SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What Could Be

Équipe: 2024-25 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 31 mai 2024
Publié: 1 juin 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Both trades are clear overpays by the leafs, as marner is worth much more than Jones with 1 mil retained. Point is that even with egregious overpays our roster could still look something like this. Thankfully, it likely costs much less based on comparable trades.

LEAFS FANS: Not saying I'd do this as this would not be great value, but the point is to show what kind of roster we could have. Hakanpaa is the type of D that partners best with rielly, but if he doesn't work out then move mccabe into the top 4 and let timmins, hakanpaa or niemela fight it out for the last spot. Lots of options here.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
1775 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
44 000 000 $
55 500 000 $
1775 000 $
22 000 000 $
45 000 000 $
21 375 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (BOS)
WSH
  1. Järnkrok, Calle
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
2.
OTT
  1. Liljegren, Timothy [Droits de RFA]
  2. Robertson, Nicholas [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (BOS)
Détails additionnels:
Leafs re-sign chychrun at 7x7 which ends up being a steal pretty quickly. Another obvious overpay that Ottawa would be stupid to refuse. Point is, a chychrun trade is possible and probably costs much less.
3.
TOR
  1. Jones, Seth (1 000 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
3 team trade where team acquiring marner send futures to chicago for jones with retention. Marner is worth more than Jones even with retention, so this is more than enough to make this happen. Point is, I think a Jones trade is very possible with even more than 1 mil of retention, and for less than what a marner trade would return.
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de NSH
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2287 700 000 $87 696 334 $0 $0 $3 666 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
13 250 000 $13 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 500 000 $11 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
904 667 $904 667 $
AG, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
875 000 $875 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
856 667 $856 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
843 333 $843 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
875 000 $875 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $ (200 000 $$200K200 000 $$200K)
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
816 667 $816 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
851 667 $851 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
875 000 $875 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
817 778 $817 778 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 juin à 12 h 23
#26
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 2,381
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: Sprak
Jones signed a max-term, NMC deal with a terrible Chicago team that only won 28 games, so put two and two together here


28 games? How long was the season that year? Convenient way to phrase it. It's not as if he had free reign over where to play. He did know that CBJ was locked into rebuilding, and CHI was looking to make one last run with toews, Kane and Keith. They also had some promising young guys like debrincat, Hagel, strome and dach.

I certainly don't imagine he expected a scorched earth rebuild one year after chicago made that trade and signed him to that contract. His situation is not unlike karlssons in Pittsburgh or chychruns in Ottawa, and I'm confident if a trade to a better team available he'd waive his, not the teams NMC.
1 juin à 23 h 58
#27
Caps fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 560
Mentions "j'aime": 167
Quoting: Affectionate_Side_64
28 games? How long was the season that year? Convenient way to phrase it. It's not as if he had free reign over where to play. He did know that CBJ was locked into rebuilding, and CHI was looking to make one last run with toews, Kane and Keith. They also had some promising young guys like debrincat, Hagel, strome and dach.

I certainly don't imagine he expected a scorched earth rebuild one year after chicago made that trade and signed him to that contract. His situation is not unlike karlssons in Pittsburgh or chychruns in Ottawa, and I'm confident if a trade to a better team available he'd waive his, not the teams NMC.


20-21 they finished 6th in their conference after finishing 7th the season before. 21-22 was a full 82-game season. They went 28-42-12. They finished 7th in their conference bro, you're not that smart.
2 juin à 0 h 39
#28
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 2,381
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: Sprak
20-21 they finished 6th in their conference after finishing 7th the season before. 21-22 was a full 82-game season. They went 28-42-12. They finished 7th in their conference bro, you're not that smart.


You're right, I mixed up the years when checking. Point stands, because the rebuild/ tear down didn't start until after he signed.

Even smart people make clerical errors, but I don't know how many smart people would think that's the type of acquisition a rebuilding team makes, almost the opposite really. Glad you got a bit of a win here at least.
3 juin à 22 h 5
#29
Caps fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 560
Mentions "j'aime": 167
Modifié 4 juin à 21 h 45
Quoting: Affectionate_Side_64
You're right, I mixed up the years when checking. Point stands, because the rebuild/ tear down didn't start until after he signed.

Even smart people make clerical errors, but I don't know how many smart people would think that's the type of acquisition a rebuilding team makes, almost the opposite really. Glad you got a bit of a win here at least.


You don't sign a long-term contract with a team that just finished 7th in their division and not have some qualms about the fact that they might not make it back. Also, that's a bad point. The pen's just traded for EK65 and still missed the playoffs, teams trick themselves into thinking they don't need to rebuild all the time, it doesn't change the fact that they still need a teardown.
4 juin à 17 h 8
#30
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 2,381
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: Sprak
You don't sign a long-term contract with a team that just finished 7th in their division and not have some qualms about the fact that they might not make it back. Also, that's a bad point. The pen's just traded for EK65 and still made the playoffs, teams trick themselves into thinking they don't need to rebuild all the time, it doesn't change the fact that they still need a teardown.


Ah, the pens made the playoffs did they? There goes your credibility!

"Bro, you're not that smart."
4 juin à 21 h 45
#31
Caps fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 560
Mentions "j'aime": 167
Quoting: Affectionate_Side_64
Ah, the pens made the playoffs did they? There goes your credibility!

"Bro, you're not that smart."


a simple spelling mistake and you're acting like this lol, you didn't argue against my point while still understanding what i meant otherwise
5 juin à 15 h 26
#32
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 2,381
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: Sprak
You don't sign a long-term contract with a team that just finished 7th in their division and not have some qualms about the fact that they might not make it back. Also, that's a bad point. The pen's just traded for EK65 and still missed the playoffs, teams trick themselves into thinking they don't need to rebuild all the time, it doesn't change the fact that they still need a teardown.


You misspelled "missed" as "made"? Nice save!

This might be one of the best examples of karma I've seen in awhile, appreciate the laugh!
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage