PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
2
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
ahdede
ahdede
Membre depuis
7 juin 2019
Équipe favorite
Canucks de Vancouver
Messages dans les forums
11
Messages par jour
0.0
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juill. 2020 à 20 h 33
Sujet:
Wishful thinking
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Nighthawk</b></div><div>I agree but even a 1st might not be enough for some teams. Problem is not many if any buyers are out there for any big dumps. My guess is JB is holding out & not wanting to eat a 1st. He wants to see if LE can reinvent himself which is unlikely. So other options are let it play out & if prospects can push LE out he will sit in the press box or even get demoted. That situation isn’t cap ideal but savings transferred to an ELC is fine. That would mean the line-up got stronger.</div></div>
Certainly there wouldn't be any cap savings if LE sits in the press box and an ELC is brought up to replace him. If LE is demoted his cap savings are $1.075M. A min ELC replacement of 700k would only net cap savings of 375k.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juill. 2020 à 20 h 22
Sujet:
Wishful thinking
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>He has $5 million salary remaining SPREAD OVER TWO YEARS. Retention is applied year by year.</div></div>
2020-21 Salary remaining = 1M Retained @ 50% = 500k
2021-22 Salary remaining = 4M Retained @ 50% = 2M
Total retained = 500k + 2M = 2.5M
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juill. 2020 à 1 h 50
Sujet:
Wishful thinking
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>brocklesnar</b></div><div>Virtanen is a cost controlled RFA, who can play anywhere in the lineup he is finally playing up to his potential. If he gets consistent powerplay time and top 6 minutes he can easily put 25 goals. If he really wants to keep playing for his hometown team he will take a discount. Also it is not even guaranteed they sign Toffoli. Leivo might not even be the same player after his brutal knee injury.</div></div>
Virtanen rarely played in a matchup role, where Green usually used Pearson and Horvat - so he doesn't play anywhere in the lineup. Yes he scored at a 2nd line rate playing primary with Gaudette, and provides speed and size, but his defensive game would need to round out for him to be able to get consistent top 6 minutes on this team. If Toffoli were to resign, it would be hard for him to crack the top 6 5v5 and PP with Toffoli and Boeser on RW. Leivo may not be the same player he was pre injury, but I'd rather take a 1 year bet on him vs paying Virtanen $3M hoping that he finds his 2 way game. Virtanen might take a discount, but he is also eligible for arbitration, where he has a decent case to ask for $3M.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juill. 2020 à 0 h 37
Sujet:
Wishful thinking
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>Now let's talk about retention. As intimated by <a href="/users/Nighthawk" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@Nighthawk</a> , I don't think that you understand how retention works.
Retention means a team pays the player an amount in actual cash equal to that cap hit.</div></div>
This is not how retention works. The salary retained is also determined from the percentage used to determine the cap hit retained.
From Puckpedia <a href="https://puckpedia.com/salary-cap/retained-salary" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://puckpedia.com/salary-cap/retained-salary</a>
When teams trade a player, they can retain, or keep, some of the players' salary and cap hit. The team keeps a % of both the cap hit and salary for the remainder of the contract.
Therefore, if a Player with a Salary of $2.0M and a Cap Hit/AAV of $3.0M is traded with 20% retention, the trading team would continue to pay 20% of the $2.0M Salary and would continue to have a cap hit of 20% of the $3.0M Cap Hit.
All the numbers used in the Armchair Gm calculator are based on cap hits. For Eriksson, 50% retention of $6M cap hit is $3M. The same 50% applies to the salary remaining, which as of yesterday with Eriksson receiving his $3M signing bonus, has $5M total salary remaining - 50% of it is $2.5M.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div> As Nighthawk says, Vancouver would be paying the $3 million bonus plus $6 million in compensation, i.e., $1 million more than Eriksson is owed.</div></div>
If this were really the case - which it is not, then Eriksson's agent would be demanding a trade out of Vancouver as Eriksson would be eligible to receive more than what he is contractually owed.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>Cash is not a consideration at all for Anaheim, one of the most well-run franchises in the League. Just as an example, due to differences between cap hits and contracts (all downward), our actual payroll next year will be at least $10 million less than our cap total. This why we traded for Backes last year and could well trade for Eriksson this year -- just not on those terms. If we we're to do so, I think that it would be in a structure mimicking the Backes deal -- say, Jacob Larsson for Eriksson, Vancouver's 2021 first and Jett Woo.</div></div>
The fact that actual payroll is lower than cap total is precisely why I believe cash could be a consideration. It shows that the team places high value on efficiency, and prefers player contracts where salary owed in a given year is less than the cap hit. Also with revenues drying up because of COVID, teams will be looking at different ways to save cash.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 juill. 2020 à 3 h 34
Sujet:
Wishful thinking
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>brocklesnar</b></div><div>VAN is not moving Virtanen, they have spent to much time developing him and now he is finally a useful player. Not a chance they move him to a division rival.</div></div>
Virtanen will probably cost closer to $3m. If we resign Toffoli, can we afford another $3m player in the bottom six? I'd rather spend a fraction of it on Leivo and getting a young dman, whether its Jones or someone else. The defence needs to get younger and cheaper.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 juill. 2020 à 2 h 52
Sujet:
Wishful thinking
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Timmah007</b></div><div>Oilers pass</div></div>
Is it because trading Jones is a non starter? Or no interest in Virtanen?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 juill. 2020 à 2 h 45
Sujet:
Wishful thinking
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>Here's the flaw in your thinking: that by acquiring Eriksson, Anaheim "gains a player who can suit up and contribute." (A) No, he can't, and (B) any contribution would come at the expense of another player's time on ice. We'd much rather have Nic Des Lauriers or one of our left-handed youngsters getting on the fourth line.</div></div>
I admit I don't have knowledge on how Anaheim prefers to configure their bottom six, but from looking at the list of players they have now it seems there would be room for a vet like Eriksson that plays on both wings and PK and still have room for Deslauriers and others. My thought on Eriksson contributing was pointing out how Anaheim could use the cash that was going towards Kesler, and instead spend slightly less of it onto Eriksson who is at least a warm body that can be inserted into games.
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com