PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
jbigs11
jbigs11
Membre depuis
8 févr. 2018
Équipe favorite
Rangers de New York
Deuxième équipe favorite
Oilers d'Edmonton
Messages dans les forums
105
Messages par jour
0.0
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 févr. 2020 à 11 h 59
Sujet:
gooooalllll part 2
None of these are happening. All just wishful thinking. There's not a chance in the world that Fast and Kreider get traded then sign in the offseason.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 févr. 2020 à 15 h 51
Sujet:
NYR TDL Kreider to STL Geo to SJS Fast to EDM
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>Most feasible Kreider-to-STL trade I've ever seen on here, but I'd imagine some other team will top that offer.</div></div>
Yeah, depends on how the market changes. If there's a bidding war, I could see a better prospect or another piece being added. Perhaps add Reinke to this deal or maybe just make it Perunovich + Blais + pick. I honestly kinda lowballed on the Kreider return cuz that's how I see him a rental being valued.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 févr. 2020 à 15 h 47
Sujet:
NYR TDL Kreider to STL Geo to SJS Fast to EDM
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bsilk18</b></div><div>Fair, to me it seemed that the rangers had more forward prospects (not to mention zboril is a much better prospect than Toropchenko)... as far as Kuhlman vs Blias, i guess Blias is a little better, but its not THAT drastic of a difference. Its like saying "id take Hughes 9 out of 10 times of Kakko"... it was actually much closer at the draft than people thought.</div></div>
100%, Blais vs Kuhlman isn't a huge difference but he's younger, a little more experienced and he plays a style that I personally think David Quinn would really love.
Zboril is definitely better than Toropchenko, but I like how he's a pretty versatile forward. Can play left or right wing and the Rangers are gonna be especially weak on the left side. He's had some great stints in the AHL, but so has Zboril. Unfortunately, the left side is somewhat crowded from a prospect perspective on the Rangers. To be honest, I think either deal is enough to get it done, the difference in the two is fairly minimal but enough so that I still prefer STL.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 févr. 2020 à 15 h 30
Sujet:
NYR TDL Kreider to STL Geo to SJS Fast to EDM
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bsilk18</b></div><div>Bruins offer better for Kredier
2nd, Kuhlman, Zboril</div></div>
I think that's worse. Zboril doesn't fit all that well considering the prospects the Rangers have. I'd take Blais over Kuhlman 9 times outta 10. The 2nd is interchangeable.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 janv. 2020 à 2 h 5
Sujet:
Georgiev To DET
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sagecoll</b></div><div>Top 6 ceiling...</div></div>
I had this written out elsewhere so I didn't just type this but these are some comparable goalie trades, similar to Georgiev. Potential future starter, <30 years old. Age then stats at trade time are shown in parentheses. For reference, here are Georgiev’s comparables (23 / 23 GP, .910 SV%, 3.11 GAA). What makes Georgiev different that he's getting a top-six ceiling player?
6/22/18 Brooks Orpik, Philipp Grubauer (26 / 35 GP, .923 SV%, 2.35 GAA) <> 2018 2nd Round Pick
2/21/18 Darcy Kuemper (27 / 19 GP, .932 SV%, 2.33 GAA) <> Tobias Reider, Scott Wedgewood
2/19/18 Petr Mrazek [$2 mil retained] (25 / 22 GP, .910 SV%, 2.89 GAA) <> 2018 3rd Round Pick*, 2019 3rd Round Pick*
6/23/17 Derek Stepan, Antti Raanta (28 / 30 GP, .922 SV%, 2.26 GAA) <> 2017 1st Round Pick, Tony DeAngelo
4/28/17 Scott Darling (28 / 32 GP, .924 SV%, 2.38 GAA) <> 2017 3rd Round Pick
6/20/16 Frederik Andersen (26 / 43 GP, .919 SV%, 2.30 GAA) <> 2016 1st Round Pick, 2017 2nd Round Pick*
6/30/16 Martin Jones (23 / 15 GP, .906 SV%, 2.24 GAA) <> Sean Kuraly, 2016 1st Round Pick
6/27/15 Cam Talbot (27 / 36 GP, .926 SV%, 2.21 GAA) <> 2015 3rd Round Pick, 2015 2nd Round Pick, 2015 7th Round Pick
6/27/15 Eddie Lack (27 / 41 GP, .921 SV%, 2.45 GAA) <> 2015 3rd Round Pick, 2016 7th Round Pick
5/1/14 Jaroslav Halak (28 / 52 GP, .921 SV%, 2.25 GAA) <> 2014 4th Round Pick
3/4/14 Viktor Fasth (31 / 5 GP, .885 SV%, 2.95 GAA) <> 2015 3rd Round Pick, 2014 5th Round Pick
6/30/13 Cory Schneider (26 / 30 GP, .927 SV%, 2.11 SV% <> 2013 1st Round Pick
6/23/13 Jonathan Bernier (24 / 14 GP, .922 SV%, 1.87 GAA) <> Ben Scrivens, Matt Fratin, 2015 2nd Round Pick
4/3/13 Steve Mason (24 / 13 GP, .899 SV%, 2.95 GAA) <> Michael Leighton, 2015 3rd Round Pick
6/22/12 Sergei Bobrovsky (23 / 29 GP, .899 SV%, 3.02 GAA) <> 2013 4th Round Pick, 2012 2nd Round Pick, 2012 4th Round Pick
2/26/12 Ben Bishop (24 / 7 GP, .899 SV%, 2,77 GAA) <> 2013 2nd Round Pick
7/1/12 Semyon Varlamov (22 / 27 GP, .924 SV%, 2.23 GAA) <> 2012 1st Round Pick, 2012 2nd Round Pick
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 janv. 2020 à 1 h 40
Sujet:
Georgiev To DET
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sagecoll</b></div><div>but that's the thing...Greenway isn't a top 6 player. You need to either get a 1st or a high ceiling player. I think you're holding on too closely to the NHL ready part of it...You don't get a lower ceiling player because he's closer to the NHL.</div></div>
Oh man...I really don't think Georgiev is getting a top-6 player. That's a bit rich, no?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 janv. 2020 à 1 h 18
Sujet:
Georgiev To DET
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sagecoll</b></div><div>I don't think Detroit has the horses to get something done then. Unless they want to trade for something like Veleno straight up.
You can probably get a good haul from a team like Minnesota. 6th worst SV% in the league playing behind a Very Very good Defense. No real great goaltending prospects in the pool. Would be an almost certain playoff team with Georgiev.
I could see something structured around their 1st or a 2nd + Khovanov.</div></div>
I really doubt that DET becomes the eventual winner in the Georgiev sweepstakes but I thought this was an interesting trade for both sides and it works well. Khovanov is great but I'd bet MIN wants to keep him so they have some Russians in the room for Kaprizov. They're having enough trouble convincing him to come over as it is. Plus, that's the same problem as DET. The Rangers are looking for a player that they can insert into the lineup immediately. Khovanov does not fit that bill.
Jordan Greenway is a guy I could see the Rangers targeting in a deal with the Wild. Similar structured deal, high-ish pick with Greenway.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 janv. 2020 à 1 h 4
Sujet:
Georgiev To DET
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>YoucancallmeHockeyman</b></div><div>Wow! So wrong. Nitpicky, my arse. Flip this deal, and you would scream bloody murder that Georgiev was being undersold. You might want and even believe that this is meeting the price of a solid goalie to reset your franchise with, but not nearly at such a low return. While your 2nd round pick will be assuredly high (at this rate, 32nd overall), the player doesn't meet the team's needs in return.
Trying to pass one dollar off as a $50, still means you're $49 short. Let's not kid ourselves: you're asking the Rangers in your proposal to take "some" in a trade, when "more" is the right value.</div></div>
What makes this response especially hilarious is that I am a Rangers fan.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 janv. 2020 à 0 h 48
Sujet:
Georgiev To DET
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sagecoll</b></div><div>Yeah Rangers decline.
Hirose: 0.54 Even Strength pts/60 as a 23 year old Winger with Frans Nielsen and Brendan Perlini as his most common linemates
Lias Andersson: 0.47 Even Strength pts/60 as a 21 year old Center with Brendan Smith and Michael Haley as his most common linemates.
And this is the guy you want to headline the deal?
There are a few possible options from Detroit : Jonatan Berggren and Robert Mastrosimone.
Hirose just doesn't have the ceiling to be considered here. Georgiev's value is around a late 1st.</div></div>
I considered them but the Rangers have made it pretty clear that they're looking for a roster player in the deal. If it were one of those two, getting a 2nd or 3rd round pick becomes much less likely.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 janv. 2020 à 0 h 45
Sujet:
Georgiev To DET
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>YoucancallmeHockeyman</b></div><div>Bruh, alongside the fact that your reasoning is pourous, as a team that is full of passers, adding one more sounds like the exact thing they need..right?
Please, do not sell me on the notion that this is a good idea. His .54 even strength points/60 can be an asset; but, his points are a result of 76% primary assists. So, on a team where Panarin, Buchnevich, Strome, Fast, Howden and all but one of the defensemen (Staal) generate their points on primary assists, you want to add one more passer, and utilize a great asset in Georgiev on such a little deal?
Yeah..no.</div></div>
I'm sorry I don't understand your reasoning one bit. It's insatiably nitpicky. What do you want for Georgiev? An established 30-goal scorer? This is his value, like it or not. Young roster player and decent pick.
Also, using primary assists as a negative is insane reasoning. I don't see how Howden is related, he has one 5v5 primary assist this year. Fast isn't in the top 5 amongst forwards in 5v5 primary assists. Your reasoning is flawed by a country mile. Let's not forget that Fast could be gone in the offseason/trade deadline, and Kreider (who's fourth in 5v5 primary assists) could be gone too. That's a lot of offense on the wing that needs to be filled. I don't see why Hirose can't be that guy.
He's got decent possession stats and his isolated offensive impact is strong for a guy with that experience. I think you're wildly overlooking his value for a rebuild and overvaluing Georgiev as a trade piece. Recent trades for goalies of his age/stats show that this is what the return should look like.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
24 janv. 2020 à 22 h 8
Sujet:
Georgiev To DET
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>YoucancallmeHockeyman</b></div><div>Yeah...no.
Why the hell would they do this deal? Hirose can be had for Dallas' 3rd or the Rangers' 4th round pick. Wasting a bullet like Georgiev on a relatively meager deal is fruitless.</div></div>
Bruh if Hirose could be had for that, you think someone wouldn't have done that trade already? He's a 23-year-old who's barely scratched the surface of his potential. Would be a full roster player once the Rangers trade some assets. They have zero LW depth. Gets them a decent pick too.
This is a home run for both sides. It also is very similar to trades in the past that have been made for goalies of Georgiev's caliber.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
24 janv. 2020 à 22 h 0
Sujet:
Georgiev To DET
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>buffbry</b></div><div>Sj 3rd you got a deal</div></div>
How about we meet in the middle and say DET 3rd??
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 juill. 2019 à 18 h 58
Sujet:
mynyr
No DeAngelo or Buchnevich? They already filed for arbitration for Buch so he's getting signed.
Lemiuex at $2 million is pretty generous. It may be nitpicking but he's closer valued in the $1 million range.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 févr. 2019 à 11 h 57
Sujet:
Rangers fans
Kreider ain't going anywhere this deadline. Maybe next year when he's on the last year of his contract.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 sept. 2018 à 18 h 53
Sujet:
trading everyone
There's unrealistic trades then there's just being downright stupid. All of these deals would never ever happen. Not a single one.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 sept. 2018 à 18 h 50
Sujet:
Islanders all in for Bob
Doubt Wahlstrom gets first line minutes that early in his career. Other than that, looks pretty accurate to me if the Isles do entice Panarin and Bob to join.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 sept. 2018 à 18 h 48
Sujet:
NYR with the Breadman
Trouba trade doesn't make much sense for the rangers. It's not that it's unrealistic but why would they deal so much away when devoted to a full rebuild? Trouba to NYR is wishful thinking.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 avr. 2018 à 13 h 21
Sujet:
Playoff lineup
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Viqsi</b></div><div>This is kind of all over the place.
Jenner-Wennberg-Vanek has been a very effective line; it seems unlikely they'd be broken up at this time.
Likewise with Panarin-Dubois-Atkinson.
Cole and Savard have shown excellent chemistry and are unlikely to be broken up.</div></div>
This guy hits it spot on. The PDA line has been one of the best production wise the past few weeks. No chance will they separate them
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 févr. 2018 à 14 h 43
Sujet:
Major signing jump starting the rebuild to be competitive in 2018-19
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Spanky227</b></div><div>Kovy is a right handed shot that can play RW if needed. Spooner is a natural center that was moved to the wing. Whichever of Necas or Andersson is more ready for the center position I would put there. Andersson and Chytil have chemistry and so do Necas and Chytil.
Carolina is a borderline playoff team.. most likely won't be a top 10 pick and will fall somewhere 12-17. Necas was a number 12 pick. Zucc's fair value is definitely a 1st rounder in that range, necas for hayes and vesey is a fair trade (if not a slight overpayment). That's what i was thinking with JT, unlikely yes but there is still a chance. If/When rangers sign Kovy all that they are really missing is that elite #1 center, zib is more of a 1b center right now.
yes we jettisoned McD and Miller to tampa, but miller=namestnikov essentially. Skjei has been better than McDonagh all year, and if we can get Dahlin, NYR will be in serious contention for JT since they can offer him a 12m contract. they still have the King in net, Gregoriev looked really good in his two starts despite the losses. We have heir apparent sheshtyorkin as well as forward/defensive prospects that are very exciting (andersson, chytil, necas [from trade], day, dahlin [if we win lottery], hajek, howden, as well as 11 picks over the first three rounds in the next two years[at least 4 first rounders if not 5]) . If he signs with the rangers, they are immediate playoff contenders and once tampa runs into it's cap issues in two years (with development) we will be true contenders for the cup.</div></div>
Your analysis really just hinders on the Rangers getting Dahlin. Even if the Rangers get Dahlin, San Jose will pay Tavares boat loads more, and gives a better chance at the cup. Why would Tavares go from being surrounded by young talent and defensive liabilities in NYI, to go to supposedly more young talent and defensive liabilities? You have to at least somewhat understand that Tavares (if he even leaves NYI) WON’T sign with another team that’s rebuilding. Like, just use your common sense. I don’t even know how to phrase it better than that. San Jose will offer him the same deal, if not more, and they’ll IMMEDIATELY be stanely cup favorites. Not favorites in 2 or 3 years when Tampa hits contract issues.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 févr. 2018 à 1 h 8
Sujet:
Post TDD Rangers
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>hockey101</b></div><div>I think he'd be fine as a gap filler. He's a good skater and strong. Not much else out there on D for a rebuilding team.</div></div>
Yes there is. And they’re in our farm system. A rebuilding team isn’t going to sign an aging defensive liability. Not when we already have Staal.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 févr. 2018 à 0 h 43
Sujet:
Post TDD Rangers
Get that Jack Johnson garbage out of here.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 févr. 2018 à 0 h 41
Sujet:
Major signing jump starting the rebuild to be competitive in 2018-19
Meh, few things I have an issue with. Spooner is a winger, not center, so flip Howden and him. Hurricanes won’t trade for Zuc and even then thats an overpayment by the Rangers. The whole reason why Miller was traded was to keep Hayes. Kovy is a left wing. Having Andersson on the right side would be brutal for his development. Definitely a center. And signing JT would be crazy but not in a million years. Even McDonagh rejected a trade to NYI today. Don’t know why JT would travel across the Hudson.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 févr. 2018 à 0 h 32
Sujet:
Next Year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JUICEBOX</b></div><div>Kovalchuk will be a Ranger next year. He currently plays on the same team as Shestyorkin, and the Rangers will outbid everyone to get a familiar face for Shesty to be comfortable out of his element when he arrives for 2019-2020 season. However, I dont see Nash coming back, Brenden Smith will probably be buried for good, and Staal is a possible buyout candidate. I would like to see Zuc play the same line with Kovalchuk</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JUICEBOX</b></div><div>Kovalchuk will be a Ranger next year. He currently plays on the same team as Shestyorkin, and the Rangers will outbid everyone to get a familiar face for Shesty to be comfortable out of his element when he arrives for 2019-2020 season. However, I dont see Nash coming back, Brenden Smith will probably be buried for good, and Staal is a possible buyout candidate. I would like to see Zuc play the same line with Kovalchuk</div></div>
Also, Rykov plays with Shesty and Buch has also played with him. Don’t need to worry about a familiar face in the locker room. Plus that’s not until 2020 at the latest.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 févr. 2018 à 0 h 30
Sujet:
Next Year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JUICEBOX</b></div><div>I think you're right about Skjei, probably more in the 4m a year range depending on years. Nash WILL 100% make 4 mil though and Kovalchuk is going to be around 4-5m. Nash at 4 mil is just about half price of his existing contract. Remember he is a UFA and can take the highest offer, and this is the year u want to be a UFA as the cap is expected to go up as much as 7mil. All those teams that were interested in him at the deadline can now get him with a half off tag and not have to give up anything in return...its happening.</div></div>
Yeah but if he’s coming back to the Rangers, they just won’t pay him that. Nor will the Rangers give Kovy that either unless they’re really trying to compete which I think is the wrong move. Nash would definitely take a hometown discount. He loves NY and wants to stay here. Cashing on the highest contract probably doesn’t matter to him. Similar to Shattenkirk and his situation. He wants to play for NY and if they give him 4 mil a year, then that’s basically guaranteeing a Zuc trade in order to sign Buchnevich to a long contract.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 févr. 2018 à 0 h 3
Sujet:
Next Year
Some of those signings are innacurate. As much as I love Skjei, he’ll most likely get less than that. Kovy is definitely not worth 5 mil anymore either. Nash will 100% not make 4 mil either. More realistically is somewhere around 3. That’s where I value him at least.
Premier
2
3
Suivant
Page 2
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com