PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
BergerOn
Membre depuis
1 juin 2015
Équipe favorite
Bruins de Boston
Deuxième équipe favorite
Flames de Calgary
Messages dans les forums
158
Messages par jour
0.0
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 juill. 2018 à 15 h 32
Sujet:
Panarin
Already was assuming the 2nd was conditional but forgot to add that but yeah I think CBJ takes that and Panarin resigns 8/8mil
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 août 2017 à 11 h 25
Sujet:
Spooner? What do you think Boston fans?
Spooner for either Wilson or Rust and a mid round pick, bruins want a player
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 janv. 2016 à 15 h 5
Sujet:
If Boston's rebuilding...
Noooo wayyy haha bruins arent rebuilding maybe retooling, they arent tradng any part of their core even if they dont make the playoffs. Bergeron, Krejci, Rask, and krug arent getting traded. Bruins will maybe make a hockey trade or a buyer trade for a non expiring contract for a dman but no way they blow it up... and even more if they do trade someone like that theres no way in hell its to chicago...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 nov. 2015 à 13 h 53
Sujet:
Alexander Khokhlachev
wha? wuh? huh? Murphy isnt that sold out... kok is barely worth a single 2nd round pick as it is... wuh?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 sept. 2015 à 12 h 49
Sujet:
Canucks side of nsurge9's VAN-BOS trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div><i>Is Elder that good? Think the Bruins should hold onto Morrow and their pick and if they need a Dman next year, get a free agent.</i></div></div>
Edler is worth two top prospects and a 1st rounder especially because he is signed long term, he ma not be the guy as a No. 1 but hes a Top 2 Dman and for the bruins a top 6 of Chara-Edler, Krug-Seidenberg, Irwin-McQuaid is a legitimate force in the Atlantic, plus Morrow is likely not going to get a great opportunity on the bruins because of their depth down the left side this season, and they could hold on to him but he is too close to spend more AHL time and the bruins probably see Colin Miller, Zach Trotman, and Matt Irwin as all better options. On the Canucks side of it, I see Koko maybe playing on the 4th line with the canucks and I say this because I expect either Burrows or Chris Higgins to be traded anyway becaxuse of the Canucks forward depth, and Morrow may get a top 6 spot as he is a former 1st rnder, hes definitely a better option than Bartkowski and Weber. Anyways, on both sides it is an improvement: cancucks improve depth, fre up cape space, and have the freedom to move on from burrows/higgins, and the bruins get a real top 4 D core
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 juin 2015 à 2 h 1
Sujet:
bruins nash
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BruinsDieHard213</b></div><div><i>That team goes nowhere, sorry.
<strong>To start off:</strong>
Neither the Bruins nor the Rangers would touch that deal. It doesn't make any sense for either team. Rangers give up a 40-50 goal scorer for a downgrade in Lucic (scoring wise). I'd rather have Lucic over Nash come playoff time (assuming the B's make the playoffs).
Go compare Krug and Yandle. Very similar players, with Krug still having tons of time to mature and grow as a player. Yandle is extremely expensive (and the Rags aren't retaining his salary; especially that much). Going forward, i'd take Krug over Yandle anyway. Krug is a gamer and comes up big when you need him to; albeit in a small career sample size.
Reilly Smith, though i don't care for him, has value and should be used elsewhere, since like i said, the deal wouldn't happen.
<strong>On the Vancouver Deal:</strong>
It's even worse than the Rangers deal. Downgrading a great deal in both positions. Eriksson >> Kassian and Seidenberg is still better than Bieksa, even if Seids is coming off injury.
<strong>Everything else:</strong>
Chris Kelly cannot be on this team come the start of the season. His cap hit is too large for a team needing cap space. He doesn't put up points, and at this point in his career in a grossly overpaid 4th liner. That proposed 3rd line would be brutal offensively. Your hoping Connolly can put it together here in Boston. You will get ZERO offensive help from Kelly; Spooner would rot with those two.
Too many "??" for the RW depth. Pastrnak, though on track to be a really good player, is still young and more than likely won't be able to handle a full 82 game season as the team's #1 RW option. Kassian is nothing more than a 3rd/4th liner at this point, and though he shows flashes, doesn't have the IQ to be a consistently good player. I would take him on the team, but not in the role you proposed and not in the deal you proposed.</i></div></div>
Jensen potential top 6 and former first rnder, kassian a risk with high upside and Bieksa is a better D man than seids and is a righty which fits the bs better for the 4th d man so for the vancouver deal I think the bruins get a lot for a d man on the dcline with 3 yrs left at 4 mil and an expiring misfit in eriksson. As far as nash... your trading for an underachiever but you clear out two underachievers in smith and lucic and only give up krug and a pick added on to get Nash (40 goal scorer) and Yandle whose better defensively than Krug and has same PP strengths. Morrow has better upside as top 4 than krug anyways so you put him as 6D with miller to develop but you cant trust Krug for top 4 D minutes (and after this season when hes an RFA again i bet they would trade him anyway cuz he doesnt fit as a long term player with the bruins as a top 4 D), but Yandle you can trust as a top 4 D with those minutes. Also, you get younger, faster, and more skilled only giving up Seids, Lucic, krug and Smith. Nash has only 3 more years, Yandle and/or bieksa can be let go after the season and that cap space can be used elsewhere instead of it being tied up in Krug, Smith, and Seids who werent going to get it done at the price.
O and on Kelly, I see your point but the reality is that Kelly brings trust to the table that they will want at the very least from him at the 4th line LW position (if talbot is on the bench then), and 1 more year at 3 mil to help along a team of young guys who have the two way skill but need someone to push them to put it all together. Koko/spooner can benefit from kelly in doses, not saying he starts every game but they need a fall back plan if Koko/spooner/talbot/connolly cant get it done on the bottom six defensively. Kelly here is a safety net and a veteran presence
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com