SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The best team possible - does not mean realistic or likely

Créé par: dons_weeney
Équipe: 2024-25 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 23 avr. 2024
Publié: 23 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I would never actually do this lol. It would be good for 1-2 years but still not a contender. Real problem is the lack of 1C, but they'll never be bad enough to get one via draft.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
25 500 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
38 500 000 $
47 600 000 $
Transactions
BOS
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NJD
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2083 500 000 $83 491 667 $50 000 $542 500 $8 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
C
RFA - 2
7 600 000 $7 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 avr. à 22 h 16
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,818
Mentions "j'aime": 1,181
Quoting: dgibb10
that mark had Cory Schneider 2nd in the NHL over that span behind only Henrik

Swayman ranks 3rd, and is 2nd on his own team.

That's like comparing point totals from today to when Jamie Benn won the art ross. Is an 88 point scorer from this year better than Benn was then?


Goals above expected per 60 is a pretty neutral statistic that has been pretty consistent among league leaders for years even if non advanced statistics vary.

Swayman has been better. It’s not a rip on Schneider and yes … Ullmark has been the best goaltender in the league over a two year span.
23 avr. à 22 h 22
#27
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,996
Mentions "j'aime": 3,176
Quoting: Celtics21
Goals above expected per 60 is a pretty neutral statistic that has been pretty consistent among league leaders for years even if non advanced statistics vary.

Swayman has been better. It’s not a rip on Schneider and yes … Ullmark has been the best goaltender in the league over a two year span.


Not really. 26 goalies this year have a GSAx above 10. In 11-12 that number was 9 (I would have used 12-13 but it was the lockout year)

Nikolai Khabibulin was 10th in GSAx in 11-12 with 8.72
This year that would rank 28th, where Joseph Woll is.
23 avr. à 22 h 47
#28
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,818
Mentions "j'aime": 1,181
Quoting: dgibb10
Not really. 26 goalies this year have a GSAx above 10. In 11-12 that number was 9 (I would have used 12-13 but it was the lockout year)

Nikolai Khabibulin was 10th in GSAx in 11-12 with 8.72
This year that would rank 28th, where Joseph Woll is.


Filter by 30 starts. Showing people without scale seems like a reach. There are some anomaly years on there, but overall the leaders above .300

2024 - 6 leader at .557
2021 - 5 leader at .500
2018 - 9 leader at .695
2015 - 8 leader at .501
2012 - 5 leader at .557
2008 - 5 leader at 471

Leaders
Brian Elliot -.711 (2016)
Tim Thomas - .706 (2011)
Anti Rantaa -.695 (2018j
Igor Shesterkin -.666 (2022)
Kari Lehronen - .607 (2013)
Phillip Grubauer -.601 (2018)

Last year was a complete anomaly and then it returned to zero this year

Linus Ullmark - .883
Juuse Saros - .735
Jeremy Swayman -.715
Ilya Sorokin - .647
Filip Gustavsson - .628
23 avr. à 22 h 55
#29
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,996
Mentions "j'aime": 3,176
Quoting: Celtics21
Filter by 30 starts. Showing people without scale seems like a reach. There are some anomaly years on there, but overall the leaders above .300

2024 - 6 leader at .557
2021 - 5 leader at .500
2018 - 9 leader at .695
2015 - 8 leader at .501
2012 - 5 leader at .557
2008 - 5 leader at 471

Leaders
Brian Elliot -.711 (2016)
Tim Thomas - .706 (2011)
Anti Rantaa -.695 (2018j
Igor Shesterkin -.666 (2022)
Kari Lehronen - .607 (2013)
Phillip Grubauer -.601 (2018)

Last year was a complete anomaly and then it returned to zero this year

Linus Ullmark - .883
Juuse Saros - .735
Jeremy Swayman -.715
Ilya Sorokin - .647
Filip Gustavsson - .628


So what you're saying is Swayman has his numbers driven by a large anomaly season where almost as many goalies hit 0.600 GSAx/60 than the previous decade combined?
23 avr. à 23 h 10
#30
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,818
Mentions "j'aime": 1,181
Quoting: dgibb10
So what you're saying is Swayman has his numbers driven by a large anomaly season where almost as many goalies hit 0.600 GSAx/60 than the previous decade combined?


So that dismisses it?

He also followed it up by having better numbers this year than all but one of Schneider’s years throughout his career for whatever that means
23 avr. à 23 h 56
#31
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,996
Mentions "j'aime": 3,176
Quoting: Celtics21
So that dismisses it?

He also followed it up by having better numbers this year than all but one of Schneider’s years throughout his career for whatever that means

10-11: 8th in GSAx (0.789 GSAx/60 1st)
11-12: 6th in GSAx (0.547 GSAx/60 2nd behind Henrik)
12-13: 9th in GSAx (0.29 GSAx/60 7th)

Overall: 43.11 total, 4th in total GSAx, 0.524 GSAx/60 (2nd)

The rankings in GSAx over that time (minimum 45 games):

Henrik: 0.562
Schneider:0.524
Dubnyk: 0.380
Ward: 0.310
Luongo: 0.217
Rask: 0.214
Halak: 0.205

No other goalie was above 0.200


Swayman over the last 3 years is at

39.47 GSAx (9th), 0.340 GSAx/60 (7th if you don't count Stolarz, Varlamov, or Ingram)

Over the last 2 years he is 6th in total GSAx with 43.78, 1 spot ahead of Samuel Montembault.
And 3rd in GSAx/60.

In that time frame (minimum 45 games and this is a HARDER minimum to reach considering it's 2 years instead of 3):

Ullmark: 0.680
Stolarz: 0.617
Helle: 0.596
Swayman: 0.5737
Sorokin: 0.519
Varlamov: 0.453
Montembault: 0.443
Saros: 0.428
Rittich: 0.418
Shesty: 0.401
Andersen: 0.381
Ingram: 0.364
Skinner: 0.301
Daccord: 0.300
Markstrom: 0.293
Demko: 0.286
Pyotr: 0.286
Adin Hill: 0.266
Vasy: 0.227
Gustafsson: 0.211
Oetter: 0.206
Binnington: 0.205

So Swayman has a 0.574 in a time frame where 21 other goalies are above 0.200. Luongo was 5th over that time frame, he'd rank 20th in this time frame
Schneider has his 0.524 in a time frame where 6 other goalies are above 0.200
24 avr. à 8 h 23
#32
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,231
Mentions "j'aime": 7,011
Quoting: dgibb10
Cory Schneider was literally him.


1. that's a horrible use of the word literally
2. horrible use of the word him
3. no, he wasn't.
24 avr. à 16 h 19
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,818
Mentions "j'aime": 1,181
Quote:
So Swayman has a 0.574 in a time frame where 21 other goalies are above 0.200. Luongo was 5th over that time frame, he'd rank 20th in this time frame
Schneider has his 0.524 in a time frame where 6 other goalies are above 0.200


The only way this seems possible is goalies are facing more high danger chances and saving them on average? Just curious.

Also, this seems to point to how good Ullmark actually is
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage