PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
9
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
FiteMe
FiteMe
Membre depuis
4 sept. 2020
Équipe favorite
Avalanche du Colorado
Deuxième équipe favorite
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Messages dans les forums
20
Messages par jour
0.0
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 sept. 2020 à 9 h 4
Sujet:
Freeing up cap space and building 4 lines and defensive depth
Also, keep in mind everyone, all of these rosters on this website, whether they're from me, from you, or someone else, are fantasy, not reality.
Indeed, we put thought and effort into ideas as to how to improve rosters, and it involves good use of creative thinking, but none of us are truly experts on this subject as we are not actually in the unenviable position of GM but are instead just operating a GM simulator.
I'm not an expert on this subject, I will admit, but in the grand scheme of things, neither are you, as you're not an actual GM, so there's no need to get offended if you disagree with the roster.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 sept. 2020 à 8 h 31
Sujet:
Freeing up cap space and building 4 lines and defensive depth
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TML_Tika</b></div><div>Leafs are not trading Marner as he is a franchise player......name me a player in the NHL that can play 5x5, PP and PK like him and tell me if he is not a franchise player.</div></div>
Is he worth all that cap space at the expense of depth pieces though?
Being top-heavy on superstar talent is detrimental, not beneficial, in the modern NHL, you need 4 lines and deep defensive depth for your team to succeed.
Hence why teams like Vegas, NYI, and St. Louis which have no big-name superstars but can roll 4 lines and have deep defensive depth are doing so well in the modern NHL, while top-heavy offensive juggernauts with average-to-poor defense like Toronto and Edmonton aren't getting over the hump.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 sept. 2020 à 8 h 17
Sujet:
Freeing up cap space and building 4 lines and defensive depth
If anyone must criticize, please be constructive, otherwise you have failed to prove me wrong here.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 sept. 2020 à 7 h 29
Sujet:
Building a superteam
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bf3351</b></div><div>Please delete your account.</div></div>
Suggesting what I should do with my account does nothing to prove this proposal as erroneous.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
5 sept. 2020 à 16 h 19
Sujet:
Kings - YotesLeafs trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rhea</b></div><div>Comparative to what would be traded in your scenario...yes crap. Top 10 centre and 23 year old top 10 winger...and yes they are so forget your anti Leaf crap. Besides you have yet to discuss the nmc. That's kind of a biggie...no?</div></div>
NMC only means you need the player to consent for them to be moved.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
5 sept. 2020 à 15 h 14
Sujet:
Kings - YotesLeafs trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rhea</b></div><div>Haha yes there is the obligatory cool guy shot at the Leafs...surely you can do better than that though because it was pretty pathetic. Cap issues yes, does that mean giving some of you best players away for crap? Probably not.
The trade idea is stupid regardless of how you look at it or has anybody come into say "Hey you know what? This Fiteme guy is a visionary and that is just beyond intelligent"?
Here let me check...ummm no and the reason is that it is dumb beyond belief and that is not even considering the NMC.</div></div>
"crap". Iafallo has had 43 points on a bad team this past season (second highest on the Kings behind Kopitar), and has been trending upward since his debut in 2017-18, plus he's only 26 years of age and just reaching his prime. Kempe had 32 points and played a large role in the Kings' big win streak they had towards the end of the season, adds grit to the team that was lost with Kadri, and he's only 23 years of age. Both of these are underrated skilled players that will produce for the Leafs without being a burden.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
5 sept. 2020 à 14 h 35
Sujet:
Kings - YotesLeafs trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rhea</b></div><div>So the Leafs get rid of Marner and JT (who has a NMC) and get Kempe and Iafallo and the kings get them both (the 2 best players in the trade)...hmmm
Uh no</div></div>
Tell me more about how it's working so well for the Leafs now keeping those players to eat up their salary cap. This trade would relieve the Leafs of their cap issues, they'd still get to keep Matthews and Nylander while getting decent returns in Iafallo and Kempe, and they could use that extra cap money to fix depth issues. Tell me how is that a bad thing?
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
5 sept. 2020 à 14 h 29
Sujet:
Not gonna happen but interesting to consider
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>reelkena</b></div><div>Refuting your claims is beyond my effort level at this time. Nobody changes their mind on the internet regardless. You keep doing you.
You added a retired UFA to this trade so like, you're not coming from a very logical place anyway.</div></div>
Didn't know Green was retired initially, and I fixed that mistake in the roster simulator - <a href="https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/360515?post_id=1718795">https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/360515?post_id=1718795</a>
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
5 sept. 2020 à 14 h 17
Sujet:
Not gonna happen but interesting to consider
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>reelkena</b></div><div>Don't be fooled though, the Oilers would be the losers of this trade. Also this is not interesting. it's insulting.</div></div>
You didn't even refute any of my claims.
