SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

brettadv

Membre depuis
31 mai 2015
Équipe favorite
Canucks de Vancouver
Deuxième équipe favorite
Flyers de Philadelphie
Messages dans les forums
28
Messages par jour
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GM14 mai 2016 à 0 h 39
Sujet: Stamkouver, Year 1
Sick roster, I definitely think a healthy line up would make the playoffs and push. I would just tweak the lines a bit. I think at this stage Jake would suppress Stamkos just because he is still in the "create energy" stage of his career and isn't a strong distributor. Also, I think Stamkos would be more comfortable on the wing than Bo would be. Maybe something like:

Sedin - Sedin - Hansen
Bae - Horvat - Stammer
Rodin - Sutter - Jake
Etem - Granlund - Burr

Bo is better on Faceoffs and forces Stammer up the ice to take care of the offense being on the wing (he's a righty). Realistically, if you can call it that, they would switch and take faceoffs according to what side of the rink.

I know Willie has tried keeping bae and bo apart, but they can both feed the puck with decent accuracy and frequency for Stamkos.

Rodin is the dark horse here, he could be anywhere from 2nd to 4th line. Much depends on his camp.

Plus i think we can retain hamhuis for less, guessing in the 3.75 to 4 range if he really wants to stay. Not sure I want to get rid of Mccann just yet.

Cheers man
Forum: Armchair-GM26 avr. 2016 à 21 h 9
Forum: Armchair-GM16 avr. 2016 à 1 h 4
Forum: Armchair-GM22 mars 2016 à 8 h 10
Sujet: Realistic Roster
I think Edler will say no to waiving his NTC, he's a quiet guy who would have a hard time adjusting to a new locker room. I can't see them sending Jake down and risking him getting distracted and not taking hockey 100% seriously. Mccann is more mature that way.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div><i>You gave an excellent reason for wanting to get rid of Elder. But isn't that the same reason why Detroit or probably no other team would want him? Detroit has more cap problems than Vancouver, so the trade doesn't seem likely. Hamhuis seems like a popular signing, but shouldn't the Canucks be moving away from him (someone younger?)</i></div></div>

I think hamhuis will be important to retain because of our 3 newbies hutton, pedan, tryamkin. Biega is a plug, Sbisa is a plug. Plus hammer will be on a discount deal more than likely. (anymore than 3.7 and i'll personally kick benning in the nads)