SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

mfiore19

Don Sweeney
Membre depuis
19 juill. 2021
Équipe favorite
Bruins de Boston
Messages dans les forums
76
Messages par jour
0.1
Forum: Armchair-GM28 févr. 2023 à 13 h 40
Sujet: do they add one more piece
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bruins_Guy613</b></div><div>they took bodies back in the laferty mcnabb trade, who both have term so to make things work figured CHI would take pics, prospects and reilly... they still have to ice a team.</div></div>

They took back Joey Anderson ($750K, pending RFA) and Pavel Gogolev (on his ELC) because Toronto was using 49 of their 50 contracts slots(keeping one open for Knies), and needed to send out a contract for every one they brought in.

What you're sending here is classic quality over quantity. Lauko is a bottom-6 player at best - he's 22 and his 10 goals in 34 AHL GP is the best production he's had in his professional career to date. Steen is 2 years older and hasn't shown much of anything to make me believe he's better than a bottom-6 guy. Zboril's already 26 without a full season's worth of NHL games under his belt yet. Reilly, as you said, is a cap dump with another $3M owed next year.

Domi should get back a 2nd a prospect in this trade market, possibly more with retention. There's really no prospects here, and the best pick is a 3rd rounder three drafts away. Regardless of what you think of Domi's fit on the Bruins, I can't imagine this being a package the Blackhawks would get excited over.
Forum: Armchair-GM15 févr. 2023 à 14 h 29
Sujet: I am Don Sweeney
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DefenseFirst</b></div><div>The most valuable piece going to arizona is grzelcyk by a long shot. It makes more sense to move him for futures in a separate deal, but this is the lazy option I guess</div></div>

Agree with you on both points - if you're moving Grz, it would make more sense to move him for futures (he easily gets back a 2nd &amp; a strong prospect as the absolute basement of his value), then use one of those assets to package in this Chych trade. He's gonna have less value to Arizona, because what are they going to do with him beyond trying to trade him for the next year and a half?

I think the other positive to that plan is that if you've moved Grz for other assets, you can probably shove Mike Reilly's contract into the Chych deal and get that off your books. I think the market has shown us this year that sellers are open to taking back bad contracts if it helps them meet their asking price, and I would assume Arizona would have zero problem with that.
Forum: Armchair-GM15 févr. 2023 à 14 h 32
Sujet: I am Don Sweeney
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dannibalcorpse</b></div><div>Agree with you on both points - if you're moving Grz, it would make more sense to move him for futures (he easily gets back a 2nd &amp; a strong prospect as the absolute basement of his value), then use one of those assets to package in this Chych trade. He's gonna have less value to Arizona, because what are they going to do with him beyond trying to trade him for the next year and a half?

I think the other positive to that plan is that if you've moved Grz for other assets, you can probably shove Mike Reilly's contract into the Chych deal and get that off your books. I think the market has shown us this year that sellers are open to taking back bad contracts if it helps them meet their asking price, and I would assume Arizona would have zero problem with that.</div></div>

I think the plan is to not even approach arizona about chychrun, and has been taht way since the lindholm trade.

I would expect a first+ for grzelcyk. His contract is awesome.

Three way trade:
To Boston: Chychrun, Bjugstad
To Edmonton: Grzelcyk
To Arizona: Lohrei, BOS 23 1st, EDM 23 1st, Puljujarvi, Reilly.