SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Free Agency

Créé par: Jphaxx
Équipe: 2024-25 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 13 mai 2024
Publié: 14 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Verbeek has stated that he's looking for scoring winger and RHD. I imagine he's looking for more leadership qualities in both of those players. RHD might be expensive on the open market, curious if they can weaponize their cap space and draft capital to get something done here. So maybe explore potential trades with teams with cap issues, as they may come cheaper, but i really didn't see anything out there that would benefit either side.

For Stamkos, I think we've seen Verbeek's tendency to tack on an extra year to attract FAs (Gudas, Killorn, Strome, Vatrano). Maybe not in Vatrano's case but i definitely feel that the other 3 likely got 1 more year than what was out there for them. I think the right term for Stammer is 2 years, but i suspect it wil take 3-4 years to get it done. In my scenario, I like offering more short term cash, as going too long could complicate their ability to sign all these guys coming off ELCs in a couple years. Stamkos would be a massive add in terms of helping this team transition towards trying to become winners and gives them a bonafide leader in the room to help groom the next captain. I think it's worth the mega overpay it would take to attract him and as long as the term isn't crazy, it'll be well worth it.

Some of these RFA guys, i'm not sure about. Could qualify Jones, Vaak, Lundestrom, Leason, Lacombe or could just trade their rights somewhere. Who knows. Verbeek says he's looking for more out of the Bottom 6. So returning with basically the same bottom six doesn't seem like that'd be the answer unless he feels they've shown growth.

Rather than having the traditional top 6, a checking line and a 4th energy line, This team could just have a "top 9" and a 4th line as far as minutes are distributed. I'm higher on Zegras than I think most are and i think he deserves to play with guys who can finish his passes.

I think there will only be one significant RHD, so it's not adding a Hakanpaa AND Tanev, but just one. I'm looking at more veteran D men that I don't think will require long term commitments to attract but rather overpaying short term, so I think they're out on younger guys like sean walker, Demelo, Carrier, Pesce, etc. or more specifically guys that will require a lot of term to attract. I'd love to acquire John Manson somehow, but now with Nichushkin's situation, I think CO doesn't really need to trade him anymore as I'm imagining a scenario where CO can terminate his contract in 6 months time. That's 7 mil off their books.

True cap space is after Stammer and an RHD @ 5 mil is around 8 mil. So there's room to take on a contract and move things around if they see fit.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2950 000 $
2950 000 $
2950 000 $
11 800 000 $
11 000 000 $
31 000 000 $
21 300 000 $
11 300 000 $
11 200 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
25 000 000 $
212 600 000 $
23 000 000 $
1950 000 $
23 000 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de EDM
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2025
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de EDM
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2026
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2783 500 000 $86 844 167 $0 $8 250 000 $-3 344 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance950 000 $$950K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 250 000 $$3M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 3
12 600 000 $12 600 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance800 000 $$800K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
844 167 $844 167 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
812 500 $812 500 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
RFA
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
950 000 $950 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 mai à 13 h 49
#1
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 11,097
Mentions "j'aime": 7,883
Christ above, that's way too much money for Stamkos.

Make it 9 and it might be reasonable. Second someone on the roster goes over 10 and everyone will want north of 10
Jphaxx et GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
14 mai à 13 h 52
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 86
Mentions "j'aime": 32
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Christ above, that's way too much money for Stamkos.

Make it 9 and it might be reasonable. Second someone on the roster goes over 10 and everyone will want north of 10


lol, i'm just thinking that someone else could come in nd pay him 3x9... but hoping to attract him with the bigger figure and the right term for this team, which i believe to be 2 years. I guess if they offered him 3x9, that wouldn't be awful
14 mai à 13 h 56
#3
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 11,097
Mentions "j'aime": 7,883
Quoting: Jphaxx
lol, i'm just thinking that someone else could come in nd pay him 3x9... but hoping to attract him with the bigger figure and the right term for this team, which i believe to be 2 years. I guess if they offered him 3x9, that wouldn't be awful


I dunno man, I've been watching him recently, he's definitely lost a step. As a trigger man he's still fine but it's kind of like Ovi, you need to let him set up at the dot for the one timer and everything else is becoming more and more useless. I'm worried we're going to start relying on the kids up front too much to cover for the fact that we'd have too many old pylons on the roster.
14 mai à 13 h 58
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,341
Mentions "j'aime": 13,289
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Christ above, that's way too much money for Stamkos.

Make it 9 and it might be reasonable. Second someone on the roster goes over 10 and everyone will want north of 10


$9,500,000 is my absolute max on a 2 year deal

Like you said, we can make prices sky high because we have so many mouths to feed the next 2 years — we need to hope all the youngsters love Anaheim & eachother and all want to take on the old Boston everyone takes a small pay cut to keep the squad together
Jphaxx a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage