SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

thelastlongbow

Nazaleaf
Membre depuis
13 janv. 2019
Équipe favorite
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Deuxième équipe favorite
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Messages dans les forums
169
Messages par jour
0.1
Forum: NHL Trades21 juill. 2019 à 20 h 46
Forum: NHL Signings16 juill. 2019 à 21 h 52
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>tkecanuck341</b></div><div>Cap space isn't going to be an issue for the Kings over the next several years. Worst case scenario is that he plays quality hockey in a backup role in 2020-21, earns the starting gig in 2021-22, then wants Hellebuyck/Gibson money in 2022. Quick will still be under contract for one more season at that point (assuming he doesn't get taken by Seattle), and then they'll have $12M+ tied up in goaltending right around the time that they're ready to compete again.

$2M is more than he's proven he's worth at this juncture, but it protects the Kings from being in a Toronto situation in 3 seasons when many of the Kings prospects will be RFAs (Kupari, Vilardi, Anderson-Dolan, Durzi, Anderson, Phillips). If even half of those guys turn into quality prospects, the Kings will have a tough time with raises if they have to give Petersen a payday.</div></div>

That's assuming he plays lights out and earns the starter role along with your other valid points. Certainly true, but don't also overlook the cap rising enough to justify the pay raise. The Kings, imo, will have enough for the kids. If they have to, they'll get creative. Right now, Chicago is paying 11M for their goalies for next season and are finding (albeit not so-good) ways of fixing the roster.

Bottom line is, 2M is just ludicrous . Sure, if they made it 1M x 4 years, I'd take it. But I'm sure Cal wanted to bet on himself a little and take his chances. I think guys brave for that.
Forum: NHL Signings16 juill. 2019 à 14 h 30
Forum: NHL Signings14 juill. 2019 à 11 h 52