SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Shattenbuck

Créé par: RecycleShark
Équipe: 2024-25 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 25 avr. 2024
Publié: 26 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
33 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 500 000 $
12 500 000 $
Transactions
TBL
  1. Rutta, Jan
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (WPG)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
Logo de TBL
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de VGK
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
2026
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $65 801 667 $0 $1 807 500 $17 698 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
941 667 $941 667 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, C
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 200 000 $5 200 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
RFA
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 avr. à 6 h 24
#1
Miss YA Killer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 3,847
Mentions "j'aime": 1,451
Julien Brisebois LAUGHS HYSTERICALLY IN GRIERS FACE BEFORE HANGING UP AND BLOCKING HIS NUMBER.
Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
26 avr. à 6 h 38
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 1,346
Mentions "j'aime": 613
Modifié 26 avr. à 7 h 58
Are San Jose fans really this F***ING stupid or are there just a rash of trolling San Jose posts? Not a f***ING Snowballs chance in Tampa in August They Trade Cernak for Burroughs or Jan F***ING Rutta and a 5th or really at all
Boltsradynasty a aimé ceci.
26 avr. à 8 h 24
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 2,819
Mentions "j'aime": 1,024
Please give one intelligent and rational explanation why Tampa Bay remotely considers that trade? TB counters David Edstrom for a 26 7th.. which is as realistic as the pile of manure proposed above
26 avr. à 10 h 18
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 9,021
Mentions "j'aime": 10,911
Well this is better than Cernak for Burroughs. But still an easy no from Tampa Bay.
Boltsradynasty a aimé ceci.
26 avr. à 11 h 52
#5
Démarrer sujet
RecycleShark
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,024
Mentions "j'aime": 293
Quoting: Dan_the_Man
Please give one intelligent and rational explanation why Tampa Bay remotely considers that trade? TB counters David Edstrom for a 26 7th.. which is as realistic as the pile of manure proposed above


This article said that Cernak is TB's worst contract:
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10116169-the-worst-contracts-on-every-nhl-team-for-the-2023-24-season

This article suggested that Chicago could get Cernak for a 3rd
https://thehockeywriters.com/lightning-blackhawks-could-be-trade-deadline-partners-again/

I thought about just offering a 3rd for Cernak, but I needed to move a RD to make room for him and I figured Rutta had some value, plus a good past relationship with TB and Hedman.
Cernak is clearly better than Rutta (which is why the Sharks would do this), but from the articles I read it appeared that TB might need to trade Cernak for cap reasons.
26 avr. à 14 h 25
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 2,819
Mentions "j'aime": 1,024
Modifié 26 avr. à 14 h 38
Quoting: RecycleShark
This article said that Cernak is TB's worst contract:
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10116169-the-worst-contracts-on-every-nhl-team-for-the-2023-24-season

This article suggested that Chicago could get Cernak for a 3rd
https://thehockeywriters.com/lightning-blackhawks-could-be-trade-deadline-partners-again/

I thought about just offering a 3rd for Cernak, but I needed to move a RD to make room for him and I figured Rutta had some value, plus a good past relationship with TB and Hedman.
Cernak is clearly better than Rutta (which is why the Sharks would do this), but from the articles I read it appeared that TB might need to trade Cernak for cap reasons.


Whoever wrote that article should either put the crackpipe down or completely pull their head out of their a$$ because they're absolutely clueless. If TB thought Rutta was worth close to that he'd be wearing blue and white with a lightning bolt already.
Justafan79 et Boltsradynasty a aimé ceci.
26 avr. à 15 h 9
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 1,346
Mentions "j'aime": 613
Quoting: RecycleShark
This article said that Cernak is TB's worst contract:
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10116169-the-worst-contracts-on-every-nhl-team-for-the-2023-24-season

This article suggested that Chicago could get Cernak for a 3rd
https://thehockeywriters.com/lightning-blackhawks-could-be-trade-deadline-partners-again/

I thought about just offering a 3rd for Cernak, but I needed to move a RD to make room for him and I figured Rutta had some value, plus a good past relationship with TB and Hedman.
Cernak is clearly better than Rutta (which is why the Sharks would do this), but from the articles I read it appeared that TB might need to trade Cernak for cap reasons.


Show me one time with the cap hell TB has been involved with when they signed a player for 6 or more years and traded them within 2 years? Don't waste your time it hasn't happened under this ownership.it isn't how TB operates.
Dan_the_Man et Boltsradynasty a aimé ceci.
27 avr. à 8 h 16
#8
Miss YA Killer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 3,847
Mentions "j'aime": 1,451
Quoting: RecycleShark
This article said that Cernak is TB's worst contract:
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10116169-the-worst-contracts-on-every-nhl-team-for-the-2023-24-season

This article suggested that Chicago could get Cernak for a 3rd
https://thehockeywriters.com/lightning-blackhawks-could-be-trade-deadline-partners-again/

I thought about just offering a 3rd for Cernak, but I needed to move a RD to make room for him and I figured Rutta had some value, plus a good past relationship with TB and Hedman.
Cernak is clearly better than Rutta (which is why the Sharks would do this), but from the articles I read it appeared that TB might need to trade Cernak for cap reasons.


So 5.2 million for a top pair shutdown RD is their worst contract says to me they don't have any bad contracts, and giving 7 years of Cernak for a piss ant 4 the and a guy TB allowed to walk for nothing is utterly moronic.
27 avr. à 16 h 33
#9
Démarrer sujet
RecycleShark
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,024
Mentions "j'aime": 293
Quoting: Boltsradynasty
So 5.2 million for a top pair shutdown RD is their worst contract says to me they don't have any bad contracts, and giving 7 years of Cernak for a piss ant 4 the and a guy TB allowed to walk for nothing is utterly moronic.


OK. Maybe this was a bad trade idea, but it is still better than the actual Tanner Jeannot trade.

Here's another article saying that TB needs to trade Cernak in order to free up cap space.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/10109841-the-player-every-team-should-shop-at-the-2024-nhl-trade-deadline.amp.html

Last year when Florida needed to clear cap, the Sharks were able to pick up Anthony Duclair for just a 5th and Steven Lorentz.

What do you think is a fair trade for Cernak? A 2nd?

Good luck to the Bolts today.
27 avr. à 20 h 30
#10
Miss YA Killer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 3,847
Mentions "j'aime": 1,451
Quoting: RecycleShark
OK. Maybe this was a bad trade idea, but it is still better than the actual Tanner Jeannot trade.

Here's another article saying that TB needs to trade Cernak in order to free up cap space.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/10109841-the-player-every-team-should-shop-at-the-2024-nhl-trade-deadline.amp.html

Last year when Florida needed to clear cap, the Sharks were able to pick up Anthony Duclair for just a 5th and Steven Lorentz.

What do you think is a fair trade for Cernak? A 2nd?

Good luck to the Bolts today.


I think TBs cap situation is massively overblown . Stamkos will take a very club friendly deal or walk. I think trading Cernak would be a mistake of epic proportions
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage