SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Blow-Up and Glow-Up

Créé par: HCSG
Équipe: 2024-25 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 27 févr. 2024
Publié: 27 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
3925 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1875 000 $
1875 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1850 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
11 200 000 $
22 600 000 $
32 750 000 $
1950 000 $
65 750 000 $
24 750 000 $
68 850 000 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Broberg, Philip [Droits de RFA]
  2. Campbell, Jack
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
Includes Mattias Janmark
2.
PIT
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (FLA)
Détails additionnels:
Includes Jason Zucker
ARI
  1. Rakell, Rickard
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
3.
PIT
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (NJD)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (NJD)
NJD
  1. Graves, Ryan (2 000 000 $ retained)
4.
PIT
  1. Brisson, Brendan
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (VGK)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (VGK)
VGK
  1. Smith, Reilly
Détails additionnels:
Includes Jake Guentzel w/ 50% Retention
5.
PIT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (CAR)
CAR
    Alex Nedeljkovic w/ 50% Retention
    6.
    OTT
    1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (VGK)
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (VGK)
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de NYR
    2025
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    2026
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de CHI
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2387 500 000 $87 454 342 $0 $0 $45 658 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    875 000 $875 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    8 850 000 $8 850 000 $
    AD
    UFA
    5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
    AD, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    875 000 $875 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 2
    4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    925 000 $925 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    C, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
    G
    UFA
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    775 000 $775 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 1
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    DD
    UFA
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    900 000 $900 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    925 000 $925 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    800 000 $800 000 $
    DD
    UFA

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    27 févr. à 18 h 19
    #26
    I Love J Boqvist
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2023
    Messages: 11,990
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,174
    Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
    That's not how things work. Graves left NJ because NJ has/have a bevy of young dmen ready to make the jump and wanted to keep Meier. NJ had different priorities which had nothing to do with Graves' value.

    As far as your other thoughts, I honestly don't even know what you're getting at. My point is a good proven player having a bad year doesn't make him a cap-dump or in position for his team to have to retain or pay another team to take him. I also stated that if he was two years in and nothing changed? Then yeah, they'd probably have to pay or retain.

    In this scenario, GM's will recognize a good player with a bad year/bad fit and capitalize by acquiring him at a discounted price. If Graves was moved, the Pens probably get a 3rd, maybe a little less or they may have to take another contract back with a player in a similar situation. That's like saying NJ would have to retain on Meier if they wanted to move him and we both know that's not the case and relative to Graves' season, Meier is having a far worse one.


    NJD decided Ryan Graves wasn’t worth 4.5 million x 6 years to them (probably even less as historically players will take less to not have to move their family)

    And unless you’re suggesting Graves took a discount to play in Pittsburgh, it’s likely that almost all of the other teams in the NHL decided the same.
    27 févr. à 18 h 21
    #27
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 9,687
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
    Quoting: dgibb10
    Which part is incorrect? Are you denying the fact that all 32 teams had the opportunity to sign Ryan Graves this offseason for 4.5 million (or more if they valued him as such), if they wished without giving up any assets.

    Are you denying graves struggles this year?

    Are you denying graves 12 team NTC that would prevent a number of potential suitors from acquiring him at all?


    Your general thought-process is wrong. I'm not sure why you're asking weird questions. I completely stated earlier that Graves has not been a good fit. Every situation with a player is different on why they may be on the outs with their respective teams, but you're treating this like some kind of math equation and that's now how this goes down.

    Yes, the clause affects things, but it only limits the teams they can negotiate with and the leverage they have in the type of return they can get, which is why I stated in a situation like with Graves, the likely scenario is this...

    1) They get a low return on a team who will take him, i.e. maybe they get a 4th.
    2) They may have to take a contract back with a player in a similar situation, i.e. let's say VAN is interested. You could see a trade, maybe even straight up for Mikheyev.

