LMAO, you actually think +/- is useful, your entire argument just became invalid. What a joke LOL

It is. You don't want to use it because KK's is **** after you tried claiming he's outstanding 5 on 5.

Tell me more about how defensively relied on he is with his 60% offensive zone starts LOLLLLLL.

No, even if KK's +/- was +1068, I wouldn't use it. It's garbage

You trying to use D-zone starts, LMAO. Every Hurricane has more O zone starts than D zone starts, and 80% of KK's starts are on the fly buddy

Fun story, I decided to go back and fact check this and made several fun observations...

1. The line you're talking about is Bunting/Kotkaniemi/Necas with an xGF/60 of 3.11. Funny thing... That makes it the 50th best xGF/60. So either we have 50 elite lines in the league or that's not elite territory.

2. Interesting that you didn't bring up the Bunting/Kotkaniemi/Necas lines xGA/60... Which is also 3.11. Which means they break even in expecting scoring. It's also the 29th worst xGA/60 line in the league. Soooo 50th best in xGF/60 but 29th worst xGA/60 isn't a good thing right?

3. That 3.11 xGA/60 is also Carolina's worst xGA/60 by a country mile. The next worst is Teravainen/Aho/Svechnikov at 2.44 xGA/60.

4. But I decided to take it a step further! Bunting/Kotkaniemi/Necas is 3.11 xGF/60 and 3.11 xGA/60. Bunting/Drury/Necas is 3.12 xGF/60 and 2.09 xGA/60. Necas/Drury/Noesen is 3.47 xGF/60 and 1.62 xGA/60.

Since I know you're a bit slow, that last point means that both Bunting and Necas are better offensively without KK on their line, and are EXPONENTIALLY better defensively without KK on their line.

RIP

My bad I meant skeji or however you spell it.

Skjei does, but Carolina already have his replacement with Orlov.