SalarySwishSalarySwish

Monahan

Créé par: Alfie11
Équipe: 2021-22 Golden Knights de Vegas
Date de création initiale: 9 juin 2021
Publié: 11 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Vegas wants a top six C and has a winger that fits Calgary’s needs and deserves a bigger role. Not really fussed about whatever else should be added, this is to show fit. I personally think Monahan has more value (top six C > 3RW) but I don’t really care if you think otherwise, the value isn’t far off either way. See my previous post for what Calgary’s team could look like with Tuch. This is to show that Vegas can make the cap work and still have a great team. Yes they’re over but I’ll say why this isn’t a problem below.

Vegas is gonna be cap strapped regardless this summer, but they can afford to take on a little cap by swapping Tuch for Monahan and solidifying their top 6. They’ll have to let Martinez walk (honestly something that’ll have to happen anyway tbh, I imagine someone gives him 5+) and won’t really be able to bring in anyone else new above a league min deal, but that’s what happens when you have two Norris contenders, two Vezina contenders, and arguably the best top six in the league. Top line adds Monahan, bumping Stephenson. 2nd line remains the same. Their 4th line remains largely the same, with Carrier and Reaves on the flanks, but I reckon Roy slides down between them unless Nosek resigns for league min (probably gonna have to let him walk). Their 3rd line features Stephenson now, and Cody Glass should make the team full time next year. He can play 3LW with Stephenson up the middle to ease in, but he can probably handle 3C and Vegas will want him at C long term, especially as Krebs projects as more of an elite winger according to some recent reports I’ve read. The last lineup spot (3RW) I’ve given to Kolesar here, but Vegas has plenty of young guys ready to try and earn a spot. I’d bet Krebs and Elvenes get serious looks next year, and while I think Dugan is still a year out, he could push for some time too. On D they’re kinda stuck, they can’t afford to keep Martinez so their top 4 will get a little weaker, at least until the TDL where decent players become extremely affordable after double retention, but with Theo and Petro carrying they should be just fine. I’m also a big fan of Hague and Whitecloud, I think that’s a fantastic young 3rd pair, and one of em might be ready to step into the top 4 next year anyway (pushing Holden down, Theo can slide back to the left if it’s Whitecloud). They’ll probably sign a veteran 6/7 guy to a league min deal for one of the scratches.

They’ll also probably run a 22-man roster to save a little cap, but they’re only barely over with 23 here. All 3 guys I have as scratches right now are mainly to show that I think they could compete for a spot but will fall just short and wind up in the AHL. When you replace Krebs or Dugan with a league min scratch it brings them below the cap. Wouldn’t surprise me if they run a 22-man roster with a veteran F and veteran D on league min as the scratches (all 3 kids sent to the AHL), doesn’t really matter who, and this scenario puts them roughly a mil under the cap, allowing for a pretty sizable splash at the TDL, likely with a D rental. Anyway, I think this is a way for Vegas to improve their top 6 by adding a good centre, and without losing any depth as Stephenson is a perfectly capable 3rd liner on a good deal and they’ve got young guys for days that are ready to step in. Worst case scenario they can afford to pay Seattle to retain on Monahan for 2 years lol
Transactions
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de VGK
Logo de NJD
Logo de WPG
Logo de CAR
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
2022
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de VAN
Logo de WPG
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
2023
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $78 080 772 $285 772 $2 222 500 $3 419 228 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
725 000 $725 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
8 800 000 $8 800 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
5 200 000 $5 200 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
725 000 $725 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
791 667 $791 667 $
DG
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance412 500 $$412K)
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
776 667 $776 667 $ (Bonis de performance110 000 $$110K)
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

11 juin 2021 à 1 h 17
#1
Rangers 2023
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,043
Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
Vegas declines this
11 juin 2021 à 1 h 22
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
Vegas declines this

I guess you didn’t even read until the second sentence huh. Thanks for also not explaining how a 3rd line winger with precisely one season above a 50 point pace is more valuable than a top 6 C that consistently scores 30 goals.
11 juin 2021 à 1 h 25
#3
Rangers 2023
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,043
Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
Quoting: Alfie11
I guess you didn’t even read until the second sentence huh. Thanks for also not explaining how a 3rd line winger with precisely one season above a 50 point pace is more valuable than a top 6 C that consistently scores 30 goals.


Rookie season
Season scoring 50
Injured
No training camp and preseason with shortened offseason and on pace for 49 points while on the 3rd line which you didn't fail to mention

50 points isn't the deciding factor on a players value, everyone knows Tuch is a top 6 forward, vegas just has elite depth, and Stephenson has been just fine for vegas
11 juin 2021 à 1 h 35
#4
Isles7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 12,222
Mentions "j'aime": 5,299
Quoting: Alfie11
I guess you didn’t even read until the second sentence huh. Thanks for also not explaining how a 3rd line winger with precisely one season above a 50 point pace is more valuable than a top 6 C that consistently scores 30 goals.

Tuch is a lot better than a 3rd line winger. He just plays on a stacked Vegas team. Monahan has been pretty bad for the past two seasons.

11 juin 2021 à 1 h 57
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
Rookie season
Season scoring 50
Injured
No training camp and preseason with shortened offseason and on pace for 49 points while on the 3rd line which you didn't fail to mention

50 points isn't the deciding factor on a players value, everyone knows Tuch is a top 6 forward, vegas just has elite depth, and Stephenson has been just fine for vegas

Monahan jumped into the league directly after the draft and had 7 straight 20 goal years. At some point the pure numbers do matter, they’re the thing needed to win after all. And yeah, he’s a top 6 forward stuck on the 3rd line, stuck in the 50 point range (also I said pace, other than his 50 point year he’s never even been on pace to hit 50pts in a full season any other year) but what’s more valuable to Vegas—a 1C or a 3RW? They can afford to use their depth to address an area of weakness.

Quoting: Isles777
Tuch is a lot better than a 3rd line winger. He just plays on a stacked Vegas team. Monahan has been pretty bad for the past two seasons.


Yeah, he’s been great in his role, which is why I want him, he could get more opportunity on Calgary. He’s at the very least a good 2RW imo, stuck being a high end 3RW in Vegas with no hope of progression. Maybe he even has higher potential than good 2RW (high end 2RW? Low end 1RW?), but we won’t know until he gets a shot. Even valuing him as a good 2RW (underlyings are great but you need to convert to show they mean something, which yes he hasn’t had the opportunity to do, but that doesn’t take much from the fact that he hasn’t done it, so I think it’s difficult to value him higher than that at this point), I think giving a low end 1C/high end 2C is a pretty reasonable offer. 19-20 was a down year for Monahan and he still scored 20 in a shortened season. This year he’s been playing through a hip injury. Not everyone has to be excellent at everything (Monahan’s weakness is obviously defense, but he did improve in that area under Sutter and would hypothetically be playing with the best defensive player in the league so), sometimes being money in the bank 20 goals and a consistent threat for 30 is good enough, that’s not easy to find, especially up the middle, top 6 centres rarely move. It addresses an area of need for Vegas in the middle in the top 6 by sacrificing strength at a much easier to fill position (several ELCs ready to step into Tuch’s role on the 3rd line soon). I think it’s a pretty solid basis for a trade. Not to mention, they’re less than a year apart in age so it’s not like Tuch has boundless amounts of upside because he’s so much younger, he’s 25 and Monahan’s 26 lol
Voir tout