PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
bryceguy
bryceguy
Membre depuis
25 févr. 2020
Équipe favorite
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Deuxième équipe favorite
Avalanche du Colorado
Messages dans les forums
19
Messages par jour
0.0
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 juill. 2021 à 12 h 27
Sujet:
ehhhhhh
LMAO obviously a bad trade. Since this is a leafs roster though, I could do Nylander + 1st for Bertuzzi and the only comments I'll get is that Detroit says no. I'm just trying to making the roster fit in the cap.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 juill. 2021 à 12 h 23
Sujet:
landeskog
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bryceguy</b></div><div>Landeskog likely going for 7MM plus? I can see that. It could fit here if they run 1 fewer spare player. Maybe swap out engvall or mikheyev for a league min contract.
Highly doubt Hamilton gets over 7MM though.</div></div>
Nevermind... Evolving Hockey predictions has Hamilton at 9.2 and Landeskog at 9.4, both 8 years. My dreams are dead once again.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 juill. 2021 à 11 h 56
Sujet:
landeskog
Landeskog likely going for 7MM plus? I can see that. It could fit here if they run 1 fewer spare player. Maybe swap out engvall or mikheyev for a league min contract.
Highly doubt Hamilton gets over 7MM though.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mars 2020 à 15 h 36
Sujet:
Cap increase to 882 million
Why not $111 000 000 for Pietrangelo?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mars 2020 à 15 h 21
Sujet:
Optimism
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CD282</b></div><div>Edmonton has no need for another 3rd pairing defenseman, you won't get anything from them for Holl. And they just acquired Athanasiou at the deadline, why would they go after Johnsson? Forty point wingers can be purchased in free agency without giving up significant assets.</div></div>
The point of the exercise was to fit in Pietro. That trade can be swapped out for whatever draft picks or prospects the Leafs could acquire in exchange for 5.4MM off the books.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mars 2020 à 15 h 15
Sujet:
Optimism
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bryceguy</b></div><div>Well... it's titled optimism for a reason :). But yeah, I can see Pietrangelo going for closer to 9. Not much incentive to come from a good Blues team to Toronto either, but at least we can front load the contract.
Trade doesn't seem too crazy to me. Holl and Johnsson are both good pickups, Johnsson will be back to start the season and EDM could always use more wingers. Really though, it's in there as a cap dump - could be other picks coming back rather than the 1st.</div></div>
Edited to reflect true optimism and slightly more realism... 88.2M cap and Pietro at 9.5
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mars 2020 à 15 h 10
Sujet:
Optimism
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DiehardRedWingsFan58</b></div><div>You're at least $2 million under Pietrangelo's asking price, And no way are you getting a 1st from Edmonton with that return. Especially since Johnsson is out for the next 6 months or so.</div></div>
Well... it's titled optimism for a reason :). But yeah, I can see Pietrangelo going for closer to 9. Not much incentive to come from a good Blues team to Toronto either, but at least we can front load the contract.
Trade doesn't seem too crazy to me. Holl and Johnsson are both good pickups, Johnsson will be back to start the season and EDM could always use more wingers. Really though, it's in there as a cap dump - could be other picks coming back rather than the 1st.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 mars 2020 à 14 h 40
Sujet:
Minor Movement for Manson
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>Sure! Carolina would make a real solid trade partner, but stop offering up Bracco and a 9th rounder for Pesce 50% retained. 99% of the offers for Pesce on here are a joke. Guys a stud. They would make great trade partners if the leafs offer up Nylander. If that doesn’t happen, there isn’t anything to discuss.</div></div>
Right, well I'm not offering peanuts for Pesce. He scored a hat trick against the leafs not long ago... But there's very few defencemen in the league worth trading Nylander for.
Considering Carolina has Justin Williams playing in their top 6, I doubt they'd scoff at a trade centered around Kapanen/Johnsson.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 mars 2020 à 13 h 55
Sujet:
Minor Movement for Manson
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>Oh don’t you dare even bring pesce into this. Leave Carolina alone.
Be honest with yourself. If Dermott had tons of upside, you probably wouldn’t want to trade him. Manson could be had, but the leafs would have to give up something they don’t want to. Think of it this way, if you don’t want him, other teams probably don’t either.</div></div>
I said specifically that the Leafs don't want to trade him. The issue is that the leafs need a guy with similar qualities but more experience. It's possible Dermott turns into the guy they need, but it means waiting a few years, and by then maybe it's too late for your core. If the right RD is available, I'm not opposed to trading Lilj instead - again, it's about timing.
Also, why the hell would't Carolina consider trading a D? It gets brought up a lot because it's an obvious trade partner. They have D. They want more scoring (...and goaltending).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 mars 2020 à 11 h 59
Sujet:
Manson your thoughts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>Anaheim needs right-side defenders, whether right-handed or not. (We'd be fine with Alec Martinez, Jonas Brodin or Marcus Nutivaara, for example.) Now that we've traded Korbinian Holzer, the only right-handed defensemen in the entire organization (including farm) signed for next year are Josh Manson, Eric Gudbranson and the newly-acquired Axel Andersson. (On our Reserve List is Hunter Drew.) Here's our depth chart:
C: Getzlaf, Henrique, Steel, Lundestrom*, Zegras**, Groulx*, Morand* (* = non-roster; ** = unsigned)
LW: Heinen, Jones, Milano, Comtois*, Des Lauriers, Tracey*, McLaughlin**
RW: Rakell (also plays LW), Silfverberg, Terry, Sherwood
LD: Fowler, Lindholm, Larsson, Guhle, Mahura*, LaCombe**
RD: Manson, Gudbranson, Andersson*
G: Gibson, Dostal*
As you can see, there's plenty of depth at forward and left defense, and we have one of the five best goalies in the League. The glaring deficiency is at RD.</div></div>
Fair enough. Thanks for the insight. Manson is obviously an attractive target but unless ANA are burning it to the ground, it doesn't make any sense to frame a trade between two teams with the same needs (RD).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 mars 2020 à 11 h 38
Sujet:
Manson your thoughts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>awatt</b></div><div>I don't see how this helps the Ducks in what they need...</div></div>
What do the Ducks need? Are they going into rebuild mode, or hoping to re-tool next year?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 mars 2020 à 10 h 55
Sujet:
Minor Movement for Manson
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>No. No no no. You’re just starting with a flawed concept here. You’re trying to give up a bunch of stuff you don’t really care about losing for something the leafs need. That’s not going to happen.</div></div>
Not necessarily. Dermott has a ton of upside - the Leafs would rather not trade him. Johnsson likely won't improve much but is a valuable piece. Liljegren especially has a ton of upside. This isn't a spare parts trade. But... if Manson isn't moving, then he's not moving. 2 of those three Leafs players should be enough to get a Manson-equivalent RD back, maybe from Carolina.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 mars 2020 à 10 h 22
Sujet:
Minor Movement for Manson
I was basing off a Kapanen for Manson trade, but was under the impression the ducks wanted a D piece going back. Johnsson + Dermott seems like an overpay for Manson straight up. And Boston's first is likely to be 25th-31st overall. Perhaps Liljegren + Johnsson for Manson and a 2nd is more reasonable? I don't hate that trade from a Leafs perspective.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 févr. 2020 à 10 h 42
Sujet:
JONES
I agree that 2 years of Jones likely isn't worth it, but with Marner's contract gone, it gives lots of space to re-sign both Jones and Rielly. As well, I hate it, but I am starting to think that Marner may be the sacrificial lamb needed to drive team success. He seems to be the one who doesn't bring it when the team gets on a downward spiral. But who really knows outside the team.
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com