SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sens

Créé par: Cabbie91
Équipe: 2024-25 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 25 juin 2024
Publié: 25 juin 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2900 000 $
33 750 000 $
12 650 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 750 000 $
21 750 000 $
Transactions
OTT
  1. Laughton, Scott
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (FLA)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (PHI)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de FLA
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de DET
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de FLA
Logo de PHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2026
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de FLA
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2288 000 000 $87 857 381 $850 000 $600 000 $142 619 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 350 000 $8 350 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
900 000 $900 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 050 000 $8 050 000 $
DG
UFA - 8
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
805 000 $805 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 juin à 7 h 46
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 7,642
Mentions "j'aime": 2,102
that dont get chych, ott declines
25 juin à 7 h 52
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2024
Messages: 60
Mentions "j'aime": 7
Flyers say no we aint giving you picks for any player you can have laughton for picks tho
25 juin à 7 h 58
#3
It's Just a Guess
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2023
Messages: 29
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: athrin
that dont get chych, ott declines


You mean that doesnt get Laughton and Philly's 1st
sk540 a aimé ceci.
25 juin à 9 h 1
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,073
Mentions "j'aime": 657
Quoting: athrin
that dont get chych, ott declines


That would absolutely get Chych and you know it
25 juin à 9 h 1
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,073
Mentions "j'aime": 657
Quoting: mactad
You mean that doesnt get Laughton and Philly's 1st


Exactly!
25 juin à 9 h 10
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 7,642
Mentions "j'aime": 2,102
Quoting: mactad
You mean that doesnt get Laughton and Philly's 1st


that is FLA 1st so 32nd OA and laughton is worth a 2nd at most. chych has far far more value than a career 3rd liner and 32nd
25 juin à 9 h 11
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 7,642
Mentions "j'aime": 2,102
Quoting: sk540
That would absolutely get Chych and you know it


a career 3rd liner who is worth a 2nd max and 32nd OA dont get a top 4 dman in his prime not even close
25 juin à 10 h 0
#8
It's Just a Guess
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2023
Messages: 29
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: athrin
that is FLA 1st so 32nd OA and laughton is worth a 2nd at most. chych has far far more value than a career 3rd liner and 32nd


Quoting: athrin
a career 3rd liner who is worth a 2nd max and 32nd OA dont get a top 4 dman in his prime not even close


as you know there are intangibles that you dont see in the box score for players and Laughton is one of those players. Plus, one has to wonder why Ottawa is so eager to Trade this "top 4 dman" on a team that its defense is suspect
sk540 a aimé ceci.
25 juin à 10 h 5
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 7,642
Mentions "j'aime": 2,102
Quoting: mactad
as you know there are intangibles that you dont see in the box score for players and Laughton is one of those players. Plus, one has to wonder why Ottawa is so eager to Trade this "top 4 dman" on a team that its defense is suspect


low IQ you are uh, OTT has Sanderson, Chabot, Branny, Kleven and chych, that is 5 LD, chych and chabot cannot play RD, so one has to go and it looks like it will be chych. and laughton has no intangibles, OTT can get experienced/leadership vets for cheaper cap wise and keep their assets in UFA.
25 juin à 10 h 12
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,073
Mentions "j'aime": 657
Quoting: mactad
as you know there are intangibles that you dont see in the box score for players and Laughton is one of those players. Plus, one has to wonder why Ottawa is so eager to Trade this "top 4 dman" on a team that its defense is suspect


Took the words out of my mouth.
25 juin à 10 h 14
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,073
Mentions "j'aime": 657
Quoting: athrin
low IQ you are uh, OTT has Sanderson, Chabot, Branny, Kleven and chych, that is 5 LD, chych and chabot cannot play RD, so one has to go and it looks like it will be chych. and laughton has no intangibles, OTT can get experienced/leadership vets for cheaper cap wise and keep their assets in UFA.


Keep their assets? It's one asset. You are receiving a 1st and a 3rd and a guy who most of the league considers a bigger value than just his stats. Which, if you did any research, you would see he returned to his 2022-23 form later in the year. A guy who can play up and down the lineup, can put in 30-35 points, plays on the PK, and is a great leader in the room. Just because you don't like him, doesn't mean he has more value than just what you see on stats websites.
25 juin à 10 h 21
#12
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 7,642
Mentions "j'aime": 2,102
Quoting: sk540
Keep their assets? It's one asset. You are receiving a 1st and a 3rd and a guy who most of the league considers a bigger value than just his stats. Which, if you did any research, you would see he returned to his 2022-23 form later in the year. A guy who can play up and down the lineup, can put in 30-35 points, plays on the PK, and is a great leader in the room. Just because you don't like him, doesn't mean he has more value than just what you see on stats websites.


he does not hold the value you think he does, just like bruins fan who thought they were going to get chych or Pinot or even 7th for Ulmark, laughton will return a 2nd round pick, hes not worth a 1st and this offer dont comes close to getting chych. if OTT did a Joseph for laughton trade, Philly adds
25 juin à 10 h 27
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,073
Mentions "j'aime": 657
Quoting: athrin
he does not hold the value you think he does, just like bruins fan who thought they were going to get chych or Pinot or even 7th for Ulmark, laughton will return a 2nd round pick, hes not worth a 1st and this offer dont comes close to getting chych. if OTT did a Joseph for laughton trade, Philly adds


No they wouldn't because they wouldn't make that trade in the first place. It's basically the same player, Laughton at his peak is a better value than Joseph in the same vein. I don't know how youre not seeing this but luckily most of the league would agree with us, and if he is traded, you will see.
25 juin à 10 h 30
#14
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 7,642
Mentions "j'aime": 2,102
Quoting: sk540
No they wouldn't because they wouldn't make that trade in the first place. It's basically the same player, Laughton at his peak is a better value than Joseph in the same vein. I don't know how youre not seeing this but luckily most of the league would agree with us, and if he is traded, you will see.


Joseph is younger and better than laughton
25 juin à 11 h 41
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,073
Mentions "j'aime": 657
Quoting: athrin
Joseph is younger and better than laughton


Younger, yes. Better, no.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage