PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
14
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
VanFan10
VanFan
Membre depuis
31 mars 2019
Équipe favorite
Canucks de Vancouver
Messages dans les forums
137
Messages par jour
0.1
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 avr. 2021 à 18 h 24
Sujet:
What salary cap problem
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PeteyForDaWin</b></div><div>Im not saying you shouldnt give them a chance ( i would like to see more rookies get a chance) but the last thing you want is to put tons of pressure to perform on your rookies. Need to develop them right and ease them in</div></div>
I get that but for guys like this (high draft picks) what is the right way? All i'm saying is if they prove it in camp (like Hogelander, Hughes, Petey and Brock did) they deserve that shot.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 avr. 2021 à 18 h 21
Sujet:
What salary cap problem
Rathbone be nice although I think Olli is the priority this season which means it might take an injury to see him in the lineup. My bet is we don't see him. With quarantine rules plus the compact schedule plus only 15 games remaining they would need to bring him up now to even have a shot.
Lind is an interesting one although he would be grouped into what is now a large number of bottom 6 forwards.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 avr. 2021 à 18 h 5
Sujet:
Vancouver Canucks
Podkolzin?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 avr. 2021 à 18 h 2
Sujet:
No big changes
Trymkin is an interesting case, but in todays climate, I can't see how he gets over 1 mill to come play here.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 avr. 2021 à 17 h 58
Sujet:
Help spend all this additional cap space
I would've loved to take a run at Lowry for our 3C spot. Winnipeg got a good deal for that guy.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 avr. 2021 à 17 h 37
Sujet:
What salary cap problem
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PeteyForDaWin</b></div><div>Looks like a lot of depending on players on ELCs to perform. that defense is awful. No we arent in cap hell, but if this team wants to make any sort of progress they have to be better and different than they are this season. You shouldnt be depending on Podkolzin to play big top 6 minutes right away. awesome if he does, but not sense putting tons of pressure on him right away</div></div>
With the salary cap how it is, Isn't that the way of the NHL right now, you should be given guys on there ELCS a chance to perform. That's how your team gets better. Its what happened with Hughes, Petey, Brock and what looks like Hogelander.
The way the Canucks have drafted and developed in past years have allowed this team to jump up from the bottom of the league. They need to keep relaying on that instead of taking shots on free agents (which we have not done well in).
So next guys up Pod and Ollie (and hell Rathborn as well) help us make that next step.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 avr. 2021 à 17 h 27
Sujet:
What salary cap problem
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BigShoots</b></div><div>I'm not so sure you can put JT with that level of player. I get putting him at 3c to fill a role but Virtanen is god awful in fact I think he might get dealt for a bag of pucks.</div></div>
True. JT would still play powerplay and penalty kill and this way his minutes would be managed a bit better playing on the 3rd. I would be nice to slot in a 20 goal guy next to him but you can't tell me Motte and JT wouldn't be a tough matchup to play against.
Virt is taking lots of heat, as he should be, but i'm not making any long term descions based of this year (Except Demko, I like that deal). My hope would be to have Jake on his final year of the deal get back to that 20 goal guy. No sense selling low on him right now.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 avr. 2021 à 17 h 22
Sujet:
What salary cap problem
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AustonMatthews3443</b></div><div>Holtby is unlikely to get taken by Seattle, much more attractive options, that's another 4 mil, Beagle won't be on LTIR come next year that's another 3 mil, Hughes and Pettersson could very well demand more then that, that could be another 2 mil. That's 7-9 million extra then what you have accounted for here.</div></div>
ITs true, Holtby may not be taken by Seattle. Who else do you go with Florida with Drieger, Maybe FLuery or Lehner fron Vegas ..MTL with Allen?? ... Maybe I still think Holtby is a strong contender to go there as the veteran netminder
If Beagle is off LTIR, again he becomes the 4C no Sutter, maybe a buyout on Rousell and Edler doesn't come back.
There is no way Petterson and Hughes get 9 mil for 3 years. Maybe if we are talking a long term somewhere between 6-8 years but no not for a 3 year term.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 avr. 2021 à 17 h 12
Sujet:
What salary cap problem
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BCAPP</b></div><div>A few things:
1) Why is Seattle taking Holtby? -- Up in the air, they may not and then instead it might be Jake but there are options around all scenarios.
2) Are you sure Beagle is on LTIR? Because if not there goes your cushion. -- If he's not then I don't bring back Sutter for the 4C position and a Roussel buyout is always an option or not bringing back Edler.
3) This team isn't good. -- Disagree, are they immediately cup contenders.....no, but
-Hoglander has had a solid rookie season, but he's scoring at about a 20 goal 35-40 point pace. That isn't really first line material. -- Disagree. Hes doing that in his first year on a second line with little to no powerplay time, his point totals don't worry me.
-On your second line you have Podkolzin who has upside, but this year literally put up a third of a point per game in the KHL. Yes he's been pretty solid when playing against other juniors (not spectacular but solid), but penciling him into NHL 2nd line duties and expect success seems like a huge over kill. -- Disagree. He didn't have a great start in the KHL, but has shown up in the playoffs and is still only 19, I think he fits in nicely on that line.
-On the other wing you have Pearson who has been like a 30 point player this year.-- Agreed, but I'm not taking this year as a "This is who this player is"
-Motte is a fourth liner on the third line. Not awful, but given the rest of the offense, awful -- Agreed Motte is a very good fourth liner but hes quick, can check, and has the ability to score (see 2020 playoffs) I like giving him an opportunity here with Miller.
-Virtanen is having a god awful year, can he rebound, I sure hope so for your team. --Agreed and Me too
-On D Juolevi in your top 4 is not good</div></div>-- Up in the air, we haven't seen what he can do yet. In the small sample size this year he looked good, I think Vancouver has done a good job in developing him through all his injuries. He was drafted to be a top defense and now should be given a good look at the end of the season here
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 avr. 2021 à 12 h 58
Sujet:
What would it take to steal Yamamoto from Edmonton
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheAlien</b></div><div>Eriksson isn't gonna be on LTIR but Beagle is a possibility. I also think they're better off trading the 2022 2nd for Graves. Hamonic is also not gonna make that much</div></div>
True true. Graves is a LD though, we need RD's until Woo is ready to go.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 avr. 2021 à 21 h 27
Sujet:
Jimbicile get Mete for free
Olli's 6'3
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 mars 2021 à 23 h 4
Sujet:
Selling the future for a cup team
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kravtsov_Stan</b></div><div>Pick position means a lot less this year because its a bad draft class and very unscouted</div></div>
It wont be 2022 draft that for sure, but that doesn't mean there are some studs in 2021 draft.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 mars 2021 à 22 h 57
Sujet:
Selling the future for a cup team
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kravtsov_Stan</b></div><div>Ducks can get a better offer than that</div></div>
Just keep in mind you would be likely getting a lottery pick at that first
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 mars 2021 à 22 h 56
Sujet:
Selling the future for a cup team
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Stan_Bowman</b></div><div>Chicago says sure... but any reason why you want foo?</div></div>
You caught me. I really want to route for a Jett and Spencer combo, eaaaaaaasy fan favorites.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 mars 2021 à 22 h 38
Sujet:
giving vancouver a shot
Just curious. Why does Van do the Turris/Jones trade?
Interesting Deipetro swap idea. I don’t think Van is eager to move him out though.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 mars 2021 à 17 h 48
Sujet:
Nylander
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Brian2016</b></div><div>Trading Nylander for Schmidt would be like trading Nylander for a 3rd round pick. Which would be ridiculous since Dubas could've done that back in October. That's what VAN paid for Schmidt. His cap hit will lock down Dubas' ability to re-tool his roster if things don't work out in the playoffs. That being said, I'm definitely not opposed to trading Nylander.</div></div>
Well this isn't accurate.
Trading Nylander for Schmidt (and lets not forget about DiPietro who instantly becomes your top prospect) is not like trading Nylander for a 3rd.
A more accurate statement would be, Trading Nylander for Schimdt would be like trading Nylander for Schmidt, Simmons, and TJ Brodie.
That deal was a cap related deal. Vegas was saying "crap we need to get rid of salary to sign Pete and Van said we got room, we like the player but were only giving you a 3rd to take the salary" To judge Schmidt's value as a 3rd round pick is Ludacris.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 mars 2021 à 2 h 5
Sujet:
Vancouver Canucks
Why would Van make that oilers trade???
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 mars 2021 à 1 h 51
Sujet:
Mapping the future 2
Naaaaaa, he aint signing a long term in this climate, it will mirror Barzals contract.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 mars 2021 à 1 h 49
Sujet:
Mapping the future 3
I think the main thing this is meant to show is that although we have a awful cap structure right now but with picks like Hoglander, Rathborn, Poldoskin, Lind, Woo and Lockwood looking strong .... future looks good.
As long as he can push 30 or 40 goals a season I'm in on him. I don't care if they all come from the powerplay an elite LW is what we need to push us into contention.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 mars 2021 à 23 h 51
Sujet:
Lets re-think our depth
Interesting. However I really how Hogelander fit with miller and Boeser tonight. Might be interesting to see how Tanner pairs with Petey's playmaking. Hamonic and Hughes have played pretty well together I wouldnt split them up.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 févr. 2021 à 22 h 27
Sujet:
Power Play
Agreed a very possible outcome, although trading down for Hughes may not yield you much as some have him going as the number 2.
The erikson deal is there to do if Vans looking to make a splash in the FA market ........
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 févr. 2021 à 12 h 6
Sujet:
hmmm what to do
I'm the first looking to find a place to move Erikison but this trade aint it.
I'm not paying 6 million to Burns for the next 5 years at the age of 35 to 40!!! Let alone giving up a 1st overall and 3 young players to get that. Sorry nope I'd rather keep Erikson and have him dabble in our bottom 6 for this year and next.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 janv. 2021 à 15 h 55
Sujet:
Next year
Where's Olli bro?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
26 oct. 2020 à 11 h 52
Sujet:
This is how much Hughes and Petey will sign for
Some good points on here, probably the greatest one is the Domi contract. It puts a spin on things. Domi a center at a 2 year 6.5% cap hit could defiantly swing things compared to Petey signing at 8% over 3 years? Maybe that does push Petey to the 8.5, 9 region but my moneys still on the 8% region.
Anderson: I can honestly say, and I think the rest of the NHL was saying the same thing, woooooh there Hab nation. The contract looks like an outlier.
Marner: Again Marner put up 92 points the season before he signed. He also signed when the cap was going up each year. He also signed in Toronto on a front loaded contract. I'm not saying Petey isn't as good as Marner but with seasons of 66 and 66 points under his belt in which he hasn't gotten over the 30 goal mark (scorers get more) he needs to step it up another gear in a shortened season to get into big time money.
The hype is real with this kid but I'm just trying to be realistic and put it into perspective compared to other signings. A remember this could be the cap for 3 or 4 years!!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 août 2020 à 18 h 57
Sujet:
LindholmMansonKuemper
Is that what a trade for a Vezna goalie, that makes a little over 4 mill looks like....
Premier
2
3
Suivant
Page 2
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com