ARCHIVES ▾
CBA ▾
CALCS ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS ▾
JOUEURS ▾
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
RECHERCHER
| RONDE 1 | ÉQUIPE | ORIGINAL | JOUEUR | DéTAILS |
|---|
| 1 |  | - | You take him if you can get him. Center is a position Detroit could use another top guy. | |
| 2 |  | - | Best Defenseman (imo) and future 1st pairing with Dahlin and Clarke looks great. | |
| 3 |  | - | Best Forward available imo (over Guenther because his sample size isn’t that big) and has the potential to be a 1st line winger next to Zegras. | |
| 4 |  | - | No. 1 defenseman potential and BPA. | |
| 5 |  | - | If he’s there they will take him I think. For one of course uniting two Hughes brothers but they also really need some help on the blue line. | |
| 6 |  | - | Either him or Lucius but I prefer Johnson and with him they could solve their Center depth. | |
| 7 |  | - | They will solve their goalie issues for years to come. The kid has Vezina potential. | |
| 8 |  | - | With Edvinsson they add a potential first pairing guy to their defense prospect pool. | |
| 9 |  | - | The 4 best Defensemen are already gone so they take BPA. | |
| 10 |  | - | Goal scorer, who will complement their young forward group well. | |
| 11 |  | - | Choix au repêchage retiré | |
| 12 |  | - | Top 6 winger potential. A Lysell-Suter-Reichel line would be really dangerous. | |
| 13 |  | - | I wasn't really sure who to pick so they take best Forward available. | |
| 14 |  | - | Flyers could really use some help on the back end | |
| 15 |  | - | They need young forward depth and he has the potential to be a Top 6 winger. | |
| 16 |  | - | NYR really need center depth and with Sillinger they get a potential Top 6 C who could also play with Lafreniere. | |
| 17 |  | - | Maybe a surprise for some but he can play all offensive positions and could play with Caufield as C or LW or with Suzuki. | |
| 18 |  | - | Blues should take a Defenseman and I see him being a 2nd pairing player. | |
| 19 |  | - | Also should go for Defense. Imo Chayka is the best Defenseman available so they take him. | |
| 20 |  | - | Helps their future offense group and is a very good special teams forward. | |
| 21 |  | - | Goaltending is a big need, with Smith already being 39 and Koskinen shouldn’t be their starter. Although Holland isn’t really the guy to pick a goalie in round 1. | |
| 22 | |  | I don’t think he is going any lower. Definitely Top 6 potential and they took a defenseman with their 1st so they take a forward now. | |
| 23 |  | - | Goal scoring is a bit of an issue and he could help with scoring for years. | |
| 24 | |  | If Cossa were available they’d take him but because he isn’t they take the best LD available. | |
| 25 | |  | Really good pick and a possible steal. Lowest I see him dropping. | |
| 26 |  | - | Helps their Center depth and is the best forward available. | |
| 27 | |  | Took a RW and C so now they take the best Defenseman available. | |
| 28 |  | - | They’re very deep so they pick BPA. | |
| 29 | |  | He fell quite a bit but Wild pick him up because the best defensemen are already off the board. | |
| 30 |  | - | From projected 1st overall to 30 but the Panthers pick him up because he’s the best player available. | |
| 31 |  | - | He’s good on special teams and could maybe turn into a 2nd line Center behind Aho. | |
| 32 |  | - | Vegas goes BPA. |
| RONDE 2 | ÉQUIPE | ORIGINAL | JOUEUR | DéTAILS |
|---|
| 33 | | - | After taking a defenseman 2nd overall they take the best Forward available. | |
| 34 | | - | Best Defenseman available. In this scenario, they lose Shattenkirk in the Expansion draft and take RD because they have more LD depth. | |
| 35 | | - | The Kraken take the best available forward. A for them steal, considering some see him going Top 20. | |
| 36 | | | Took a forward at 32, now take a defenseman. | |
| 37 | | | BPA | |
| 38 | | - | May be a bit early to pick him but I see Steve Y playing safe an d taking him here after not getting Cossa in the first round. | |
| 39 | | | RD who could be paired with Chabot or Sanderson. | |
| 40 | | - | The Kings add a RW to their very deep prospect pool. | |
| 41 | | - | ||
| 42 | | - | Sens pick a goalie because it’s the position they haven’t gone for yet and their prospect pool is lacking goalies too. | |
| 43 | | - | The Coyotes again take the best available (imo) | |
| 44 | | - | Hawks fill their second need on LD with Behrens. | |
| 45 | | - | Flames take the best available Winger. | |
| 46 | | - | Took a Defenseman in the 1st round, now they take a forward | |
| 47 | | - | ||
| 48 | | | ||
| 49 | | - | ||
| 50 | | | ||
| 51 | | - | ||
| 52 | | - | ||
| 53 | | | ||
| 54 | | | ||
| 55 | | | ||
| 56 | | - | ||
| 57 | | | ||
| 58 | | - | ||
| 59 | | - | ||
| 60 | | | ||
| 61 | | - | ||
| 62 | | - | ||
| 63 | | - | ||
| 64 | | |
| RONDE 3 | ÉQUIPE | ORIGINAL | JOUEUR | DéTAILS |
|---|
| 65 | | | ||
| 66 | | - | ||
| 67 | | - | ||
| 68 | | - | ||
| 69 | | - | ||
| 70 | | - | ||
| 71 | | - | ||
| 72 | | - | ||
| 73 | | - | ||
| 74 | | - | ||
| 75 | | | ||
| 76 | | | ||
| 77 | | - | ||
| 78 | | - | ||
| 79 | | - | ||
| 80 | | - | ||
| 81 | | | ||
| 82 | | - | ||
| 83 | | - | ||
| 84 | | - | ||
| 85 | | | ||
| 86 | | - | ||
| 87 | | - | ||
| 88 | | | ||
| 89 | | - | ||
| 90 | | - | ||
| 91 | | | ||
| 92 | | - | ||
| 93 | | | ||
| 94 | | | ||
| 95 | | - | ||
| 96 | | |
CapFriendly
CapFriendly