SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Wings without adding new UFAs or trades made

Créé par: FireLordZuk0
Équipe: 2024-25 Red Wings de Detroit
Date de création initiale: 22 mars 2024
Publié: 22 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Yzerman following his TB roots here where he signed Hedman to 5x$4m and Kuch 3x$4.76m. You have to think Yzerman might go this route. it works for both the players and the team short and long term
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 750 000 $
21 250 000 $
57 000 000 $
35 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
24 000 000 $
11 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DAL
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de NJD
2025
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de BOS
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de STL
2026
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2287 500 000 $82 932 640 $0 $850 000 $4 567 360 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD
UFA
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
905 833 $905 833 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
5 100 000 $5 100 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
RFA
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 4
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
RFA
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
900 000 $900 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
2 343 750 $2 343 750 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 mars à 15 h 40
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 10,492
Mentions "j'aime": 8,125
I could definitely see him trying that route but I feel, with the way they keep improving, they should try to lock up to long term deals. I feel 7.7 for Raymond and 8.7 for Seider would be reasonable.
FireLordZuk0 a aimé ceci.
22 mars à 16 h 27
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 487
Mentions "j'aime": 134
Quoting: Lancebmx
I could definitely see him trying that route but I feel, with the way they keep improving, they should try to lock up to long term deals. I feel 7.7 for Raymond and 8.7 for Seider would be reasonable.


I agree they should try and get them on 7-8yr deals, but if you want to improve this team next season and moving forward, they have to move a player or two via buyout or trade. Ik this goes against some wings fans, but I would 100% start hearing what other orgs would trade to get jake walman. Yes he scores some clutch goals, but he is not a top pair dman, does not tie up players well on the pk, and same with Hronek you want to trade him before he asks for a ridiculous contract and you get something in return outside of what hes done for the org on and off the ice. Then of course you have Petry, Holl, Fabbri, and Husso to name some. Out of all these names, Walman would get the highest return possible outside of cap. This would create room for Edvinsson, Chiarot and Seider top pair seems to be working for now, and the team has gone back2back wins without him in the lineup, and i believe theyve lost only once with walman out of the lineup.

Long rant story short, if we want this team to improve, and sign seider and raymond to those long term high dollar contracts, you gotta move some pieces one way or the other.
22 mars à 17 h 8
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 10,492
Mentions "j'aime": 8,125
Quoting: FireLordZuk0
I agree they should try and get them on 7-8yr deals, but if you want to improve this team next season and moving forward, they have to move a player or two via buyout or trade. Ik this goes against some wings fans, but I would 100% start hearing what other orgs would trade to get jake walman. Yes he scores some clutch goals, but he is not a top pair dman, does not tie up players well on the pk, and same with Hronek you want to trade him before he asks for a ridiculous contract and you get something in return outside of what hes done for the org on and off the ice. Then of course you have Petry, Holl, Fabbri, and Husso to name some. Out of all these names, Walman would get the highest return possible outside of cap. This would create room for Edvinsson, Chiarot and Seider top pair seems to be working for now, and the team has gone back2back wins without him in the lineup, and i believe theyve lost only once with walman out of the lineup.

Long rant story short, if we want this team to improve, and sign seider and raymond to those long term high dollar contracts, you gotta move some pieces one way or the other.


Chiarot and Seider didn't work well pre-Walman, but I think with Seider improved that it could be viable. I agree Walman isn't the ideal top pair defenseman but right now he's the best we got. If we move him, we take a major step back. I would be waiting until next trade deadline at the earliest to see how Edvinsson does with a full season. If he could step in and fill that hole than for sure. With the term on his contract, we can afford to wait.

As for the contracts, I think it depends where they see this team in the 3-5 year range. If they are willing to sign for 4-5 years and Yzerman sees this team as a true contender in that time frame, then they definitely should. Those contracts would provide huge value at that point. If Yzerman doesn't see this team as a true contender in that time frame, then we should be trying to get long term value contracts signed. Ideally something that, although not quite worth it right now, should provide really good value in 3+ years.
I also feel, with the UFAs they signed and the contracts handed out, that very few of these players would be considered core players and are in the long term plan. The only players I consider to be long term core players for this team, that are currently on the roster, are Larkin, Raymond, Seider, Edvinsson and possibly Debrincat. The rest, including Walman, are short term stop gap fixes until they have internal options ready.
I still feel this team has a long way to go before they are a true contender but improving the team now is obviously important.
22 mars à 18 h 53
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 708
Mentions "j'aime": 383
Don't have to think Yzerman would go this route at all.

Difference between now and when Yzerman signed Hedman and Kuch is the cap didn't get held back for four straight seasons. Starting next year the cap is about to propel forward at max increases for probably the next five years, minimum.

Zero need to sign Seider to a 5 year deal and put him right into UFA at 28 with a ~$105M salary cap. Great way to put yourself in a position where he's demanding $12M - $13M.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage