. Be nice, let me know what you think in the comments and stay safe. ;)
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
22 250 000 $
43 500 000 $
44 500 000 $
22 125 000 $
11 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
SEA
  1. Dermott, Travis
Détails additionnels:
- expansion draft -
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (DET)
3.
TOR
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (LAK)
4.
TOR
  1. Rakell, Rickard (1 894 722 $ retained)
ANA
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
  2. Liljegren, Timothy
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de LAK
Logo de TOR
Logo de DET
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $79 514 867 $0 $0 $1 985 133 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
568 417 $568 417 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
G
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

29 juin 2021 à 12 h 13
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 5,590
Mentions "j'aime": 3,002
Detroit have no use for Engvall.
29 juin 2021 à 12 h 16
#2
PlusMinus is stupid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 7,319
Mentions "j'aime": 7,154
Detroit will never want Engvall
29 juin 2021 à 12 h 16
#3
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 4,073
Mentions "j'aime": 3,511
Quoting: Billy12Bob
Detroit have no use for Engvall.


Think this could be an "any team" scenario.
29 juin 2021 à 12 h 19
#4
Trad Breliving
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,492
Mentions "j'aime": 1,989
I do really like this team.

The only worry I have is that it’s a 20 man roster.
29 juin 2021 à 12 h 20
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,723
Mentions "j'aime": 6,219
Good song.
Voir tout