SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

TheLamb9

Membre depuis
27 juin 2021
Équipe favorite
Flames de Calgary
Messages dans les forums
175
Messages par jour
0.2
Forum: Armchair-GM28 juin 2021 à 21 h 19
Forum: Armchair-GM28 juin 2021 à 21 h 16
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>yikes</b></div><div>In the post I typed a Kane trade would need a mutual interest. The example being Calgary IS interested in Kane. We cannot predict the future. So the example is Calgary for sake of convenience.

As for the swap; Kane plays left or right and it provides Calgary with potentially the most value for Monahan. It definitely wouldn’t be great for the C depth but if the offers for Sean are low, and with his recent play. It’s a very replaceable C on the UFA market. As there are a good chunk of decent middle 6 C’s. I don’t think it’s terrible if Calgary lines up a UFA C and then gaining Kane would bring a legit threat into the line up</div></div>
You’re assuming there will be interest, I’m telling you that makes no sense due to age/contract/handedness. Out of curiosity, when was the last time Kane played RW and did he look any good there? As far as I was aware he’s played LW pretty exclusively for a while now. Regardless, 6 left shot wingers in your top 9 isn’t exactly a great situation. And Monahan’s a 30 goal top six centre when healthy (which he will be), you don’t find those in free agency. It might not be super far off in value, but Kane just doesn’t fill a need for Calgary, especially at the cost of a centre, an important position we are looking to improve on, not weaken. If we don’t get good offers for Mony that actually address our needs we’re more than fine to keep him, seems like everyone is ignoring his ability to score goals (19-20 was a down year and he was still on pace for 26, and then this year he was hurt), but Calgary still values that if nobody else will.
Forum: Armchair-GM28 juin 2021 à 21 h 5
Forum: Armchair-GM28 juin 2021 à 1 h 54
Forum: Armchair-GM27 juin 2021 à 22 h 39