SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

And, this is why the Wild still have cap problems...

Créé par: MNBassman
Équipe: 2017-18 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 20 juill. 2017
Publié: 20 juill. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
All 3 of these contracts with the Wild's RFAs are reasonable and shouldn't be too far off of what actually (should) happen). The problem is: The Wild don't have enough cap space to properly manage the daily roster to account for injuries, call ups, etc. I still think the Wild might have to look into trading a player. I would consider Granlund, Zucker, or Ennis being the three most likely candidates...
If YOU were GM of your favorite team, what reasonable offer would YOU make for any or all of these players? Thanks in advance!!
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
45 850 000 $
75 000 000 $
42 100 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de VGK
Logo de BUF
Logo de MIN
Logo de WSH
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2019
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2020
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2275 000 000 $72 009 424 $0 $745 000 $2 990 576 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 8
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
C
UFA - 2
5 850 000 $5 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AD, C
RFA - 3
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
5 187 500 $5 187 500 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
4 166 667 $4 166 667 $
DG
UFA - 4
700 000 $700 000 $
G
UFA - 1
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 juill. 2017 à 15 h 9
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 33
Mentions "j'aime": 3
I assumed Granlund was higher priority than Niederreiter and would get the longer term, but I could be wrong?? As a Flames fan, the player I would most covet from the Wild would be RW Coyle. Because you are asking for Cap Relief, the only returns CGY could offer would be in the form of prospects like Jankowski, Shinkaruk, Kylington. Do you think a package of Ferland, Kylington, and Goalie M. McDonald would be enough?
Ennis too expensive for Flames, maybe Zucker - but wouldn't be enough of upgrade from what we've got. Would love Granlund, but can't fit him into Flames Cap as well.
20 juill. 2017 à 18 h 47
#2
Démarrer sujet
MNBassman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 8,231
Mentions "j'aime": 3,593
Quoting: RipperRob
I assumed Granlund was higher priority than Niederreiter and would get the longer term, but I could be wrong?? As a Flames fan, the player I would most covet from the Wild would be RW Coyle. Because you are asking for Cap Relief, the only returns CGY could offer would be in the form of prospects like Jankowski, Shinkaruk, Kylington. Do you think a package of Ferland, Kylington, and Goalie M. McDonald would be enough?
Ennis too expensive for Flames, maybe Zucker - but wouldn't be enough of upgrade from what we've got. Would love Granlund, but can't fit him into Flames Cap as well.


The way I look at it is Granlund might have the higher ceiling, but he is small and has had some concussion problems in the past, while Neiderrieter is a durable workhorse, much bigger, and a player I (and a lot of Wild fans) would rather invest long-term in. Both are VERY good defensive player (Granlund does not get enough credit for his defense). Both (should) pass up Parise on the depth chart this season and hopefully that means Neiderrieter will get more minutes...like he deserves. Granlund has been fed minutes by the brass since he first touched the ice for the Wild... Last year was his all-around breakout season...not just offensively. He's a very, very good player...I would just prefer to invest longer term into a larger, more durable one.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage