SalarySwishSalarySwish

Who pens shouldve got for Kessel

Créé par: mhockey91
Équipe: 2020-21 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 19 févr. 2021
Publié: 19 févr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Obviously this is in a vacuum. With Garland we may not get Zucker or Kap. Like I said, just for fun
Transactions
PIT
  1. Garland, Conor
Détails additionnels:
With hindsight obviously garland would’ve been a way better get than Galchenyuk, but at the time Galchenyuk definitely had more promise so I understand GMJR decision there. Whatever it’s just for fun
ARI
    Alex Galchenyuk
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de ANA
    2022
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    2023
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $74 220 175 $0 $1 912 500 $7 279 825 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    2 940 000 $2 940 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    700 000 $700 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    DG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
    DG
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    700 000 $700 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    700 000 $700 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    Équipe de réserve
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    1 200 000 $1 200 000 $ (125 000 $$125K125 000 $$125K)
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    733 333 $733 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    C, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    G
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner

    Commentaires populaires

    19 févr. 2021 à 11 h 20
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 3,554
    Mentions "j'aime": 611
    Garland is one of the best contracts in the league. Would have been a great return for Phil.
    mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
    19 févr. 2021 à 11 h 21
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 219
    Mentions "j'aime": 30
    As someone who's been on the Garland band wagon since he was passed over in his draft year, I'm very happy with his play. He should've gone that year, but undersized (He was listed at 5'8 although he is now 5'10) and not an elite skater, he got passed over. Next year he dominated the Q, and went 5th round despite his comparables for such a large growth being players like Mark Stone. Even at the time of the Kessel trade, rookie Garland had 13G 5A 18P in 43 GP, but did it in very limited minutes, and had shown his ability to get to the netfront despite his size in the NHL, and was above a point per game in the AHL as a U23 player (very good indicator). People always just sleep on the smaller players who lack elite separation speed until they prove it as dominant NHL players. One i'm hoping for to prove people like this now is Robertson, who should've gone around 20th in his draft and fell to 53rd because of size mixed with speed concerns.
    19 févr. 2021 à 11 h 23
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 15,921
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
    Quoting: Leafs_Storm
    As someone who's been on the Garland band wagon since he was passed over in his draft year, I'm very happy with his play.


    He’s really improved
    19 févr. 2021 à 11 h 26
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 219
    Mentions "j'aime": 30
    Quoting: mhockey91
    He’s really improved


    Clicked enter early, but the whole post was supposed to say "As someone who's been on the Garland band wagon since he was passed over in his draft year, I'm very happy with his play. He should've gone that year, but undersized (He was listed at 5'8 although he is now 5'10) and not an elite skater, he got passed over. Next year he dominated the Q, and went 5th round despite his comparables for such a large growth being players like Mark Stone. Even at the time of the Kessel trade, rookie Garland had 13G 5A 18P in 43 GP, but did it in very limited minutes, and had shown his ability to get to the netfront despite his size in the NHL, and was above a point per game in the AHL as a U23 player (very good indicator). People always just sleep on the smaller players who lack elite separation speed until they prove it as dominant NHL players. One i'm hoping for to prove people like this now is Robertson, who should've gone around 20th in his draft and fell to 53rd because of size mixed with speed concerns."
    19 févr. 2021 à 12 h 53
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 2,148
    Mentions "j'aime": 367
    This trade was the beginning of the end for the Pens run.

    Galchenyuk was such a bad miss. Garland was pretty unknown at this point but yes in hindsight this would have been nice. Really good player now.

    If I was doing the trade I would have been trying for Garland, Dvorak or Hinostroza. Dvorak had 7 points in 20 games that year but was a good prospect. Hinostroza had same amount of points as Galchenyuk in same amount of games.

    Others could have been Crouse and Chychryn but then it would be unlikely to get POJ as well.
    Voir tout