SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

cmyles

snizzbone
Membre depuis
28 mai 2015
Équipe favorite
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Deuxième équipe favorite
Islanders de New York
Messages dans les forums
35
Messages par jour
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GM3 mars 2017 à 14 h 32
Sujet: Playoff Lines
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BStone67</b></div><div>Sorry but no. These are horrible lines and you need to really learn what the players on the team can do before you make these changes. Martin brings veteran leadership and fear to the team and makes teams fearful to hit the team you've now filled with small rookies. Polak is one of the only aggressive defenseman we have and Marchenko - although still young - also brings a really strong edge to the game they play and make it difficult for the opponent to enter the zone. If you're trying to win a game just off players who can deke and skate fast, maybe look at how last night's game against the Kings went. Yeah we got off to a strong start, but they learned half way through the game how to slow us down, imagine a 7 game series. They need players who will knock guys down and throw their bodies around to grind down the opponent, not young forwards who have no NHL experience when going into the playoffs.</div></div>

Maybe they keep coughing up leads because once they get ahead Babcock starts leaning on his gritty leadership guys who actually suck at playing hockey (Hunlack, Martin, etc).... you can never have too much skill. Did Chicago and Pittsburg grit their way to stanley cups? No, they just simply played talented hockey players
Forum: Armchair-GM11 déc. 2016 à 14 h 2
Sujet: JVR Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div><i>Well not quite. First you've underpaid Brown,Hyman and Zaitsev. JVR: He does have a least a partial NTC. And the perception that the "don't want to hold onto him", may or may not be true. He might leave as A UFA but that doesn't mean you don't want him on your team trying to make playoffs or in the playoffs. All teams have pending UFAs, but that doesn't mean all UFAs are traded.
I'll agree with in the summer of 2018, JVR will sign elsewhere, cause the Leafs will have cheaper alternatives than him, and there is a cap issue with Matthews, Marner, Nylander and maybe more wanting big deals soon.
Regarding the trade. I think it is to much for the rebuilding Isles (I assume they are rebuilding) to give up for 1.5 years of JVR, especially if Pulock is considered an NHLer.</i></div></div>

gave those guys a little more, but not a big deal. I think the leafs would be dumb to not pull the trigger on a deal like this. There's a loophole in this league where players in their prime are forced to get payed nothing, need to exploit it by trading older guys like JVR for similar talent on ELC's.
Forum: Armchair-GM13 avr. 2016 à 23 h 13
Forum: Armchair-GM13 avr. 2016 à 10 h 29
Forum: Armchair-GM30 juill. 2015 à 21 h 51
Sujet: Finish the Trimming
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>scarchelli</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>cmyles</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>scarchelli</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NickC1988</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>scarchelli</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DontTradeNash</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>scarchelli</b></div><div><i>I dont get why you would recall schilling instead of having 1.6 mil for a better defenseman?</i></div></div>

If he gets a d-man for 1.6 mil then there is no cap space to call up depth...</i></div></div>

1.1 now, drop schilling that's 1.6. Acquire dman with the 1.6. Rundblad then moves to 7th. Not a difficult concept to grasp.</i></div></div>

Pokka or Gustafsson.</i></div></div>

...are both rookies and wont be on the team. A young guy in tvr and daley is a new hawk. Not a chance q plays a rookie for d.</i></div></div>

You realize that good young D have to have a rookie season in order to be a regular in the NHL, right? If you find an established D that'll cost 1.6 mill, he's probably garbage. I'd rather pay a young D half that who has lots of potential. And who cares that TVR is young and Daley is new...</i></div></div>

You realize hawks won 2 cups and almost 3 with "established garbage"? And q cares, you know, the person who actually matters.</i></div></div>

Haha I'm pretty sure Hawks being a dynasty shows they didn't have garbage players...and I'd love to see an NHL team operate by not allowing any new players or anyone under 25 years old on the team. You must go on HF boards a lot.
Forum: Armchair-GM30 juill. 2015 à 11 h 52
Sujet: Finish the Trimming
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>scarchelli</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NickC1988</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>scarchelli</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DontTradeNash</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>scarchelli</b></div><div><i>I dont get why you would recall schilling instead of having 1.6 mil for a better defenseman?</i></div></div>

If he gets a d-man for 1.6 mil then there is no cap space to call up depth...</i></div></div>

1.1 now, drop schilling that's 1.6. Acquire dman with the 1.6. Rundblad then moves to 7th. Not a difficult concept to grasp.</i></div></div>

Pokka or Gustafsson.</i></div></div>

...are both rookies and wont be on the team. A young guy in tvr and daley is a new hawk. Not a chance q plays a rookie for d.</i></div></div>

You realize that good young D have to have a rookie season in order to be a regular in the NHL, right? If you find an established D that'll cost 1.6 mill, he's probably garbage. I'd rather pay a young D half that who has lots of potential. And who cares that TVR is young and Daley is new...