PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
Bosse
Membre depuis
14 mars 2024
Messages dans les forums
17
Messages par jour
0.3
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Mock-Draft
19 avr. à 19 h 11
Sujet:
1st round
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kraken</b></div><div>A few suggestions:
</div></div>
Thanks for the feedback. Of course this is highly subjective and everyone will have very different evaluations. But I'll explain my logic on those picks:
Habs: Eiserman, because I think their greatest need is a left shot scorer. And he has such a sturdy build and I like the development path of NTDP into college for him. So I think it's a very safe pick compared to someone like Catton whose dynamic playstyle will be much harder to translate to the NHL, especially at his size and with the limited options he has in terms of league to play in in the next 2 years. It's like Cutter Gauthier compared to Matt Savoie.
Flames: O'boy they sure are depressing to look at. The typical route for teams like them that need everything is to build defense>center>wing. But defense is their least bad position, both in their roster and prospect pool. And if they pick Silayev then they wont be able sell a ticket in the upcoming years. So Catton is someone with high upside, by far the most likely of the remaining players to become a 1C, and super exciting to watch. So even if they'll suck, as what's left of their core approaches an average age of 35, at least they'll have an exciting young player to watch. As to Iginla and Helenius, I just don't think they have anywhere close to the potential of Catton, and Calgary isn't in a position to make lower risk / lower reward picks like that.
Devils: I guess the disagreement here is just whether or not Eiserman will be available at 10. I just think the public scouts are having an overreaction because his development haven't been as good as hoped. Last year he was considered 1st/2nd in this draft class by most public scouts. Maybe the pressure got to him, and he's just been squeezing his stick too hard. He's one of the youngest in the draft class and is going to a great college program, so I think the concerns of him not having rounded out his game this year are greatly overblown.
Sabres: 2 months ago I would've been all ears for Yakemchuk. But since adding Byram I just think they are too stocked up on offensively gifted, young defensemen to pick another one. It's always good to have talent in the pipeline though. But for that purpose I'd prefer Jiricek over Yakemchuk. I think he has more talent and has a lot more physical development left in him. So if one were to simmer in WHL/Europe/AHL for 4 or so years then I think Jiricek is the better player at the end of it. As to why Greentree, I think he has a toolkit that is sorely needed on the Sabres: the ability and willingness to absorb contact and maintaining the ability to make plays during contact, a Draisatl type. They don't have anyone like that, which makes it so hard for them to get through structured defenses.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 avr. à 13 h 56
Sujet:
If the Flames decides to rebuild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoxNix</b></div><div>No way Calgary does that. Byram is too injury prone and Savoie is too small.</div></div>
Aww shucks!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 avr. à 13 h 55
Sujet:
If the Flames decides to rebuild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>GM - gone. Director of Amateur Scouting - gone. Head European Scout - gone. I'm sure others had input but those were the guys calling the shots when it came to selecting a European prospect.
Hawks want to build their blue line to mimic Vegas, LA, Nashville. Big body, mobile guys who like to play a physical style and who block a ton of shots. That doesn't exactly sound like Joki to me.</div></div>
The head European scout and head scout, Niklas Blomgren, is not gone. Neither is their director of European scouting nor head western scout. So all the guys that would've done most of his scouting are still there. As are a ton of people on the development and management side. There is definitely a ton of people left in the Blackhawks organization that like this player a lot in the past.
What makes you think they want to build their blueline with the type of player you're describing?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 avr. à 13 h 35
Sujet:
If the Flames decides to rebuild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JK74</b></div><div>So you completely glossed over where 81 said there were 3 people involved in the DECISION to draft Joker. Not the 2017 draft all together. Reading comprehension is a dying craft I see.</div></div>
Lol what? I just teased him a bit because he phrased himself poorly. Obviously there was far more people than that involved in the decision to draft Jokiharju. You seriously can't believe anything else. Like he played in both Finland and the WHL. European scout, NA scout and head scout is the minimum amount of scouts being involved in the decision, and then there's obviously a ton of management people involved.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 avr. à 9 h 16
Sujet:
If the Flames decides to rebuild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>exo2769</b></div><div>Yeah Bowman, but really Mark Kelley is/are gone. I agree with JK74 though. I was PISSED when they traded him for Alex Nylander. I liked his game and he was getting good minutes as a rookie. Of course he made rookie mistakes like all rookies do. Coach Q didn't put up with that which was a weakness of his toward player development. BUT, to your question, The Hawks need a physical veteran on the right. I'd prefer over paying for demelo or Roy or etc... we have 3 rookies on the left side right now (Tinordi plays, but I consider him the #7 as other rookies rotate in). No reason to lose a 2nd.</div></div>
Aight.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 avr. à 8 h 30
Sujet:
If the Flames decides to rebuild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>All 3 people involved in the decision to draft Joki are gone. Hawks won't pay a 2nd for Joki. He isn't the type of player the Hawks want on their blue line going forward.</div></div>
Chicago had 3 people involved in the 2017 draft? And I thought Buffalo was a poverty franchise... :)
Why is he not the type of player they want on their blue line going forward?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 avr. à 8 h 28
Sujet:
If the Flames decides to rebuild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>I don't think you understand Calgary's rebuild at all. This is not a 5-7 year bottom feed plan, this is a 2-3 year max (this one included) "competitive" rebuild.</div></div>
Lol this whole post is based on the premise of them rebuilding as opposed to just retooling... If they aren't rebuilding and want to keep all their ageing players that still have trade value then this is all a non-starter.
Not going to bother with the rest of your comment. If you think there's a meaningful distinction for an owner to pay someone not to work for them and this player then being signed by a competing team, and them doing the exactly same thing but it's called retention instead of buy-out then I'm not going to try to stop you. :)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 avr. à 7 h 47
Sujet:
If the Flames decides to rebuild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JK74</b></div><div>I liked Joker when he was here and was beyond upset when he was traded for Alex freaking Nylander but I think his value has slowly dropped over the last couple of years. You might get a 2nd for him from another team but I'm 99.9% sure Chicago wouldn't be interested.</div></div>
He's been very good this year. Defends well and does smart decisions with the puck. I think he would make sense for Chicago as they'll have to start getting better, they could use a 25 year old RD, they already have plenty of size so his 6' flat shouldn't be an issue, and there are surely plenty of people in the organization that likes his game since they drafted him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 avr. à 7 h 40
Sujet:
If the Flames decides to rebuild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>Flames are rebuilding but you are on drugs if you think any owner would ever agree to pay someone 15 million to play for another team. Even with San Jose's Hertl trade they are paying him ~8M total spread across 6 years.
Also Flames would decline that anyways, Maybe Byram + Savoie for Weegar but certainly not Kadri retained too</div></div>
Teams pays amounts like that all the time. Like Nashville are currently paying Johansen, Duchene and Turris $33M not to play for them. Philly and Minnesota are paying about $15M each for Hayes, DeAngelo, Suter and Parise not to play for them. That's what happens with bad contracts.
But sure, even if they decide to rebuild the owners might rather just give Kadri away, or even keep him for a year or two then pay a 1st to get rid of his contract, rather than retaining on him and get an up and coming star from Alberta in Savoie. I think that's stupid though so that's why I don't suggest that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 mars à 22 h 35
Sujet:
ntto
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bwhsocal</b></div><div>AZ easy pass</div></div>
Good. He's the one I was the most unsure about. So good that you value him that highly.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 mars à 10 h 15
Sujet:
Sabres
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>littlejerryseinfeld</b></div><div>Apologize for my initial post.
Buffalo is extremely high on Power (signed 7 year contract) and Peterka (our leading goal scorer at 22 years old on an ELC) and would not at all be interested in this trade.
It frankly was a shocking trade to see</div></div>
Of course. The only realistic move is Adams signing 1-2 4th liners, so that wouldn't be very interesting to draw up. This is what I want to happen, not what I think will happen.
Because Power lacks the necessary aggression I think this team needs from such a pivotal role. And his potential is wasted (and too costly) on the 2nd pair, playing behind both Dahlin and Byram. I don't think Dahlin and Byram on the top powerplay is a good long term plan, so this solves that. And I think a playmaker is desperately needed on the powerplay and in the top6 in general as Thompson and Cozens are shooters, and it would be much more beneficial to have a playmaker activating them than it is to have yet another shooter in Peterka.
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com