PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
UpperDecker
Membre depuis
22 janv. 2021
Messages dans les forums
12
Messages par jour
0.0
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
26 janv. 2021 à 14 h 10
Sujet:
What Could Have Been SCARY TEAM STILL
Yeah and I think his greatest contribution of his career will be that he was the Russian helper that got Bread Man adjusted to the NHL.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
26 janv. 2021 à 10 h 47
Sujet:
What Could Have Been SCARY TEAM STILL
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PreemoForGM</b></div><div>Dominik Kubalik played center in his league. So you could probably have 72-8-88 as a line and be more effective because AA’s 25% faceoff rate definitely wouldn’t be that difficult to do better than.</div></div>
I doubt it. Also consider the gap between when Kubalik arrived and when we would have needed him. He is an offensive player and the wing is his spot. I doubt he could run center as well as he does wing.
The chemistry of the "Cold War Line" as I call it with 72-15-88 was amazing and Anisimov was actually worth his cap hit when playing between those stud wings.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 janv. 2021 à 15 h 55
Sujet:
Moving On Without Toews
I don't believe the Hawks will have enough protections to save Murphy. I can't see them taking de Haan over Murphy. Seattle will be taking Murphy unless we make a side deal that would dictate otherwise.
If you don't think Seattle is drafting Murphy who does this team loose in expansion?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 janv. 2021 à 15 h 53
Sujet:
What Could Have Been SCARY TEAM STILL
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jco5ta5</b></div><div>That defense is still bad. Though I imagine between mitchell, joker, and boker one of them plays LD. You can't play Carlson and sit Mitchell. I never understood why Teuvo went with Bickell. Why didn't they trade a prospect or a pick or simply buy Bickell out? I also never understood the MTL trades with Danault. The team was the #1 team in the Western Conference and everything was clicking. We didn't need Weiss and Fleischmann.</div></div>
On the Bickell trade and why they included Tuevo is because he basically was it as far as a prospect/player at the time. The Hawks had already set a precedent that they would trade cusp players like Tuevo when they dealt away Sharp with Johns, Campbell with Hayes. Its just an awful situation anyway you look at it. Imagine if Bickell never gets sick and still plays at that dominant power forward level that got him paid and you have Tuevo and Panarin joining the team! Monster team that has the ability to go for that 4th Cup of the Decade.
So unfortunate that illness hit Bicks and to a lesser extent the future of the Hawks as it has currently been written.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 janv. 2021 à 15 h 3
Sujet:
What Could Have Been SCARY TEAM STILL
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SlickWilly</b></div><div>I think the Shaw trade is completely unrelated, it was a matter of shedding cap space, and it didn't necessarily have to be with the Habs. The thing about Debrincat is I suspect it was less about drafting for need and more about picking up the best player left on their board. I would assume at that point Panarin still figured into long term plans, and with Teuvo and Schmaltz both figuring to be centers, they would have still had need for a true winger</div></div>
My perspective goes back to the Danualt deal and that you would not have even drafted Schmaltz with that pick in 2014, if you felt Danault was the #3 if not #2 center at the time I feel that pick would have been for D help rather than Schmaltz.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 janv. 2021 à 12 h 53
Sujet:
What Could Have Been SCARY TEAM STILL
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>exo2769</b></div><div>You guys are missing the fact that Danault was TERRIBLE for the Hawks and TERRIBLE for their AHL affiliate the Ice Hogs too. I'm dead serious. Credit goes to Danault 1,000%. He got the ice time he needed (not deserved) and made FULL use of it. He's a really good player today. The trade is terrible for Bowman because FIVE years happened since the trade. Bowman was going for the cup. I'm not upset at going for another cup.
Also, every single GM in the game can have this happen to them. Point out ONLY the mistakes and say... Look what could have been??? Oh Wow! You can't look at only the bad without the good.</div></div>
100% agree at the time looked like the right move. I support Bowman and I think he gets way too much negative attention and not enough credit for being a big part of 3 Cups in less than a decade. I am not s spoiled Hawk fan that demands miracle transactions to take place in a cap era so we can win the Cup every year. The suffering occurring now is like paying the bill for an awesome dinner out with friends. It sucks to spend the cash but it was worth the experience 100% of the time!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 janv. 2021 à 12 h 31
Sujet:
What Could Have Been SCARY TEAM STILL
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SlickWilly</b></div><div>I think Debrincat stays over Kubalik tbh. We drafted him while we still had Panarin so that shouldnt be as big of an effect, and then they never trade for Kubalik instead</div></div>
It's difficult to theorize because if the Hawks never make the orginal bad deal with the Habs sending Danault out the door would the repeat business have been there? I think that even if that deal is made when you go into that draft with Panarin and Tuevo on your roster and part of your long term plans are you drafting another undersized goal scoring wing with no ability to play on the PK? I don't think we have him in our system in any way if we kept Panarin and Tuevo. It would have been more D depth I think.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 janv. 2021 à 12 h 28
Sujet:
What Could Have Been SCARY TEAM STILL
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Pond_Duck</b></div><div>Hats off to you! I understand this had to have taken a very long time to make and it’s very in depth and made well good work!</div></div>
Thanks its such a buzz kill to see in a lot of ways. All things considered the Hawks would be better off with this plan no doubt.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 janv. 2021 à 12 h 15
Sujet:
What Could Have Been SCARY TEAM STILL
Thanks I did not realize that! Stings even worse. Fleishman was such a bad move. We scratched him so much and to think how much lasting impact that move had. The Hawks need D and C help more than anything and those 2 could have been the glue.
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com