brainman1000

Membre depuis

11 sept. 2018

Équipe favorite

Golden Knights de Vegas

Deuxième équipe favorite

Red Wings de Detroit

Messages dans les forums

Messages par jour

0.0

MESSAGES

SUJETS

MENTIONS "J'AIME"

ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG

Forum: Armchair-GM15 févr. 2022 à 13 h 58

Sujet: cap crunch

What exactly is the point in trading away Dadonov for nothing and holding on to $6.5M in cap space? If Stone is shut down for the remainder of the regular season there is no reason to do this as the cap doesn't matter anymore once the regular season ends.

Forum: Armchair-GM27 juin 2019 à 8 h 58

Sujet: Post Haula

I think they bring up newly acquired Roy before Glass. Glass will start in Chicago this season and will be ready to come up next year.

Forum: Armchair-GM29 avr. 2019 à 15 h 36

Sujet: It wasnt Eakins Fault

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Chrismurtagh</b></div><div>The ref told Gallant that Eakin cross checked Pavelski in the face when the replay clearly showed he didn't. The refs saw Pavelski knocked out and bleeding on the ice and decided to make the call based off of the aftermath and not the actual act.</div></div>

That's what I fear happened as well. I would love to hear the ref's perspective.

Forum: Armchair-GM29 avr. 2019 à 12 h 14

Sujet: It wasnt Eakins Fault

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Chrismurtagh</b></div><div>Never said it was the only reason they lost. It can be both the call and giving up 4 goals that cost them. It doesn’t have to be mutually exclusive.</div></div>

True, especially when you consider that the 4 goals scored on a 5 minute PP most likely would not have happened had the major not been called.

My main question about the cross checking major is what exactly did they call? Did they call it a cross checking to the head, therefore a 5 minute major? Or did they take the entire sequence of events into account and call the severity of the cross checking based on the eventual outcome of the cross check. Either way, they got it wrong.

Forum: Armchair-GM29 avr. 2019 à 11 h 53

Sujet: Load of trades with TB NSH MIN BUF NJ DET TOR

Which Subban family member created this?

Forum: Armchair-GM22 avr. 2019 à 16 h 6

Sujet: Cappppp

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MG1986</b></div><div>I firmly expect Nicholas Hague to be a full-time member of the Knights this coming season.</div></div>

Very good change of that.

I also don't think they bring up Glass yet. Give him a season in the AHL first.

Forum: Armchair-GM3 avr. 2019 à 15 h 57

Sujet: McDavid trade

So basically you are trading all of Edmonton quality for all of Detroit baggage. Good luck making that happen.

Forum: Armchair-GM21 sept. 2018 à 10 h 42

Sujet: Sharks Cap Situation in 2019

No Pavelski?

Forum: Armchair-GM20 sept. 2018 à 15 h 54

Sujet: EK65 LONG TERM

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>goodfella</b></div><div>As a Sharks fan, this is a serious concern of mine. If Jumbo doesn't resign, that leaves 5m for the Sharks to possible give Karlsson 4.5m of to get him to 11m. I heard part of the OTT contract they offered he didn't like was not enough signing bonus compensation. The Sharks owner is loaded, but I'm not sure how he feels about signing bonuses.

There is still the concern of signing Pavelski, Meier, Labanc, and others.

The reality is, DW often gets players on fairly good deals, but he has a lot of money locked up right now and less flexibility. However, if the cap increases to say 82m and we offload Dillon and/or Braun I think we could potentially be okay.</div></div>

Offloading Dillon and/or Braun may still not allow enough space to fill all of the slots and maintain depth.

Forum: Armchair-GM20 sept. 2018 à 12 h 30

Sujet: EK65 LONG TERM

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MG1986</b></div><div>The fact that Doug Wilson was able to swap Mike Hoffman nearly instantly after acquiring for more of a return then he gave up originally acquiring him tells me that SJ has a devious GM capable of making pretty much anything work. I'm not a Sharks fan, but I find it hard to believe they will be letting Karlsson go without a fight. That may mean moving pieces, but I think this competitive team will stay competitive regardless of any extension given to Karlsson.</div></div>

He would certainly have to get very creative and make a few sacrifices, but the problem that will still be there is lack of depth. They are going to have a lot of roster spots to fill next year.

Forum: Armchair-GM20 sept. 2018 à 11 h 56

Sujet: EK65 LONG TERM

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ThatGuy</b></div><div>As a Sens Fan, I want him to resign for the extra picks!

But I can't see him doing that.. Especially with the aging D-core and their all in mentality (which is good short term, but will be a problem in 3-4 years)!

I think he's happy to be their this season because the San Jose have legitimate shot at the cup... but moves on at the end of the season!</div></div>

SJ is definitely going all in this year. Next year, though, I don't see any way they can afford him unless they either live with having no depth, or move some of the few players they already have under contract in order to clear cap space. Either way their depth will suffer.

Forum: Armchair-GM20 sept. 2018 à 11 h 46

Sujet: EK65 LONG TERM

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Larkinisking</b></div><div>Rumor has it that Karlsson is seeking closer to McDavid money, Pretty sure he's looking at more then $11 million per.</div></div>

And that would make the situation even worse for SJ. With the few players they already have under contract for next season, signing EK to a contract that large would leave them with even less money to fill their roster with.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MG1986</b></div><div>At some point, SJ will need to reshuffle, or retool on the fly, but I don't think this team gives up on Karlsson just after 1 season without a fight for a new deal. PS, the new deal cannot be signed before this season's trade deadline if they want to extend him for 8 years.</div></div>

I'm sure they would love to re-sign him, but I don't think they can keep him around without dumping a few of the contracts they already have in place next year.

Forum: Armchair-GM11 sept. 2018 à 11 h 57

Sujet: This is how you go all in

No way GMGM will give up so much for 3 rentals. Just like Pacioretty, they won't make a trade like this without having first agreed to an extension with EK. Plus, giving up so many prospects and 1st round picks is unlikely. I'm also not sure why you have Smith bumped all the way down to 3rd line.

PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE

COTES DES PARIS

LANGUE

ARCHIVES

CBA

CALCS

OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY

OUTILS

JOUEURS

CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST

CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST

OUTILS INTERACTIFS

brainman1000

Membre depuis

Équipe favorite

Deuxième équipe favorite

Messages dans les forums

Messages par jour