SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Offseason

Créé par: Crapbag
Équipe: 2024-25 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 16 juin 2024
Publié: 17 juin 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 450 000 $
31 100 000 $
31 100 000 $
31 450 000 $
33 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
35 000 000 $
38 000 000 $
38 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Celebrini, Macklin
3950 000 $
Offres hostiles
Le salaire annuel moyen (AAV) de l'offre hostile est calculé en divisant la valeur totale du contrat par: 1. La durée totale du contrat, ou 2. Cinq ans
JOUEURAAVCOMPENSATION
Boqvist, Jesper1 450 000 $Aucune compensation
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Joseph, Mathieu
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (OTT)
OTT
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (PIT)
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (VGK)
2.
CBJ
  1. Chmelevski, Alexander [Liste de réserve]
  2. Kostin, Klim
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (TBL)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
2026
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2388 000 000 $80 437 500 $0 $4 050 000 $7 562 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C, AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 2
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Celebrini, Macklin
950 000 $950 000 $
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 200 000 $$3M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, C
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
RFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 juin à 15 h 54
#1
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 12,408
Mentions "j'aime": 4,717
San Jose can have Mathieu Joseph for the #42 overall pick in the upcoming draft.

San Jose can have the #7 overall pick for the #14 overall pick + Vegas' 1st in 2025.
17 juin à 16 h 14
#2
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,438
Mentions "j'aime": 1,101
Quoting: sensonfire
San Jose can have Mathieu Joseph for the #42 overall pick in the upcoming draft.

San Jose can have the #7 overall pick for the #14 overall pick + Vegas' 1st in 2025.


Joseph is not worth anywhere near the 42nd overall, and it would not cost an unprotected 1st to move up 7 spots.

This should already 100% be out of the question for the Sharks. ADDING a 1st to move up 7 spots is such a massive overpay
17 juin à 16 h 24
#3
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 12,408
Mentions "j'aime": 4,717
Quoting: AStovetop
Joseph is not worth anywhere near the 42nd overall, and it would not cost an unprotected 1st to move up 7 spots.

This should already 100% be out of the question for the Sharks. ADDING a 1st to move up 7 spots is such a massive overpay


https://puckpedia.com/pickvalue
17 juin à 16 h 25
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 7,496
Mentions "j'aime": 2,055
OTT declines
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
17 juin à 16 h 30
#5
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,438
Mentions "j'aime": 1,101
Holy Overpay on the Pesce and Skjei. I like them both but 3 x 8 is crazy.

Also, what's the point of even bring in Skjei if you're not moving Ferraro. It's just adding to the logjam at LD and preventing Shakir a shot at the NHL.

I do like Teuvo though. May cost a bit more though. Laine would likely cost more as well.
17 juin à 16 h 35
#6
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,438
Mentions "j'aime": 1,101
Quoting: sensonfire
https://puckpedia.com/pickvalue


That's great, this is not how it works in the real world. If it was top 25 protected I'd say yes, but it's not. Vegas could have a similar year that NJ/PIT had this year, in which case that value is massively skewed considering next years draft is very deep.
17 juin à 16 h 50
#7
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 12,408
Mentions "j'aime": 4,717
Quoting: AStovetop
That's great, this is not how it works in the real world. If it was top 25 protected I'd say yes, but it's not. Vegas could have a similar year that NJ/PIT had this year, in which case that value is massively skewed considering next years draft is very deep.


This is how it works in the real world:


1. Each team will make a list of the 225 best prospects for the upcoming draft in a hotel boardroom somewhere.

2. On that same list, each team will assign a numerical trade value to each of those 225 prospects.

3. On the day of the draft, when it is Ottawa's turn to pick at #7, the phone rings from another team asking for that pick.



4. That team makes an offer for the #7 pick, taking into account ...

------- their own list of the same prospects
--------the numerical trade value they've assigned to the BPA at #7 from their perspective
--------how much draft capital or liquidable assets they have to spare to acquire the #7 pick.



5. Ottawa then either accepts or declines the offer.

It's that simple.
17 juin à 17 h 40
#8
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,438
Mentions "j'aime": 1,101
Quoting: sensonfire
This is how it works in the real world:


1. Each team will make a list of the 225 best prospects for the upcoming draft in a hotel boardroom somewhere.

2. On that same list, each team will assign a numerical trade value to each of those 225 prospects.

3. On the day of the draft, when it is Ottawa's turn to pick at #7, the phone rings from another team asking for that pick.



4. That team makes an offer for the #7 pick, taking into account ...

------- their own list of the same prospects
--------the numerical trade value they've assigned to the BPA at #7 from their perspective
--------how much draft capital or liquidable assets they have to spare to acquire the #7 pick.



5. Ottawa then either accepts or declines the offer.

It's that simple.


Great, we're agreed. It's all subjective on the draft strength, available players at the time of the trade, internal value of their own picks and prospects, etc.. In other words, it can't be assumed by a very basic calculator. I provided real world context why it Doesn't make sense for the Sharks and why the value would be very skewed.

Essentially it boils down to the uncertainty of where that Vegas pick will be. If it has a lot of protections on it, I'd be game to move a late 1st with 14, but it doesn't.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage