PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Utah Hockey Club
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Utah Hockey Club
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
ColethePensfan
big penguins fan
Membre depuis
20 juin 2023
Équipe favorite
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Deuxième équipe favorite
Jets de Winnipeg
Messages dans les forums
7
Messages par jour
0.0
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mai à 8 h 59
Sujet:
next season
Easy decline for Anaheim
1. A future 1st isn’t going to work if you want to try and get Zegra south of Anaheim
2. Verbeek traded Ricky because he didn’t want to sign him to that contract — essentially negative value to us at this point
3. Where is the top end prospect that it’s going to take for Z??
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mai à 14 h 16
Sujet:
next season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>fil97</b></div><div>this statement has no ground base. we have at least 2 prospects (yager and blomqvist for sure and I wouldn't trade koivunen as well he is special) that we wouldn't even swap 1 for 1 with zegras... what are you talking about
plus any combo of pickering or broz plus some other assets is plenty for a guy like zegras.</div></div>
No, that isn't, those prospects are nothing special compared to guys in Anaheim system already, we have a flush system with tons of players with that potential, not an empty well like Pittsburgh, quantity trades have zero interest to us, and that's all Pitt has, and not much of it either.
To claim there's anything in Pitts system that you wouldn't trade 1 for 1 with Zegras because that piece is special is just fantasy land on your part bud. I am actually embarrassed for you.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mai à 14 h 22
Sujet:
next season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>No, that isn't, those prospects are nothing special compared to guys in Anaheim system already, we have a flush system with tons of players with that potential, not an empty well like Pittsburgh, quantity trades have zero interest to us, and that's all Pitt has, and not much of it either.
To claim there's anything in Pitts system that you wouldn't trade 1 for 1 with Zegras because that piece is special is just fantasy land on your part bud. I am actually embarrassed for you.</div></div>
talking like zegras is some star lol
if you don't know the penguins prospects it's ok don't be mad about it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mai à 14 h 48
Sujet:
next season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>No, that isn't, those prospects are nothing special compared to guys in Anaheim system already, we have a flush system with tons of players with that potential, not an empty well like Pittsburgh, quantity trades have zero interest to us, and that's all Pitt has, and not much of it either.
To claim there's anything in Pitts system that you wouldn't trade 1 for 1 with Zegras because that piece is special is just fantasy land on your part bud. I am actually embarrassed for you.</div></div>
I mean, Yager is a top 30 prospect having a fantastic WHL playoffs with Moose Jaw right now. Anaheim should absolutely be interested in him as a <em>part</em> of a Zegras trade. But you’re right that there isn’t anything else on their pool of interest to a team like Anaheim.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>fil97</b></div><div>talking like zegras is some star lol
if you don't know the penguins prospects it's ok don't be mad about it.</div></div>
lol what? Zegras is a star. One that Pittsburgh would be very lucky to acquire. And it would absolutely cost Yager plus to get him. I know Anaheim games are on past our eastern time zone bedtimes and he missed most of this season to injury, but he is absolutely a star.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mai à 15 h 1
Sujet:
next season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>fil97</b></div><div>this statement has no ground base. we have at least 2 prospects (yager and blomqvist for sure and I wouldn't trade koivunen as well he is special) that we wouldn't even swap 1 for 1 with zegras... what are you talking about
plus any combo of pickering or broz plus some other assets is plenty for a guy like zegras.</div></div>
I wish you all the best with those prospects. That comment put not a single hint of doubt in the statement I made.
In your talent pool it’s Yager, then Blom (who is of no interest to ANA because we already have a great goalie pipeline), and then a cliff drop to the nexT guy. Glad you’re hyped on those guys though
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 mai à 7 h 59
Sujet:
next season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jded</b></div><div>I wish you all the best with those prospects. That comment put not a single hint of doubt in the statement I made.
In your talent pool it’s Yager, then Blom (who is of no interest to ANA because we already have a great goalie pipeline), and then a cliff drop to the nexT guy. Glad you’re hyped on those guys though</div></div>
you'll see next season already... don't worry about it.
and please explain how you're goalie pool is great when your best goalie prospect is the one we traded to you knowing he wasn't close to be as good as Blomqvist ....
no cliff after yager and boom. koivunen is a top 6 sure thing and broz and ponomarev great third line centres (broz has more margin to be top 6 guy).
obviously we don't have a deep pool considering we have won 3 cups in the last 15 years and always contending. but quality over quantity. always. is better to have 1 Blomqvist than 4 Calle clang
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 mai à 9 h 42
Sujet:
next season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>fil97</b></div><div>you'll see next season already... don't worry about it.
and please explain how you're goalie pool is great when your best goalie prospect is the one we traded to you knowing he wasn't close to be as good as Blomqvist ....
no cliff after yager and boom. koivunen is a top 6 sure thing and broz and ponomarev great third line centres (broz has more margin to be top 6 guy).
obviously we don't have a deep pool considering we have won 3 cups in the last 15 years and always contending. but quality over quantity. always. is better to have 1 Blomqvist than 4 Calle clang</div></div>
Dostal. He just played his rookie season and looked great (sadly that’s a .902 behind this ANA team). He’s ready to be a 1A at 23. Our next best prospect is Clara. On top of that we also have Suchanek, then Clang and Buteyets. We really don’t need more, as promising as Blom was. It makes zero sense to open up a top 6 hole for someone to compete for a 1A that you already have filled, especially when 1B has a $6.4M veteran logjam and plenty of promising players who already look the part to compete for that in the next few years
Yager looks great. But he’s playing in the WHL right now. We have a 3rd round D+1 sitting above him in the WHL playoff stats leaderboard right now. It’s just never even close to a sure thing that translates to the NHL. Zegras was a 60+pt scorer at center in his age 20 season. Yager is 19. Let’s see how next year goes, I’m hopeful for him, but not 60+ points hopeful
Koiv definitely surprised this year looking at his stats, but I haven’t seen a single Liiga game, have you? Or are you saying he’s a sure bet because you looked at his stats annd anssumed it? And again, he’s about to turn 21. Zegras was in his 2nd of back-to-back 60+ pt NHL seasons.
That’s my point. No 3rd line ceiling players thank you though
I think you’re taking this as a disrespect, which isn’t how it’s meant. PIT has been competing for years, and now has a bottom 10 NHL pipeline because of it. Thats a trade any GM would gladly make. But it does mean that (especially with the positional strength in the limited pipeline they have), that they just don’t have the assets to acquire Zegras 🤷♂️
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mai à 8 h 58
Sujet:
next season
Pretty “meh” for Laine. We don’t need POJ, and Smith as a rental (assuming CBJ aren’t in his NTC) doesn’t do much, particularly since the motivation for CBJ to move Laine is, in part, because they have too many young Ws who need roster spots.
I’d rather hold onto him and gamble for a comeback to pick up his value.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mai à 9 h 8
Sujet:
next season
Probably more of mid or late round pick for coach...and that is being generous. If Sullivan departs for NJ...its probably a mutual split.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mai à 10 h 31
Sujet:
next season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jded</b></div><div>You will find zero ANA fans who will think that Zegras trade is remotely close. Frankly PIT doesn’t have the prospect pool to acquire Zegras</div></div>
this statement has no ground base. we have at least 2 prospects (yager and blomqvist for sure and I wouldn't trade koivunen as well he is special) that we wouldn't even swap 1 for 1 with zegras... what are you talking about
plus any combo of pickering or broz plus some other assets is plenty for a guy like zegras.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mai à 11 h 7
Sujet:
next season
That's not close for Laine. We don't need to move him, so if we don't get a top-line winger return, we'd just hold onto him and hope he returns to the top-line winger form he's shown when healthy.
If we're doing conditions on picks and retention, it would need to look more like:
Laine (~$2.2M retained) for Smith, 2024 PIT 2nd*, 2026 PIT 2nd*, 2025 PIT 3rd
*becomes the 2025 NJD 1st if Laine plays 50+ games next season
**becomes a top-5 protected 2026 PIT 1st (slides to 2027 unprotected if top-5) if Laine plays 100+ games combined in 2024-25 and 2025-26.
Smith would be purely for cap/contract reasons, we'd likely immediately flip him with retention. for a 2nd or so.
You can't devalue Laine because he can't stay healthy, then give picks with conditions on him being healthy, and expect to get the high-risk/buy-low return. It's either a lowball return with conditions, or a full return and you take the risk. Otherwise we're keeping him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mai à 9 h 10
Sujet:
next season
You will find zero ANA fans who will think that Zegras trade is remotely close. Frankly PIT doesn’t have the prospect pool to acquire Zegras
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mai à 8 h 52
Sujet:
next season
we accept NJ trade.
CBJ and ANA decline
nieto probably going to LTIR or WBS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 nov. 2023 à 7 h 13
Sujet:
freeing cap and bottom 6 retool
If done at the TDL, Detroit will likely accept. Poulin doesn't add anything though, the 3rd is enough on its own.
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com