SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

NHLfan10506

Membre depuis
5 mai 2019
Équipe favorite
Devils du New Jersey
Messages dans les forums
40614
Messages par jour
22.2
Forum: Armchair-GMHier à 18 h 40
Forum: Armchair-GMHier à 18 h 34
Forum: Armchair-GMHier à 17 h 33
Forum: Armchair-GMHier à 17 h 26
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Celtics21</b></div><div>Agree, which is why I don’t believe it makes any sense to discuss a top 10 pick or Swayman without significantly changing the parameters of the deal.

The only difference is most Bruins fans say top 10 is too much and most Jersey fans know Swayman isn’t available.

You are emulating the people who say Ullmark for a top 10 pick is viable. Same level of unrealistic, optimistic thinking</div></div>

I have shared my reasoning numerous times.

1. Swayman went through Arb hearing. More than 80% of players that do are not on team within two years.

2. Swayman started talking extension again when window opened in January. His agent flew into town for pow-wow with B’s brass. But they didn’t get far.

3. Many observers said that they expected him to sign just as window opened (Friedman, Kaplan, etc). But he didn’t. It’s possible team side was too optimistic.

4. Shortly after their meetings, when asked about his all-star selection, he brought up the painful experience from Arb hearings.

5. At all star game, he hugged other goalies.

(Especially #5…lol)

It is a more sound approach to anything from Bruins fans around Top-10 pick for Ullmark or Mercer for Ullmark. I have also said many times that I expect Swayman to return to Boston…but believe him to be fair game until then.

But right now, I’d say it’s 80/20 he extends…maybe 75/25. If he is not signed by the draft, then maybe it becomes more if 60/40….and drops under 50/50 if he files for arbitration.
Forum: Armchair-GMHier à 17 h 7
Forum: Armchair-GMHier à 16 h 51
Forum: Armchair-GMHier à 16 h 39