timmyv38

Membre depuis

20 mai 2015

Équipe favorite

Capitals de Washington

Deuxième équipe favorite

Kraken de Seattle

Messages dans les forums

217

Messages par jour

0.1

MESSAGES

SUJETS

MENTIONS "J'AIME"

ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG

Forum: Armchair-GM15 juin 2018 à 11 h 9

Sujet: 2018-9 Caps, $82M cap

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ClockReads2113</b></div><div>O my gosh people stop throwing Buraovsky away for nothing! The kid is a young top6 player! You're trading him away for a 3rd!? You're seriously keeping Orpik over him?! You guys are nuts.</div></div>

He's not a top-6 player. He has yet to break 40 points despite being given plenty of chances, and is extremely injury-prone. Caps have plenty of forward prospects who are ready to step up, but no defensive prospects who are NHL-ready.

Forum: Armchair-GM15 juin 2018 à 10 h 48

Sujet: Was 2018-2019

Cole is not the type of dman the Caps need. Keep Kempny, trade Burakovsky, and then there's enough cap space to bring up a couple more players to complete the roster.

Also, Boyd probably gets $800K or so.

Forum: Armchair-GM15 juin 2018 à 10 h 44

Sujet: DC 2018-19

Like the roster, but the Caps would have to give up more in that trade.

Forum: Armchair-GM15 juin 2018 à 10 h 38

Sujet: Conservative

1. Grubi won't get that much in return.
2. Why not re-sign Beagle instead of bringing Fehr in?
3. That 3rd pair is pretty bad. Rather keep Orpik and trade Burakovsky.

Forum: Armchair-GM14 juin 2018 à 19 h 16

Sujet: why not

His regular season numbers are fine. He doesn't produce offense, but his defense is solid. He is the Caps' best PKer. And he's 37, not 40. Siegenthaler and Lewington should be playing - in Hershey. They've done nothing to show that they're ready for the NHL.

Forum: Armchair-GM14 juin 2018 à 13 h 50

Sujet: why not

Grubi is also slightly younger than Raanta and Talbot were at the time they were traded, and with similar stats. He has the 4th best save % of any NHL goalie with 20+ GP over the last 4 seasons. The Caps can get a better haul than what you're proposing.

And you never answered my question - why get rid of Orpik if you're not going to use the cap space?

Forum: Armchair-GM14 juin 2018 à 10 h 38

Sujet: why not

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>capsin9</b></div><div>my question to you is how do you know they aren't better than orpik if you haven't seen the play nhl minutes?</div></div>

We've seen Bowey and Djoos in the NHL, and they weren't as good as Orpik. Siegenthaler and Lewington have not been as good as Djoos and Bowey in the AHL, so simple logic would tell you they aren't as good as Orpik at this point.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>capsin9</b></div><div>caps fans drive me crazy with this grub thing

he is a nil backup goalie that has starter potential

to dump orpiks contract it would cost grub.......maybe bc and a prospect

main point being grub isn't holtby.......... he's 27-28 he's not young his value isn't the same as most examples you'll give me bc he's older and has never been more than a back in the nil</div></div>

Grubi started for the last quarter of the season - he has shown that he has starter ability. And he is 26 (27 in November) - same age as Schneider when he was traded to the Devils. Giving up anything more than a low-round pick or mid-level prospect to get Orpik's contract off the books is an idiotic idea, let alone Grubi.

Forum: Armchair-GM12 juin 2018 à 19 h 32

Sujet: why not

Honest question: why dump Orpik if you're not going to use the cap space? At this point, none of the 4 defensive prospects you have up there are better than Orpik.

Forum: Armchair-GM12 juin 2018 à 19 h 29

Sujet: why not

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>capsin9</b></div><div>i disagree w nyi trade..........thet dump orpik paired w orpik bc is an average to above average bottom 6 player and caps move up to top 15 in a deep draft</div></div>

You are giving up a starting-quality goalie, 3rd line forward, 3rd pair D, and prospect for a 5th and moving up in the draft. Grubi alone would be worth that.

Forum: Armchair-GM12 juin 2018 à 15 h 32

Sujet: why not

Caps need to get a lot more back in that Isles trade. And rather than signing Green, just re-sign Carlson.

Forum: Armchair-GM12 juin 2018 à 15 h 30

Sujet: Cups, Cuts, and Cold Ones

Those two trades are awful. That puts a weak defensive group in front of a goalie who hasn't shown if he can take a full starter's load.

Forum: Armchair-GM12 juin 2018 à 8 h 6

Sujet: 2018-9 Caps, $78M cap

I'm not talking about fitting Carlson just this year, but also in the future. Keep taking on big, longterm contracts and there won't be any space for the mid-range guys that are needed for depth. Plus, he's 28 - do you want to sign a $7M+ deal that will go until he's in his mid-30's?

This is also looking at the low end of the expected cap, and still leaving almost $3M. When we get the cap number in about a week, I'll probably make a new roster.

Forum: Armchair-GM11 juin 2018 à 22 h 37

Sujet: Get the right Karlsson

Definite no. That's way too much for Karlsson. If the Caps want another high paid dman, keep Carlson - he's better.

Forum: Armchair-GM11 juin 2018 à 22 h 27

Sujet: Lindholm and Faulk and Wilson and Grubauer

Have to give the Caps a lot more. Wilson has been a great fit on the top line, and Grubi is starter material who the Caps are already being asked about. That trade is closer to Grubi alone.

Forum: Armchair-GM23 oct. 2017 à 2 h 3

Sujet: would Vegas do this?

No, Vegas won't do that. First, that's not nearly enough value for the dman currently leading them in TOI. Second, McPhee has said he's keeping his young dmen. Third, that still leaves them with just as much of a surplus in dmen.

If I were BMac, I'd look into getting Merrill. He should be cheap to acquire, has a low cap hit, and has been scratched for most of the games. Send down Ness and a forward, and there will be space after Niskanen returns.

Forum: Armchair-GM7 oct. 2017 à 17 h 33

Sujet: 3rd d pairing help (Vegas)

I would offer slightly more, maybe Stephenson instead of McGauley, to get Vegas to retain half of Merrill's salary.

I think Caps might be better just using Bowey on the 3rd pair, but that might require a coaching change.

Forum: Armchair-GM6 oct. 2017 à 18 h 34

Sujet: If you aren't going to trust Djoos, get McNabb

I'd rather keep Wilson and get rid of Trotz.

Forum: Armchair-GM5 oct. 2017 à 2 h 1

Sujet: god dammit maclellan

Only changes I would make are swapping Connolly and Vrana, and keeping DSP up instead of Stephenson. Stephenson has shown that he's not a NHL player. DSP is still young enough to potentially develop into a useful player. Or could keep both in Hershey.

Forum: Armchair-GM1 oct. 2017 à 19 h 56

Sujet: What I'm afraid Trotz will do

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>krakowitz</b></div><div>Probably the worst option for our D. Orpik can't get any significant minutes or we are in trouble</div></div>

Totally agree. I just hope if Trotz does that, he realizes how bad a decision it is.

Forum: Armchair-GM1 oct. 2017 à 16 h 5

Sujet: Trade ovi

Caps are built for winning within the next couple years, before their current window closes. Trading Ovie sets them back.

Forum: Armchair-GM30 sept. 2017 à 19 h 1

Sujet: The Best Roster

Only change I would make is Graovac over DSP. But 4th line does have a few options.

I'm just worried that they'll have Orpik on the 2nd pair and Chorney-Djoos/Bowey as the 3rd pair. Seems like Trotz is leaning that way.

Forum: Armchair-GM28 sept. 2017 à 13 h 26

Sujet: following year

I don't see Buffalo making that trade. Ovie is on the downside of his career, while Nylander is just about to head into his prime. And why would the Caps trade Samsonov?

Forum: Armchair-GM27 sept. 2017 à 20 h 21

Sujet: Proactive

Actually, Burakovsky is quite comparable to Reinhart. Reinhart had 47 points in 1360 minutes - 1 point every 28.9 minutes. Burakovsky had 35 points in 849 minutes - 1 point every 24.25 minutes. And that was while he was mainly on the 3rd line, only getting 93 minutes of PP time (both of those due to the strong Caps' roster, not a problem with Burakovsky) to Reinhart's 231 minutes. Burakovsky is only 1 year older - so how exactly are they not comparable?

Forum: Armchair-GM27 sept. 2017 à 13 h 54

Sujet: Proactive

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>wojme</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>timmyv38</b></div><div>Both trades are awful. Neither one benefits the Caps.</div></div>

I'm sorry, what? How?</div></div>

Kane is good, but he's been a distraction throughout his career. His deal also ends after this season, and I don't think the Caps could afford to extend him. Reinhart is also good, but isn't much better than Burakovsky. He put up more points, but it was in a top-6 slot with better linemates and 4 minutes more of ice time per game. The Caps would also lose one of their two PK centers and a top-4 defensive prospect. Not worth it.

The Arizona deal is even worse. Holtby is the best player in that deal, Wilson is a power forward developing a strong 2-way game, and Johansen is another top-4 defensive prospect. OEL is quite good and Reider shows potential, but Raanta and Schenn are easily replaceable. Having to keep part of Orpik's cap hit and lose a pick as well makes that an awful deal.

Forum: Armchair-GM26 sept. 2017 à 22 h 1

Sujet: Proactive

Both trades are awful. Neither one benefits the Caps.

Premier23 Suivant

Page 2

PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE

COTES DES PARIS

LANGUE

ARCHIVES

CBA

CALCS

OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY

OUTILS

JOUEURS

CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST

CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST

OUTILS INTERACTIFS

timmyv38

Membre depuis

Équipe favorite

Deuxième équipe favorite

Messages dans les forums

Messages par jour