SalarySwishSalarySwish

My 3C pick

Créé par: PGHBOB69
Équipe: 2020-21 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 9 déc. 2020
Publié: 9 déc. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Besides Cirelli or if we could afford J.Staal again or someone crazy that would hate playing 3C minutes or we couldn’t afford.

Dallas gets their LHD that is ready to play with Heiskanen. I know they have Harley but PO-Joseph is definitely farther along. And Dallas moves Ty Dellandrea or J.Dickinson to 3C.
Transactions
DAL
  1. Joseph, Pierre-Olivier
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $79 856 842 $0 $850 000 $1 643 158 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 940 000 $2 940 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

9 déc. 2020 à 21 h 35
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 853
Mentions "j'aime": 161
Holy over payment my lord
gmgb a aimé ceci.
9 déc. 2020 à 21 h 45
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,330
Mentions "j'aime": 454
Modifié 9 déc. 2020 à 22 h 3
Quoting: Grusofsky96
Holy over payment my lord


I don’t think so. It’s what we paid for Zucker. A top 100 prospect( although C.Addison is a more sought after defender being RH and a bit more highly rated). A top 100 prospect and a 1st round pick. Of course Zucker > Faska. But they are different players too. I mean we paid a 1st round pick and Hallander( a “C+, “B-“ prospect) for Kappy too. And it was a known, 15th overall pick. Pretty high.

Faska is a great 2-way Center. Perfect for our 3C. Signed long term to a reasonable deal. That’s very valuable. Still young!! Still potential there!! That’s valuable. 1st round pedigree. valuable(whether u think so or not, it is). Chips in on offense enough. Perfect IMO. And I agree u can never have enough D, and I love PO-Joseph. I just don’t see where he fits now with Matheson.
9 déc. 2020 à 21 h 50
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 853
Mentions "j'aime": 161
Quoting: PGHBOB69
I don’t think so. It’s what we paid for Zucker. A top 100 prospect( although C.Addison is a more sought after defender being RH and a bit more highly rated). A top 100 prospect and a 1st round pick. Of course Zucker > Faska. But they are different players too. I mean we paid a 1st round pick and Hallander( a “C+, “B-“ prospect) for Kappy too. And it was a known, 15th overall pick. Pretty high. Faska is a great 2-way Center. Perfect for our 3C. Signed long term to a reasonable deal. That’s very valuable. Still young!! Still potential there!! That’s valuable. 1st round pedigree. valuable(whether u think so or not, it is). Chips in on offense enough. Perfect IMO. And I agree u can never have enough D, and I love PO-Joseph. I just don’t see where he fits now with Matheson.


Faksa just hasn’t really proven himself for me to feel comfortable giving up a 1st. Giving up a 1st for Zucker and Kapanen is fine cause they’re top 6 guys. JR wants Jankowski at 3C. Hate how no one is giving him a chance
PGHBOB69 et mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
9 déc. 2020 à 21 h 55
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,330
Mentions "j'aime": 454
Modifié 10 déc. 2020 à 0 h 9
Quoting: Grusofsky96
Faksa just hasn’t really proven himself for me to feel comfortable giving up a 1st. Giving up a 1st for Zucker and Kapanen is fine cause they’re top 6 guys. JR wants Jankowski at 3C. Hate how no one is giving him a chance


Yep, I agree. It’s Janko position to lose right now. And I think he can can turn it around. We’re only his 2nd team. 1st round pedigree too. 2 descent seasons his 1st two years. Yes, last year was bad but Calgary was a sh*t show last year. Every players stats went way down. It’s easy to write off last year for him. And a change of scenery should do him well.

But Faksa is definitely proven 3C. Has gotten Selke votes 3 years Out of 5 he’s been n the NHL. Chips in scoring enough. I disagree there.
9 déc. 2020 à 22 h 30
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 7,659
Mentions "j'aime": 5,244
Quoting: Grusofsky96
Holy over payment my lord


Gotta agree. A 1st and one of PIT's only decent prospects is way too much to pay for a 3C right now.

Quoting: PGHBOB69

But Faksa is definitely proven 3C. Has gotten Selke votes 3 years Out of 5 he’s been n the NHL. Chips in scoring enough. I disagree there.


Just wanted to point out this isn't accurate. Faksa finished 7th in Selke voting in 17-18, and received a single 4th place vote the next year, but that's been it.

https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/f/faksara01.html
Voir tout