SalarySwishSalarySwish

They call me Trouba, Jacob Trouba.

Créé par: UltramanTaro
Équipe: 2016-17 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 25 sept. 2016
Publié: 25 sept. 2016
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
66 000 000 $
Transactions
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2017 (WPG)
Détails additionnels:
Rights to Jacob Trouba
WPG
  1. Hjalmarsson, Niklas
  2. Krüger, Marcus
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2017 (CHI)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2017
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de WPG
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CAR
Logo de STL
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de ANA
2018
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2019
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2373 000 000 $63 377 420 $3 070 000 $4 525 000 $9 622 580 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
5 275 000 $5 275 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 5
812 500 $812 500 $ (Bonis de performance2 575 000 $$3M)
AG
UFA - 1
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
575 000 $575 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
AD, C
UFA - 3
875 000 $875 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
575 000 $575 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
C
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
575 000 $575 000 $
C
UFA - 1
625 000 $625 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 8
587 500 $587 500 $
G
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
825 000 $825 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
600 000 $600 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

25 sept. 2016 à 21 h 57
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,729
Mentions "j'aime": 288
Hjalmarsson would be a great acquisition for the Jets in exchange for Trouba. And to rid themselves of the Kruger overpayment would be great for the Hawks. I would do this trade in a heartbeat! 6x6 may be too much at this point tho. Trouba might be quite a player at some point but he is very young and a bit unproven at this stage. If he truly wants out for playing reasons and not paying reasons, $4.5-5.0M should be sufficient for 4 years or so. I would not include another first rounder to Winnipeg, tho, especially when Chicago hosts the draft next year. Trouba and a third for the Swedes would be more than adequate. Don't wait on this one, Bowman!!
26 sept. 2016 à 10 h 47
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 1,148
Mentions "j'aime": 199
Trading 2 very good assets for one and only getting $1,000,000 in cap relief? That is useless to the Hawks and the exact opposite of what they need to do. They need to drop big contracts and acquire more players will lighter contracts.
26 sept. 2016 à 10 h 51
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,677
Mentions "j'aime": 6,811
Quoting: Hockeyplayer1
Trading 2 very good assets for one and only getting $1,000,000 in cap relief? That is useless to the Hawks and the exact opposite of what they need to do. They need to drop big contracts and acquire more players will lighter contracts.


I kind of agree here. I know Hjalmarsson is no Doughty but he is no slouch either. Kruger is by far not worth his contract but he still has value and can be traded for picks. Plus losing yet another 1st rounder. WPG would easily take this trade but if I were Chicago, I'd want to make absolutely sure this makes sense long term. Technically speaking the team got worse after this trade.
26 sept. 2016 à 14 h 7
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,729
Mentions "j'aime": 288
Quoting: Hockeyplayer1
Trading 2 very good assets for one and only getting $1,000,000 in cap relief? That is useless to the Hawks and the exact opposite of what they need to do. They need to drop big contracts and acquire more players will lighter contracts.
Just curious, who do they trade then? Sharp and his $5.9M hit was sent packing along with Johns in a trade that did nothing for Chicago. Ultimately, Pittsburgh wound up being the beneficiary! Seabrook was the real winner, signing his retirement deal shortly thereafter. You know, the opposite of what they need to do. The question might be is a trade of a "big" ever going to favor Chicago, short and long term? Can they win with the same core group as they all get older (and fatter in the wallet)? Could playing a RHD on the right side on all three lines (and vice versa) allow for better north-south play? What impact of losing both Hjalmarsson and Kruger have on the PK as well as other areas chemistry-wise? Or can they be replaced without that much loss?

Trouba obviously wants out. He desires a bigger role wherever he plays. What might his actually salary demands be as a young guy just coming off his ELC? He may want 6x6 or whatever yet is he that much of an impact player (as in Eckblad's case)?
Voir tout