PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
2
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
Boston14
Boston14
Membre depuis
9 juin 2021
Équipe favorite
Bruins de Boston
Deuxième équipe favorite
Kings de Los Angeles
Messages dans les forums
49
Messages par jour
0.0
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 déc. 2021 à 23 h 20
Sujet:
Leadership
The DeBrusk trade is just bad. I wouldn’t do that one for one never mind Boston adding a 2nd rounder. Brännström can’t crack Ottawas lineup but he’ll make the blue line in Boston? Besides the Zboril injury the Defense isn’t thin. I’m sure Boston would like to upgrade a bit but Brännström doesn’t nothing.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 nov. 2021 à 18 h 51
Sujet:
Debrusk finally coming home
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CD282</b></div><div>He's been called out this season for lack of effort. That's not my "take", that's Boston's own coaches making that call.</div></div>
Fair points I guess but I think there were other factors. The couple games before him being scratched the whole team didn’t look great. The team definitely wants more out of him (probably name a few players that haven’t been up to par) and wanted to shake things up a bit.
They weren’t going to scratch Marchand, probably could have scratched Hall but I think they want him to work with Coyle and discover some chemistry between them. Folingo is just coming back. So the only message that could have been sent was with DeBrusk and Haula.
DeBrusk stock is low, no doubt but I’m not that down on him. I know there doesn’t seem to be all of middle ground on here but I think it’s easy to forget the good things about Jake.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 nov. 2021 à 17 h 18
Sujet:
Is this fair
I think it’s interesting 🤔. But I think (hope) that another team could beat that offer. Soucy would definitely help the blue line and has another year. So that alone makes this trade better than a few I’ve seen on here.
I could see a Boston/ Seattle trade with more players being involved with a similar framework
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 nov. 2021 à 17 h 11
Sujet:
Debrusk finally coming home
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CD282</b></div><div>Why? The guy sucks, he's AA all over again. Had a good year when he scored a bunch, now his production is terrible. And when he's not producing, he's not doing anything good. Can't/won't backcheck, won't put effort in, can't win board battles, etc. Were you impressed with him when he got walked by Cody Ceci?</div></div>
I don’t think you’ve watched him too much. Yes DeBrusk isn’t a defensive mind forward or the strongest/ biggest but he has energy. His finish just hasn’t been there lately. The Covid year got to him and then he was forced down the line up when Boston got Hall.
Try watch his playoff highlights and then tell me he won’t put the effort in. Jake Gardiner still probably has nightmares from going against DeBrusk.
Sorry it’s fair to be down on him but I’m my opinion that’s a bad take.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 nov. 2021 à 22 h 44
Sujet:
DeBrusk trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>villenash</b></div><div>I agree that it's an interesting idea -- I just think NSH will hold on to Glass a little longer; pretty much gave up Ellis for him. I'm hoping Johansen can show him the ropes a bit, but we'll see if he gets another chance this season.
I'm not opposed to DeBrusk in NSH, but at this point in his career I'm not sure I would offer up much more than a 3rd rounder with a C prospect
As far as NSH being buyers, I'd rather they go after someone like Smith who could be a cap casualty with VGK which could lower his cost -- or someone like Tierney.
For the long-term, NSH has Tolvanen, Tomasino, Duchene, Trenin, Jeannot, and Kunin as pretty much locks on the wings next season. If they sign Forsberg and/or then bring up some guys like Afanasyev, L'Heureux, Olivier, Glass, etc to battle for spots, it gets harder to see where DeBrusk would fit on this team.</div></div>
All good points. I really like Nashville pool of prospect and that was why I think Nashville/ Boston could be good trade partners. I guess it just depends on how Nashville views this season. Prospect are great but they can be years away. Nashville has drafted really well as of late and maybe they want a slower build but I think Nashville might want to build off their strong.
Smith a good player and probably would be more expensive to trade for. I think trade within in the conference are hard to pull. Vegas and Nashville might end up battling it out for the last playoff spot. East to west trades seem to be easier/ more comfortable for GMs.
Sorry but I think your under valuing Debrusk if you think a 3rd plus a C prospect is fair. That’s not enough upside for a player that has/ can 20 goals. Guess it depends on the prospect.
A similar trade I think could be used for reference was a couple years back when the Bruins acquired forward Brett Connolly from the Tampa Bay Lightning for Boston's second-round picks in the 2015 and 2016 NHL Drafts. To me that would be the least I would accept for DeBrusk. I see similarities between what happened back then.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 nov. 2021 à 22 h 1
Sujet:
DeBrusk trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>villenash</b></div><div>I'd rather stick with Glass a bit longer honestly -- and that QO for DeBrusk isn't pretty... but not a bad idea.</div></div>
I can see that for sure. I was wondering this summer when they made the phi trade and got him, if phi got him from Vegas because he was someone Nashville wanted.
I was looking at it from Nashville viewpoint as well, it’s weird not seeing Nashville competing for the cup. After all those years and I could see them being a bit more aggressive this season. Nashville has gotten off to a strong start and things are rolling.
DeBrusk would fit in well with either Duchene or Johansen and create a nice top six for them. When Jake plays his style well, I’m sure Nashville fans will love him. He style would fit with smashville style haha
Not sure what’s going to happen with Forsberg but if they believe they might lose him this summer, I could see them “going in” this year if they don’t give up anything huge. DeBrusk might also help ease the potential pain of losing Forsberg.
Glass is still unknown so I think Nashville might explore the possibility of moving him for a player that’s more known at this point.
Overall I thought it was interesting and had pros/ cons for each.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 nov. 2021 à 21 h 14
Sujet:
BruinsSan Jose
I think the trade value is fine but I can see a few problems for Boston going far. Without getting into potential issues with Kane.
- I’m not as high on Hertl as some. I think it remains to be seen if he’s a number one centre on his own. Maybe a 1b that with a strong top six would be fine.
- Hertl is going to be looking for a raise this summer. Probably 7+ million.
- in this trade scenario, Boston would have 13.5 million in cap space with only 16 players under contact. Hertl would probably take over half the cap room. So it would be quite hard to fill other holes. Like another LD
- then Boston wouldn’t have much room for Bergeron’s new contract (if he returns). I rather keep Bergeron personally and look alternative players
- Boston could target Hertl in the summer
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 août 2021 à 23 h 5
Sujet:
Ideal Canada 2022 Roster
Agree the defense is up in the air a bit. But I think people really need to pay a bit more attention to Chychrun. I know he’s hidden away in the desert. But he’s got good size and puts up great numbers on a bad team. And he’s a lefty. I think after Theodore, he’s the best LD available for Canada. Even ahead of Chabot, Rielly, Nurse and Pelech as his competitions. Right now I have him listed ahead. I think he’s a bit steadier and has more to offer the team.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 juill. 2021 à 22 h 8
Sujet:
Off-season
Can you explain your reasoning behind the Det trade? I know Bertuzzi is an interesting player but to given up Debrusk/ Lauzon/ 1st rounder is a slight overpayment in my opinion. Bertuzzi numbers are somewhat comparable to Debrusk. Bertuzzi does have a physical side to his game that probably would fit the role better on the team. But I think Bertuzzi point production would probably be lower or around the 40pts range at the highest since he would be on the third line. Maybe you can get him on a good contract like you have him but I think there needs to be more for Boston to take that risk. Debrusk could also be a great fit in Detroit and if he preforms at high level then the trade could become a bit of a wash. Then you also include Lauzon and a first. Maybe I’m over thinking it but the trade doesn’t make a ton of sense for me. Maybe if Moore was included then I would do it because Boston as gets a bit of cap relief as well.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 juill. 2021 à 23 h 34
Sujet:
Going hard
Can you explain your reasoning? I can’t see the Avs doing that trade or the reasoning behind it. If they trade Kardi it’s mostly because of the cap crunch. So adding a player making more than him doesn’t make sense to me.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 juill. 2021 à 23 h 14
Sujet:
fatkidinc
I like Dunn as a player but a first plus one of Boston’s better prospects is a bit too much (for me at least). I know the rumoured asking price was a first rounder but if I’m Boston it doesn’t make enough sense unless they’re betting against another team. Maybe Zbroil could be included.
Urho is still young and has potential. Plus he’s on a two way contract. It’s nice having him as an option next season if injuries strike the backend again or he steals a spot with a strong training camp.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
24 juin 2021 à 12 h 28
Sujet:
Run it back
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CMcAvoy73</b></div><div>Only issue i see is the term for carlo. 2 years takes him to UFA without buying out any UFA years. Bruins aren’t doing that.</div></div>
Yeah I can see them prefer that and it’s probably better assets management but I would be cautious with not giving Carlo too much term because of his injury history. If you go long term there a chance they’ll regret it. Two year would walk him to UFA but there’s a lot that could happen. Injuries keep preventing him from playing, he plays poorly, Boston wants to upgrade, etc. But if Carlo plays well and stays healthy and likes the organization it shouldn’t be to hard to sign him again. But it’s a risk.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bruins1054_gmb</b></div><div>Agreed. I think they look for a similar deal that Grzelcyk received. 4 years and around $4M, give or take $500K.</div></div>
Carlo when healthy probably deserves that contract but I’m not sure you can give it to him after this season. The injuries aren’t his fault but are a factor that need to be considered. Just depends if they want to bet on him or not.
The $10 M in cap space is with Rask on LTIR and knowing some of the contracts need to be adjusted. I think it’s more likely closer to $6 M when Rask is back in the lineup. Again I’m not say Boston shouldn’t look to upgrade and make trades if the right opportunity presents itself. But going into the season with cap space is typically a good thing and Boston could really use it during the trade deadline if they have needs to address. Look at the Hall trade, Boston was able to make that trade happen in part because of their space and didn’t require a third team like a lot of other trades.
Boston could decide to go all in and trade picks/ younger player. But it’s a huge gamble that may not work. Every season there’s only one team that’s made all the right moves and it the cup winner. I like splash move but Boston has been burnt a few time and needs to manage assets better. And we have seen how injuries can derail any team.
Look at Toronto, they have four players taking up most of their cap space. One year they trade their first rounder to get rid of Marleau contract. This season they traded their first for Foligno and he got hurt as well. Going in every year and moving picks will caught up. And just because on paper it’s an upgrade doesn’t mean success will follow.
Right now Boston at a crossroad as an organization. I actually like their position as I think the window is open a bit longer then others may believe. Beside Coyle they don’t have a ton of bad contracts and I hope he can play like he did when he first got here. McAvoy and Pastnrak future contracts worry me as I hope they stick with the team approach rather than go after a large payday. But I understand if they want their full value. If they can stay healthy and everyone plays to their standard I think they are still a top 5 team in the league.
Either way hopefully Sweeney can work his magic and have strong off season. But I like the roster I have outlined and would like to see how it preformed. But hey if they can add McDavid (or another top player) then go for it 😂
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 juin 2021 à 13 h 27
Sujet:
Gigabrain
That’s a non starter trade for Boston. In a way Boston is giving up three first rounders for Letang. Letang was a top defensemen years ago and still has value on the right team but this trade doesn’t make sense.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
17 juin 2021 à 0 h 42
Sujet:
thoughts
There’s pros and cons for both teams with this trade.
I would say yes for PIT and no for FLA. I know PIT is in a win now mode still with Crosby/ Malkin. Rust has a nice cap hit and good chemistry there. But he is a ufa next season and PIT could benefit from stocking up on assets. I would take the trade and see if I could replace him in free agency but that easier said than done haha.
On FLA side I can see the value of having him the lineup as Rust plays with grit and produce. But I think a first and third plus a sixth maybe a bit too much. They don’t have a lot of cap space and have a few other issues/ things they may need to use those assets to address.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 juin 2021 à 0 h 19
Sujet:
Block-Buster trades and signings
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bobcaygeon97</b></div><div>That's not an endorsement of the player but an indictment of the Edmonton Oilers LW issues. On good teams versatility is a key to success, guys that can play up & down your line up.
DeBrusk is not a top 6 player, you can go down swinging he is, it wont make him one. His average is 33.5 points per year. 33 points....That's a 3rd liner.
It's all academic anyways, DeBrusk has a debilitating contract the will make moving him difficult for Boston and makes teams extremely wary of trading assets to a player who's qualifying offer will be 4.9 Million dollars......
DeBrusk is NOT a 5 million dollar player. Full Stop, trading any asset at this time if your any other team then Boston is lunacy! Unless it's a trade and signing of an extension that will lower DeBrusks AVV is stupid.</div></div>
I don’t think we are going to agree and there are a ton of posts/ discussions on DeBrusk’s value.
The point I’m arguing on his value is that it’s more likely to improve then get worse. DeBrusk may not be a 5 million dollar player currently but any team trading for him has to be thinking he’ll bounce back and produce higher numbers. Like a lot trades in the league it’s not all about what that player has done but will do for their roster.
The argument that Debrusk will never produce more than 30 points or so is crazy to me. Using Edmonton as the example of a team trading for him, I find it very unlikely he would only put up 30 points there. For fun let’s say playing with Connor and/ Leon is it likely he’ll produce 50+ points? And maybe he has good chemistry, plays in multiple roles and a bit of success in the playoffs. So if that happened would he not be worth 5 million?
That’s my issue with just using DeBrusk current production to determine his value on the market. So many trades being discussed have next to no value for Boston and just the potential to make them look terrible. Like the original idea (Debrusk+3rd for Bear) and I have seen worst offers. A good trade needs to have a bit more balance in value.
I hope Boston doesn’t trade him actually but if they do it’s got to be for something of value that offers them a chance to “win” the trade as well. I still view him as having potential and room to grow.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 juin 2021 à 23 h 37
Sujet:
My team
I have to think Vegas and New Jersey both say no to those deals.
The CBJ trade is interesting but I think other teams would make better offers.
Seems like a pretty high cap hit for Ullmark. I could see him becoming another Kosinen and Edmonton having to go through it all over again.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 juin 2021 à 15 h 34
Sujet:
Block-Buster trades and signings
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bobcaygeon97</b></div><div>You just made my point.
A) On any championship team or a team pushing for a Stanley Cup DeBrusk is a 3rd line LW.
B) it's nice you can move him up and down the line up ( positive) but it doesn't mean he's a true top 6 player and that's ok, I think Boston truly knows this, his numbers tell and his analytics tell us this much.
I'm not crapping on DeBrusk, he's good player but his value is extremely limited given his current contract and his future qualifying offer is going to kick the Bruins in the bean bag.
In a normal CAP world this might not be a problem but it's a massive problem in a closed CAP world. a Huge problem.</div></div>
I think you missed the point it’s not always about their play but the depth of a roster. This season Debrusk was a third liner and previous year he was a second liner. Again you can’t tell me that on Edmonton he won’t be their top left winger.
You can look at a bunch of playoff teams with player in higher or lower roles. By your logic a player like Leo Komarov is a better player because he is higher in the lineup lol.
Look at Vegas, is Alex Tuch a top six player or bottom six? We know he typically plays on the third line but I think most people will agree he could play higher in the lineup but doesn’t because of roster depth.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 juin 2021 à 0 h 18
Sujet:
Angry lipstick
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Viqsi</b></div><div>Think of it this way.
We need quality futures for Jones. Future<strong>s</strong>, plural. Therefore it'd be the 9th and some other quality prospect - and it'd have to be pretty damn good quality, because the 9th pick in this Random Grab Bag of a draft doesn't have the kind of value it might have had in another, and so far as I can tell the Canucks don't have anybody at that quality level (they've got better than that in Podkolzin, but that just complicates things even more). A 2023 pick is a little too far off in the future to be helpful there. THEN one has to consider compensation for taking on those cap dumps.</div></div>
That’s fair and understandable. I was just saying that the framework of Jones for the 9th overall pick is interesting for both sides. And both side have their own pros/ cons for this deal. I have seen a few trade on here for Jones that were a lot worst. The 2023 pick probably should be changed and I agree there’s no real interesting prospects realistically available on Vancouver right now.
But I think CBJ would be lucky to get the 9th overall and there quite a few players that would be available at that spot that could help ease the pain of losing Jones.
Another team could offer more in the way of a decent prospect plus picks and they might make more sense using your viewpoint. It just depends on how you value different assets. You don’t usually see a top ten draft pick moving.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 juin 2021 à 23 h 49
Sujet:
Replan the Parade
I think every one of those signing is below market value for them. But maybe they really want to be Leafs.
The team would definitely be an improvement overall.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 juin 2021 à 23 h 36
Sujet:
Block-Buster trades and signings
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bobcaygeon97</b></div><div>Facts....
Kassian is 3rd fastest on the Oilers a team that includes McDavid.
Facts....
DeBrusk qualifying offer is going to be around 4.8 million.....For a player who is a 33.5 point per year player!
Facts - DeBrusk is a 3rd line player.
Facts
There is a solid chance that Bos ether walks away from DeBrusk or literally gets whatever they can from him.
Fact
The coach seen so little in DeBrusk defensive game he benched him......weird that a coach benches this PKer.
Fact
Boston devalued anything left in this tank.</div></div>
You maybe right but I disagree completely. DeBrusk has been in the league for four years. I would say he’s had three good years and one down year that was during a pandemic. You can judge this season as a step back but I don’t think you can write him off.
DeBrusk is a third liner because Marchand and Hall are on the roster. Not sure how many left wingers on other teams in the league could jump over them in the lineup. On Edmonton for example he would probably be their best left wing (with Ryan and Leon being considered centres). So I don’t think calling him a third liner is correct.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
14 juin 2021 à 23 h 6
Sujet:
An idea
Rask heathy is a top ten goalie in the league but if he wants to win in Boston then I hope he take a team friendly deal. I think under 4 million would be what I hope for in a new deal.
