SalarySwishSalarySwish

Rutherford Magic

Créé par: dgfresh78
Équipe: 2019-20 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 14 nov. 2019
Publié: 14 nov. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Transactions
MIN
  1. Galchenyuk, Alex
  2. Miletic, Sam
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
MIN gets the younger player and Galchenyuk signs an extension in MIN
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $76 174 125 $132 500 $3 832 500 $5 325 875 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
874 125 $874 125 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
767 500 $767 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

14 nov. 2019 à 10 h 45
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
I’d do it
Daddy_Crosby a aimé ceci.
14 nov. 2019 à 11 h 12
#2
Insta Kempe_is_saad`
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 585
Mentions "j'aime": 87
Quoting: mhockey91
I’d do it


you guys actually would rather have zucker? tears of joy
From Kessel to Zucker
14 nov. 2019 à 11 h 20
#3
Pengweenies
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,970
Mentions "j'aime": 291
Quoting: Daddy_Crosby
you guys actually would rather have zucker? tears of joy
From Kessel to Zucker


I think we can expect 25 goals from Zucker on a pens top 6. Strong two way play. He’s got great possession numbers on a terrible team. He’d be a really great fit.

Kessel, by all accounts, could not stay. Jims hands were tied
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
14 nov. 2019 à 11 h 26
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: Daddy_Crosby
you guys actually would rather have zucker? tears of joy
From Kessel to Zucker


In fairness, kessel isn’t exactly lighting it up this year. 3 goals in 19 games despite Arizona being 2nd in their division. I knew trading kessel in the offseason was the right move, he was due for a decline. You could see it in his play towards the end of the season. However, we should’ve got a better return. POJ I don’t fancy as a “top” prospect and 1 year of galchenyuk isn’t much of a return. Pens however were placed between a rock and a Hard place. Apparently Malkin wanted kessel gone according to some reports (but I don’t believe that) and kessel stacked his list of possible teams he’d accept a trade to with teams who Pittsburgh would never trade with (ex. Washington), teams who couldn’t afford kessel (ex. Tampa) and Arizona. There really was only one possible trading partner pens had. I said before the kessel Trade, Pens NEEDED to nail the kessel Trade by acquiring a good young player in his early 20’s who hasn’t broken out yet but has shown some flashes of potential. Galchenyuk was a bit too old for that role. Maybe a few seasons ago I would’ve loved him as a return, but he’s already 25. He kind of is what he is. I don’t see any breakouts with him.
GuentzelvaniaUSA a aimé ceci.
14 nov. 2019 à 11 h 32
#5
Pengweenies
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,970
Mentions "j'aime": 291
Quoting: mhockey91
In fairness, kessel isn’t exactly lighting it up this year. 3 goals in 19 games despite Arizona being 2nd in their division. I knew trading kessel in the offseason was the right move, he was due for a decline. You could see it in his play towards the end of the season. However, we should’ve got a better return. POJ I don’t fancy as a “top” prospect and 1 year of galchenyuk isn’t much of a return. Pens however were placed between a rock and a Hard place. Apparently Malkin wanted kessel gone according to some reports (but I don’t believe that) and kessel stacked his list of possible teams he’d accept a trade to with teams who Pittsburgh would never trade with (ex. Washington), teams who couldn’t afford kessel (ex. Tampa) and Arizona. There really was only one possible trading partner pens had. I said before the kessel Trade, Pens NEEDED to nail the kessel Trade by acquiring a good young player in his early 20’s who hasn’t broken out yet but has shown some flashes of potential. Galchenyuk was a bit too old for that role. Maybe a few seasons ago I would’ve loved him as a return, but he’s already 25. He kind of is what he is. I don’t see any breakouts with him.


Something else to keep in mind is that with the Kessel trade, if chucky doesn’t work out, we’ve opened a ton of cap space, which allows us to go out there and get a top guy, or even to just keep big pieces like Matt Murray. Phil’s contract was about to become a major problem because it was going to prevent us from having room to re-sign other players who are arguably more important
pharrow a aimé ceci.
Voir tout