SalarySwishSalarySwish

deadline deals

Créé par: bigmikewall
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 22 nov. 2019
Publié: 23 nov. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Description of all trades:

Gustafsson's value is not what used to be. Schnarr is a good prospect and the pick is of fair value.

Sikura is a likely trade candidate purely cause Colliton has a hatred for any of the players that Coach Q liked. A reunion between the two helps Q find some solid cheap depth for the next couple of years.

I don't think Caggs will be resigned. He is a good gritty player but the Blackhawks will likely not tender him a qualifying offer so might as well get some value out of him. The Avs make sense as they have a league low in hits and have been struggling with the injury bug.

Lmk what you think and what moves should be made. The main thing I think should happen is Colliton being replaced. His system sucks and he constantly clashes with the players in the locker room.
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (COL)
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (FLA)
3.
CHI
  1. Schnarr, Nathan
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (ARI)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de FLA
Logo de CHI
Logo de COL
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de ARI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $66 620 853 $0 $7 557 500 $14 879 147 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
700 000 $700 000 $
D
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

23 nov. 2019 à 14 h 36
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,295
Mentions "j'aime": 9,751
In the last 5 games Gus has 3 goals. His value is increasing back to where it was despite a slow start to the season for him.

Caggs is worth more then a 5th. He's versatile and able to play up and down the lineup, that kind of player is worth a lot more then a 5th at the TDL. He's a better version of Hartman who got a 1st. Caggs is at least a 3rd.

Maatta or De Haan needs to go. The Hawks are too deep with defensive prospects next year and Holm, McCoshen both look really good in Rockford not to mention Gilbert, Mitchell, both being options next year. Koekko should also get traded, highly doubt we re-sign him.

With the bonuses this year, the Hawks are going to need to move pieces besides low cap hits like Gus and Caggs.
23 nov. 2019 à 15 h 44
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 640
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: ChiHawk
In the last 5 games Gus has 3 goals. His value is increasing back to where it was despite a slow start to the season for him.

Caggs is worth more then a 5th. He's versatile and able to play up and down the lineup, that kind of player is worth a lot more then a 5th at the TDL. He's a better version of Hartman who got a 1st. Caggs is at least a 3rd.

Maatta or De Haan needs to go. The Hawks are too deep with defensive prospects next year and Holm, McCoshen both look really good in Rockford not to mention Gilbert, Mitchell, both being options next year. Koekko should also get traded, highly doubt we re-sign him.

With the bonuses this year, the Hawks are going to need to move pieces besides low cap hits like Gus and Caggs.


A deep draft this year. I don’t think GM’s will be as eager to part with their 1st as in your example with Hartman. Gus will need to go on a tear until the TDL to be at the perceived level he was at last year. Too inconsistent too risky for a GM to part with their 1st. I think a third and a prospect is fair value. An upgrade to 2nd if Gus is signed.
23 nov. 2019 à 17 h 25
#3
bigmikewall
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 167
Mentions "j'aime": 36
Quoting: ChiHawk
In the last 5 games Gus has 3 goals. His value is increasing back to where it was despite a slow start to the season for him.

Caggs is worth more then a 5th. He's versatile and able to play up and down the lineup, that kind of player is worth a lot more then a 5th at the TDL. He's a better version of Hartman who got a 1st. Caggs is at least a 3rd.

Maatta or De Haan needs to go. The Hawks are too deep with defensive prospects next year and Holm, McCoshen both look really good in Rockford not to mention Gilbert, Mitchell, both being options next year. Koekko should also get traded, highly doubt we re-sign him.

With the bonuses this year, the Hawks are going to need to move pieces besides low cap hits like Gus and Caggs.


I agree we could get more for Caggs for more but one question is his durability with his play style (has been in concussion protocol 3 times in the last 14 months). You could argue a 4th and maybe even a 3rd but for now I would say or 4th or 5th for caggs.

As for Gustafsson here is the problem. His offense is offset by his awful Defense. He makes awful plays and usually leads to goals against. In the past 4 games I can recall 3 goals he is responsible for and a ton of other chances he has given up. If a team trades for him then they'll need a partner for him to be defensively sound ie the Coyotes who have some nice defensive defenseman. I understand sometimes teams will pay a good amount for a player at the deadline to make a playoff push but Arizona won't be giving up a lot for him. I think this deal gives the Blackhawks a chance to grab a solid B prospect and pick for a guy who will leave this summer.

I agree with you Koekkoek and Maatta have got to go. A guy like Mitchell needs to be in the lineup next year. I think the defensive core goes:

Keith-Mitchell
De Haan-Seabrook
Murphy-Boqvist
23 nov. 2019 à 18 h 21
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,295
Mentions "j'aime": 9,751
Quoting: Hawksince71
A deep draft this year. I don’t think GM’s will be as eager to part with their 1st as in your example with Hartman. Gus will need to go on a tear until the TDL to be at the perceived level he was at last year. Too inconsistent too risky for a GM to part with their 1st. I think a third and a prospect is fair value. An upgrade to 2nd if Gus is signed.


Which is why there is a happy medium between Hartman getting a 1st and you suggesting a 5th so suggesting a 3rd.

And that's why I don't have Gus getting a 1st back like the Hawks were offered at the TDL last year by multiple teams according to insider reports, but to suggest his value has tanked wouldn't be accurate either.
23 nov. 2019 à 18 h 24
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,295
Mentions "j'aime": 9,751
Quoting: bigmikewall
I agree we could get more for Caggs for more but one question is his durability with his play style (has been in concussion protocol 3 times in the last 14 months). You could argue a 4th and maybe even a 3rd but for now I would say or 4th or 5th for caggs.

As for Gustafsson here is the problem. His offense is offset by his awful Defense. He makes awful plays and usually leads to goals against. In the past 4 games I can recall 3 goals he is responsible for and a ton of other chances he has given up. If a team trades for him then they'll need a partner for him to be defensively sound ie the Coyotes who have some nice defensive defenseman. I understand sometimes teams will pay a good amount for a player at the deadline to make a playoff push but Arizona won't be giving up a lot for him. I think this deal gives the Blackhawks a chance to grab a solid B prospect and pick for a guy who will leave this summer.

I agree with you Koekkoek and Maatta have got to go. A guy like Mitchell needs to be in the lineup next year. I think the defensive core goes:

Keith-Mitchell
De Haan-Seabrook
Murphy-Boqvist


Caggs I believe has been in concussion protocol twice in the last 14 months, but could be wrong.

Regarding Gus, he's not as bad as everyone thinks defensively. He's not good by any means but he's not awful. Seabs is just as bad as an example but Seabs doesn't have the offensive side. While some fans are saying he gave up 2 goals against Carolina and think that is totally not accurate...1 yes but the other was clearly on Keith
Voir tout