I like Vlader size and he has a bit more experience at the pro level. He was called up first this season and played well early on then Swayman came up. Swayman stole the headlines but Vlader has a good chance of being an nhl level goalie. Swayman played well in most games but you could see he was still pretty green. I think Boston would be better to take a bit longer approach with him like they did with Rask years ago.
I would only consider take on Mikko to get more value out of a deal for Debrusk. There are some good options just depends on Boston’s plan.
Smith> great goalie but pass his time/ not likely to leave Edmonton
Rinne > a good veteran that may have one more run in him
Raanta > not the most consistent goalie
Dubnyk > very hot and cold. Not high on my list
Halak > I think he’ll explore other options where he’ll be the backup at least with no questions marks. But maybe he and his family love the city so they stay
Rittich > probably wouldn’t be the best mentor for Swayman/ Vlader.
Mrazek > will have multiple options and will probably want term. One of the more proven goalie on the market
Ullmark > probably wouldn’t be able to handle a large workload so Swayman/ Vlader would definitely get their time in the crease. I know Boston added Hall and it worked out fine but I think adding Sabres in general is not a recipe for success lol
Andersen > is the top ufa goalie available. I would like him on a prove it deal and him in the starting role if Rask doesn’t return. It would be hilarious if Boston met Toronto in the playoff next year and he steals the series haha
I don’t think Boston needs to go crazy this off season and should be smart about potential moves. I hope Krecji returns and value wise around 4 million. But there will be a demand for him on the open market. Hall as well but I would not give him more than Marchand. I agree about Kase. I feel for him and hope he can get his career back. Such bad luck
The backend is a big question mark still. I didn’t love Reilly as much, I was hoping for more of an impact. He skates and passes well but he never really looked overly dangerous. I would prefer Boston looks for an upgrade or taking a chance on another player.
I’m a bit concerned about Carlo and his injury history. As long as his contract not crazy I’ll take him any day but if he’s asking for too much Boston maybe better suited trading him.
Ahcan is a bit undersized. But if he can chip in a few goals at the nhl level I would give him a shot. The minor league dmen I’m most interested in is Lyle. But it would be nice if they’re both pushing for spots in the lineup. I think both start in the ahl next year and get a chance mostly due to injury.
I hope Seattle doesn’t pick Lauzon. Personally I see him as a good fit in Cassidy’s system and he has potential to really develop. Same with Clifton.
Overall I think there likely only one roster spot on the backend (if Boston doesn’t do a major shake up) and I think Boston should be looking at adding a power play quarterback.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 juin 2021 à 19 h 37
Sujet:
Angry lipstick
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Viqsi</b></div><div>There's absolutely none worth speaking of. With a Jones trade, we either need to boost the roster back up, or go for futures. This handicaps the roster futher and cheaps out on futures.</div></div>
You took one part of my response. It’s NOT a prefect trade for CBJ but how is the 9th overall in this year draft not valuable? The pick would definitely help setup their future.
Again Vancouver would need to add more but not anything too crazy. I can see reasons for and against it. If you expect to trade Jones and have a major win it’s probably unlikely to happen.
Maybe you have a better trade in mind but I think you get more quality over quantity in this proposal. Would a deal that gives them later first rounder, maybe another draft pick and a prospect be better? Just because of the bad contracts included that are only one year?
Forum:
Mock-Draft
14 juin 2021 à 18 h 53
Sujet:
Top 5 of every position (except goalies)
Why is Clarke rated so low? You have five players ahead of him. This is the lowest I’ve seen anyone ranking him among dmen. He was really good at the under 18 tournament. Personally I would only have Power above him. I know some people prefer hughes but there no way Svozil or Lambos are drafted before him. Unless there’s something you know that says otherwise.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 juin 2021 à 18 h 42
Sujet:
If u get hamilton year 2
Toronto would have no depth at all in this scenario. If you look at this year’s playoff you’ve seen how important depth is to a team having success.
The bottom six and third pairing on this team is really bad. Hopefully Matthews and Marner don’t disappear in the playoff again.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 juin 2021 à 18 h 31
Sujet:
Block-Buster trades and signings
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OilerMcdavid</b></div><div>Why we trading a RHD who can play top pair for a 3rd line winger that’s probably just another Kassian?</div></div>
I don’t think you’ve seen much of Debrusk. He’s a top six player on most teams. This year was tough for him and then Boston got Hall so he was forced into the bottom six.
Comparing him to Kassian is honestly crazy. Debrusk can skate backwards faster than Kassian can skate forward lol. DeBrusk
can play on the powerplay and penalty kill no problems. Kassian career high in points was 36 (with McDavid) and he’ll never get close again. JD had two 40+ season already and has a ton left in the tank.
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com