Having the best player in the league is troublesome in the modern NHL, that's not an insult, that's a fact. Too much pressure on that player for the entire team to succeed, not enough on the rest of the team, and you have to pay that player extra cap money. Look at a team like Vegas, how successful they're doing without any superstar forwards, that's what the modern NHL is like. The NHL is not the NBA where you can LeBron James your way to a championship.
The Oilers in this trade would be keeping Draisaitl to build around, and would put themselves in cap heaven to add some great depth pieces to become a juggernaut in the Pacific. It was because of Draisaitl anyways, not McDavid, that the Oilers were able to get out of the basement after being the epitome of mediocrity in the past two seasons.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
4 sept. 2020 à 9 h 24
Sujet:
Not gonna happen but interesting to consider
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HabsFan9</b></div><div>You lost me with McDavid my friend</div></div>
Don't be fooled though, the Kings would be by far the losers of this trade.
McDavid would be the only "improvement" the Kings would get out of this trade, and even then, he'd be eating up 12 million of their cap space, plus they'd be overpaying for a mediocre Patrick Russel, Gaetan Haas, and especially Adam Larsson, leaving them with less than a million dollars of cap space left over. Plus, losing Matt Roy and Mikey Anderson would significantly hurt their defense, and losing Alex Iafallo and Blake Lizotte would hurt their scoring depth.
The Oilers, on the other hand, would improve significantly in defense and scoring depth by obtaining those aforementioned players as well as a young goalie in Cal Petersen whom would be a solid back-up for Koskinen, and they'd be freeing up over 12 million in cap space on top of that.
The primary reason a trade like this would never happen is because the Kings would be heavily fleeced by it and therefore wouldn't agree to it.
The Oilers honestly would be just fine, if not better.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 sept. 2020 à 8 h 47
Sujet:
Building Oilers depth
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GrinReaper</b></div><div>We are one yr from having all the cap space we need to address them problems so your point is mute
Neal will be package with a pick to have Seattle take him in the expansion draft freeing up another 5.75 mil in cap
Nurse will also be moved next yr as Broberg takes his spot freeing up another 5 plus mil in cap
This team will look and will be built completely different in 2021/22 and we don’t need to trade MsDavid to do that</div></div>
True, but you'd still have to settle for cheaper talent to keep the cap that low, while freeing up 12million for McDavid on top of what you're getting back for Neal and Nurse would allow you to spend more to build an immediate cup favorite while staying in cap-heaven.
Again though, this is just a fantasy-roster, and I will admit I'm not the best expert at hand regarding this subject.
The main idea behind this roster is to build the Oilers similarly to the Avalanche, by giving them a four-line team with a superstar forward (Draisaitl) in the top-line while also keeping them in cap-heaven for further potential improvement.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 sept. 2020 à 6 h 48
Sujet:
Building Oilers depth
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GrinReaper</b></div><div>The point is there’s not enough coming in return for McDavid let alone adding move oilers to the trade.</div></div>
Trading McDavid would be to free up cap space for potential depth-pieces, as well as get a decent return in Alex Iafallo, who had 43 points last season. Already with this roster, you'd have four complete lines and a complete blueline, and enough cap space to improve the third and fourth line as well as the blueline to build the depth needed to build a cup-contender. Plus, the RNH-Draisaitl-Yamamoto line, which I would argue was the main reason the Oilers got out of the basement this past year, would still be in-tact.
McDavid is the best player in the league, no doubt, but in today's NHL, you need depth, not top-heavy superstar talent, in order to be a cup-contender.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 sept. 2020 à 6 h 7
Sujet:
Building Oilers depth
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GrinReaper</b></div><div>Not sure how you call that building depth you trade Jones and he’s part of our depth
The star piece coming back is a undersized goalie
The kings don’t have enough first to make a deal like this happen
We sold already sold The Great One to the kings weren’t selling DcDavid to</div></div>
Caleb Jones would be traded for Matt Roy in this scenario, which would be an upgrade. Last season, Matt Roy had 18 points with a +16 plus-minus, while Caleb Jones only had 9 points with a -1 plus-minus.
Also, Cal Petersen is a heavier weight than superstar goaltender Marc-Andre Fleury, and he had a .923 save percentage in 19 games with the Kings, and he's only 25 years of age, plus he'd be a backup to Koskinen.
Again, this wouldn't happen in real life, this is just a fantasy roster.
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com