SalarySwishSalarySwish

Pens 2021-22

Créé par: PGHBOB69
Équipe: 2021-22 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 3 déc. 2020
Publié: 3 déc. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Tanev is taken by Seattle in the expansion draft.

Pens Sign Marino long-term. 5 years, 21M , 4.2M per
Pens sign Blueger 4 years, 6M. 1.5M per
Pens sign ZAR 3 years, 4M. 1.33M per

Pens Sign UFA M.Johansson to a 3 year, 9M deal, 3M per year.

Pens sign UFA Joel Armia to a a 2 year 3.5M contract. 1.75 per year

Pens sign UFA M.Pysyk to a 2 year 2.5M deal. 1.25M per year.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 330 000 $
2875 000 $
3825 000 $
2825 000 $
24 200 000 $
2875 000 $
2775 000 $
41 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 000 000 $
21 750 000 $
21 250 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $79 800 175 $0 $0 $1 699 825 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 940 000 $2 940 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 330 000 $1 330 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 200 000 $4 200 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

3 déc. 2020 à 13 h 6
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Why do so many have Tanev as the guy taken by Seattle. I like the player, but 3.5 for a guy who can't crack 20 goals is gonna make Seattle pass him up. I know he brings more, I'm a fan of his game. But that contract won't be one they want.

If he plays well Matheson is the guy they take as he'll be the most valuable. Of course he has to turn it around first. If he doesn't I'm thinking they take ZAR. Blueger maybe protected not sure what they do yet. The 7th forward is either him or McCann. If McCann is still here. But if Blueger isn't protected, I'm about sure he's gone to Seattle unless they make a deal. If they make a deal, you can bet it's Matheson.
3 déc. 2020 à 21 h 14
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,330
Mentions "j'aime": 454
Modifié 3 déc. 2020 à 21 h 21
Quoting: pharrow
Why do so many have Tanev as the guy taken by Seattle. I like the player, but 3.5 for a guy who can't crack 20 goals is gonna make Seattle pass him up. I know he brings more, I'm a fan of his game. But that contract won't be one they want.

If he plays well Matheson is the guy they take as he'll be the most valuable. Of course he has to turn it around first. If he doesn't I'm thinking they take ZAR. Blueger maybe protected not sure what they do yet. The 7th forward is either him or McCann. If McCann is still here. But if Blueger isn't protected, I'm about sure he's gone to Seattle unless they make a deal. If they make a deal, you can bet it's Matheson.


They have to hit a cap floor too. Tanev has had Selke votes 3 years in a row. Even b4 he came to Pittsburgh. Yes, 3.5M is tough for a 29 year old bottom 6 energy guy. But in a flat cap year. If the cap situation did what it was supposed to do this year(and the fans were able to attend games), then the contract is an ok one. Actually a good one. Not great, but good. Defiantly not bad like it is now In a flat cap situation.

I don’t know why I think they will take Tanev. I just think they will. They will want his defense, energy, leadership, etc. And he’ll chip in with double digit goals and 30 points. But you know he’s not a huge scorer or playmaker. Average shot. Average passer. But He’s smart, fast, does the right things, is always in the right spot, plays tough, digs pucks out, great positioning, hits a lot of people, and obviously great defensive(one of the best in the league). And his analytics win coaches/GM’s over more than his scoring stats.
3 déc. 2020 à 21 h 24
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: PGHBOB69
They have to hit a cap floor too. Tanev has had Selke votes 3 years in a row. Even b4 he came to Pittsburgh. Yes, 3.5M is tough for a 29 year old bottom 6 energy guy. But in a flat cap year. If the cap situation did what it was supposed to do this year(and the fans were able to attend games), then the contract is an ok one. Actually a good one. Not great, but good. Defiantly not bad like it is now In a flat cap situation. I don’t know why I think they will take Tanev. I just think they will. They will want his defense, energy, leadership. And he’ll chip in with double digit goals and 30 points. But you know he’s not a huge scorer or playmaker. Average shot. Average passer. But He’s smart, fast, does the right things, is always in the right spot, good positioning, plays tough, digs pucks out, hits a lot of people, and obviously great defensive(one of the best in the league). And his analytics win coaches/GM’s over more than his scoring stats.


yes I realize all this about his game. Like I said, I like his game. But if Matheson has a good year, he's the better pick. As a guy who can play 2LD is more valuable than a bottom 6 forward.
Especially if you can trade him out to a team needing defensive help after. And even if he doesn't turn it around, they can use that 3.5 million to collect a 1st round pick. Which is why I don't see this happening. But we'll have to see what Blueger or ZAR make.
3 déc. 2020 à 21 h 30
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,330
Mentions "j'aime": 454
Quoting: pharrow
yes I realize all this about his game. Like I said, I like his game. But if Matheson has a good year, he's the better pick. As a guy who can play 2LD is more valuable than a bottom 6 forward.
Especially if you can trade him out to a team needing defensive help after. And even if he doesn't turn it around, they can use that 3.5 million to collect a 1st round pick. Which is why I don't see this happening. But we'll have to see what Blueger or ZAR make.


The draft is b4 free agency starts. They will draft Blueger or ZAR’s RFA rights. It’s why they can draft an UFA from someone’s team too. It’s like trading a UFA rights after the season and b4 free agency starts. Same concept.

But I agree, they would draft Matheson if he has a good year. Or Blueger I’d he has a good year(b/c he’s a center). But they have to have good years in order for that to happen. If they have average years or a bad year. They will take Tanev, IMO.
3 déc. 2020 à 22 h 32
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: PGHBOB69
The draft is b4 free agency starts. They will draft Blueger or ZAR’s RFA rights. It’s why they can draft an UFA from someone’s team too. It’s like trading a UFA rights after the season and b4 free agency starts. Same concept.

But I agree, they would draft Matheson if he has a good year. Or Blueger I’d he has a good year(b/c he’s a center). But they have to have good years in order for that to happen. If they have average years or a bad year. They will take Tanev, IMO.


I get that on the RFAs but what I was trying to get at is, you got ZAR who is basically the same defensive forward, who is much younger and his cap hit, potentially is a lot lower.
Which is what I was referring to in see what Blueger and ZAR make. Because if you can take ZAR at like 1 million, and then you use your cap to take dumps and take 1st round picks. You are probably better off than taking Tanev. Who is older, about to be 29 and way more expensive. I guess that depends on when they expect to compete. If they think they are gonna be like vegas and compete right away ok. But if this team isn't going to be competitive and have to build, than taking a guy who's 30 at a high salary just makes no sense to me.

I don't know, Seattle is in a good spot to take up cap space, rake in 1st round picks and build for the future.
I see them either grabbing young guys they can make use of, cap dumps, or guys they can trade for assets. But if they are building to win that's a different story to me.
Voir tout