SalarySwishSalarySwish

Reaching on the rebuild

Créé par: Klara
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 26 févr. 2021
Publié: 26 févr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Keep in mind this scenario is very much a REACH, and is more a general idea of who goes where and what should be desired in return.
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Newhook, Alex [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (COL)
COL
  1. Hertl, Tomas (2 812 000 $ retained)
2.
SJS
  1. Honka, Anttoni [Liste de réserve]
  2. Suzuki, Ryan
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (CAR)
Détails additionnels:
Or just Jarvis lol
3.
SJS
  1. Alexeyev, Alexander
Détails additionnels:
or a 2nd/3rd if Dubnyk plays well.

Not sure what Alexeyev's value is right now, so picks also an option.
WSH
  1. Dubnyk, Devan (1 083 333 $ retained)
4.
SJS
  1. Gostisbehere, Shayne
  2. York, Cam [Liste de réserve]
PHI
  1. Blichfeld, Joachim
  2. Burns, Brent (4 000 000 $ retained)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de CAR
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $68 323 666 $0 $642 500 $13 176 334 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
735 000 $735 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (425 000 $$425K425 000 $$425K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
723 333 $723 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

26 févr. 2021 à 13 h 45
#1
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,090
Mentions "j'aime": 12,832
I’d like a small add to the Hertl deal but it’s fair obvi

Meier deal I don’t love but it’s not bad - I just rather a different set of prospect/ deal

But that Philly one ain’t happening York is gonna be real damn good - nothing we can do to acquire him unless you do: Meier for York and a first/ pick
Klara a aimé ceci.
26 févr. 2021 à 13 h 51
#2
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,685
Mentions "j'aime": 1,881
Quoting: yikes
I’d like a small add to the Hertl deal but it’s fair obvi

Meier deal I don’t love but it’s not bad - I just rather a different set of prospect/ deal

But that Philly one ain’t happening York is gonna be real damn good


really conflicted on the Philly idea, because I think there is a good chance a team will try and pickup Burns 50% retained at the deadline, and Philadelphia just seems like the obvious destination (where Burns will accept a trade to).

Looking around, York is ranked almost equally to Merkley in most publications, so I figured it was around good value, obviously not sure if PHI would be willing to depart from him, but SJ needs more LD prospects, and York is a perfect fit.
26 févr. 2021 à 13 h 54
#3
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,090
Mentions "j'aime": 12,832
Quoting: Klara
really conflicted on the Philly idea, because I think there is a good chance a team will try and pickup Burns 50% retained at the deadline, and Philadelphia just seems like the obvious destination (where Burns will accept a trade to).

Looking around, York is ranked almost equally to Merkley in most publications, so I figured it was around good value, obviously not sure if PHI would be willing to depart from him, but SJ needs more LD prospects, and York is a perfect fit.


I’d love to see York over in teal but Burns’ age/ contract length negate a real chunk of value. If he is moved whether Seattle or wherever I think that trade is to unpredictable as not many teams will inquire on him and personally I don’t see an elite level prospect being moved is all. That’s just me but as I said I think it’s too unpredictable so I could be right or wrong.

I think Philly just has to many money worries of their own to take on burns. But hey if they did offer burns 50% for York I think I’d take them up on it haha.
26 févr. 2021 à 14 h 4
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: yikes
I’d like a small add to the Hertl deal but it’s fair obvi

Meier deal I don’t love but it’s not bad - I just rather a different set of prospect/ deal

But that Philly one ain’t happening York is gonna be real damn good - nothing we can do to acquire him unless you do: Meier for York and a first/ pick


Hertl only having 1 year left on his deal before UFA is tough to move Newhook for. You really are only getting him for the rest of his contract bc no way they can afford to keep him.
IMO newhook is only moved in a long term piece trade. Value is probably close but the logic behind the trade I just dont fully see it for the avs as Newhook is the only realistic long term 2C option Avs have once kadris contract is done. If you arent getting a replacement to fill hat void then its going to make a very big hole in the roster
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
26 févr. 2021 à 14 h 7
#5
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,090
Mentions "j'aime": 12,832
Quoting: coga16
Hertl only having 1 year left on his deal before UFA is tough to move Newhook for. You really are only getting him for the rest of his contract bc no way they can afford to keep him.
IMO newhook is only moved in a long term piece trade. Value is probably close but the logic behind the trade I just dont fully see it for the avs.


Well it’s for this playoffs and next, and the team has many other prospects so I don’t see a hole created. I don’t see how it’s not fair because timmins + others aren’t worth it for the sharks. I think logic is there as Hertl comes at just above a 2m aav and and allows for plenty of cap flexibility for cup contender who’s adding a top 6 player; which is a very rare chance to get. Hertl also could extended but even then you’ve still got nearly 2 years to figure that out/ 1.5 y; if not win 1-2 cups while still being able to make other moves during since Hertl once again only costs 2m.
Voir tout