SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lets bench Tocchet

Créé par: kingkanuck
Équipe: 2023-24 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 25 avr. 2024
Publié: 25 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
SOMETIMES I FEEL THAT HE IS ONE OF THOSE COACHES THAT WOULD LOSE JUST TO MAKE A POINT.
I ALSO FEEL THAT HE MAY NOT LIKE CERTAIN PLAYERS BASED ON THINGS OTHER THAN THEIR PERFORMANCE ON THE ICE.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de SJS
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2026
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2583 500 000 $85 041 528 $850 000 $880 000 $-1 541 528 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
883 750 $883 750 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
786 111 $786 111 $ (Bonis de performance30 000 $$30K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $
G
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 avr. à 15 h 37
#1
ht42
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 2,497
Mentions "j'aime": 711
That's likely the 1st real experience of playoffs for somes players like Hughes, Petterson, etc.

I watched the games, but they REALLY looks nervous......
25 avr. à 15 h 51
#2
Canucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 839
Mentions "j'aime": 349
This is why people hate Canucks fans.. lol. Really?

You actually think the Tocc wants this group to lose?

Please explain this.
25 avr. à 16 h 50
#3
Démarrer sujet
AN "ORIGINAL SIX"
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 1,772
Mentions "j'aime": 183
Quoting: Tmclean64


This is why people hate Canucks fans.. lol. Really?
You actually think the Tocc wants this group to lose?
Please explain this.


Why would anyone hate Canucks fans? Except for those embarassing minor incidents, in 1972 and 2011, Canucks are among the most lovable fans in the league

It's not that these coaches WANT to lose but some definitely seem willing to sit players based on how they expect them to perform. Some would sit their best player because he missed a checking assignment and lose the game. This may be okay during the regular season but it definitely isn't during the playoffs. The playoffs shouldn't be used as a "teaching moment".
How does Hoglander rate less TOI than Lafferty and just 5 seconds more than PDG? These players aren't even near as good as Hoggy. He should be playing on the first or second line.
The team is having trouble scoring, so how does playing the player who scored the 4th most goals (8th most points) for the team for less than 10 minutes help?

I get that MAYBE Tocchet got cocky and thought he could play a some what inferior lineup but with Demko missing, the Canucks need their best possible lineup and the best possible line combinations.
Pulling names out of a hat and throwing them together because a line had a bad shift is poor coaching.
Maybe Tocchet is just as nervous as the players?
25 avr. à 18 h 18
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 508
Mentions "j'aime": 220
You get a coach that turns a team of under achievers that missed the playoffs in recent years into one of the best teams in the league yet still complain? LOL.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage