SalarySwishSalarySwish

Opening Night Probably

Créé par: Icarus
Équipe: 2019-20 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 30 sept. 2019
Publié: 30 sept. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
This is based off of the most common combinations from the last few preseason games. I am ignoring Gibson and Guhle's possible injuries as there is nothing conclusive about them yet.

Steel seems out for at least a little bit and Lundestrom has made the Swede line a little Swede'r (sorry, I know).

Holzer and MDZ have kind of varied so far. Even though MDZ makes more sense, Holzer has been in the last 2 preseason games in which the D has not really changed much at all. I think Holzers first bad game will likely see him swap with MDZ if not sooner.

Sprong hit waivers and hasn't played in the last 3 preseason games. I think he may just spend some time with SD at this point and get a chance to sharpen his game.

I am pretty spotty on the winger aside from the swede line. But this seems to be the popular choice. I prefer Ritchie or Jones with Kase for protection, but Comtois/Getz/Kase seems to be more popular. I still don't think Comtois or Lundestrom stick with the Ducks full time, they need to go down to SD and dominate a bit more. Jones and Steel both seem ready to graduate.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $53 007 091 $0 $2 315 000 $28 492 909 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
820 000 $820 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 498 925 $1 498 925 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 541 000 $1 541 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 8
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
697 500 $697 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 200 000 $$1M)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 166 $894 166 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

30 sept. 2019 à 14 h 14
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 325
Mentions "j'aime": 129
I think this is pretty close to what we're going to see Thursday, though all the injured players are skating today so I think we can probably pencil in Steel instead of Lundestrom. I'm not sure we're going to see Kase on Getzlaf's wing (though that's what I would do). I'm starting to wonder if Ritchie is an automatic anymore. How likely is it that we see Jones AND Comtois in the line and Ritchie scratched? After Sprong got waived today, I'm not convinced Eakins is going to shoehorn Ritchie into the lineup for the sake of seniority or anything like that. I mean, I'd rather those two play over him but Ritchie seems to find his way into the lineup somehow.
Icarus a aimé ceci.
1 oct. 2019 à 19 h 36
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Excited to see Lundestrom and that Swedes line in full competition. They've had good chemistry. Would prefer Jones over Comtois based on performance during preseason, but won't be disappointed to get a longer look at Comtois.
Icarus a aimé ceci.
1 oct. 2019 à 20 h 36
#3
Jam
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 170
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: mytduxfan
Excited to see Lundestrom and that Swedes line in full competition. They've had good chemistry. Would prefer Jones over Comtois based on performance during preseason, but won't be disappointed to get a longer look at Comtois.


I like Comtois and Jones for different reasons. But in general I like watching Jones style of play. He's creative, scrappy, and has some hands. Comtois is really poised and has a solid shot. I think in this case, Getz seems to like play with Comtois a lot. I personally would replace Ritchie with Jones.
mytduxfan a aimé ceci.
2 oct. 2019 à 6 h 49
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: Icarus
I like Comtois and Jones for different reasons. But in general I like watching Jones style of play. He's creative, scrappy, and has some hands. Comtois is really poised and has a solid shot. I think in this case, Getz seems to like play with Comtois a lot. I personally would replace Ritchie with Jones.


I agree. If Jones can find more of a scoring touch (enough for 10-15 goals per year), he'll be perfect top 9 forward. I love the pressure he puts on the opposition and his work rate. We need more players like him.

Comtois hasn't been as impressive this off-season, but I still feel he's got the tools and the IQ to be a legit 1st line W. I'd like a longer look at him, but, ultimately, I think he needs to be in the AHL for this season. We shouldn't rush him. He's going to be good one, eventually.

I would like to see how Ritchie performs this season. He progressed significantly last summer and I am hoping for more of the same this year. We'll see. If he doesn't show any signs of progression I think we should look to offload him. We have better, harder working wingers coming through. If Ritchie can't keep up, he needs to be moved.
Icarus a aimé ceci.
Voir tout