    Now, as i stated a few times already, if Graves just completely year 2 of his contract and he's been bad in both his years of this contract? Then yes, the Pens would likely either have to tack on a pick/prospect to move him or possibly retain.
    27 févr. à 18 h 22
    #28
    I Love J Boqvist
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2023
    Messages: 11,990
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,174
    Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
    Trust me when I tell you, as someone who's worked in the industry, you're wrong.


    But humour me.

    Name me a team with the cap space, the need at LD, that wouldn’t be 1 of the 12 teams on graves NTC, that wants graves at 4.5 mill that he wouldn’t sign with in the offseason at said 4.5.
    27 févr. à 18 h 22
    #29
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 9,687
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
    Quoting: dgibb10
    NJD decided Ryan Graves wasn’t worth 4.5 million x 6 years to them (probably even less as historically players will take less to not have to move their family)

    And unless you’re suggesting Graves took a discount to play in Pittsburgh, it’s likely that almost all of the other teams in the NHL decided the same.


    Your logic here is 100% wrong. NJ didn't decide Graves wasn't worth that. NJ decided to prioritize getting their young dmen in the lineup rather than signing an older player long-term who would block their place in the lineup, which was the right thing to do.
    27 févr. à 18 h 23
    #30
    I Love J Boqvist
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2023
    Messages: 11,990
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,174
    Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
    Your general thought-process is wrong. I'm not sure why you're asking weird questions. I completely stated earlier that Graves has not been a good fit. Every situation with a player is different on why they may be on the outs with their respective teams, but you're treating this like some kind of math equation and that's now how this goes down.

    Yes, the clause affects things, but it only limits the teams they can negotiate with and the leverage they have in the type of return they can get, which is why I stated in a situation like with Graves, the likely scenario is this...

    1) They get a low return on a team who will take him, i.e. maybe they get a 4th.
    2) They may have to take a contract back with a player in a similar situation, i.e. let's say VAN is interested. You could see a trade, maybe even straight up for Mikheyev.

    Now, as i stated a few times already, if Graves just completely year 2 of his contract and he's been bad in both his years of this contract? Then yes, the Pens would likely either have to tack on a pick/prospect to move him or possibly retain.


    I could see you taking another cap dump back for graves yes.

    Again, you’ve failed to answer this simple question. If a team wanted graves at 4.5 million+, why did they not sign graves when he was available as an unrestricted free agent at said price?
    27 févr. à 18 h 24
    #31
    I Love J Boqvist
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2023
    Messages: 11,990
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,174
    Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
    Your logic here is 100% wrong. NJ didn't decide Graves wasn't worth that. NJ decided to prioritize getting their young dmen in the lineup rather than signing an older player long-term who would block their place in the lineup, which was the right thing to do.


    No, that’s what they did with Severson. There was a logjam there with Nemec Casey Hamilton and Marino.

    On the left side there was no real logjam. They just decided graves wasn’t worth the money over that term.

    If NJD wanted graves at 4.5 million they’d have signed graves at 4.5 million
    27 févr. à 18 h 25
    #32
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 9,687
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
    Quoting: dgibb10
    No, that’s what they did with Severson. There was a logjam there with Nemec Casey Hamilton and Marino.

    On the left side there was no real logjam. They just decided graves wasn’t worth the money over that term.

    If NJD wanted graves at 4.5 million they’d have signed graves at 4.5 million


    Wrong. Being a NJD fan doesn't mean you know more than I do on this, by the way. Graves and Severson were gone to make room, but also free up cash to spend on Meier.
    27 févr. à 18 h 25
    #33
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 9,687
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
    Quoting: dgibb10
    I could see you taking another cap dump back for graves yes.

    Again, you’ve failed to answer this simple question. If a team wanted graves at 4.5 million+, why did they not sign graves when he was available as an unrestricted free agent at said price?


    I didn't fail to answer anything. I gave you the answer in another reply.
    27 févr. à 18 h 27
    #34
    I Love J Boqvist
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2023
    Messages: 11,990
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,174
    Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
    I didn't fail to answer anything. I gave you the answer in another reply.


    I have yet to see an answer. You said something inaccurate about NJD having a logjam on the left. But again, that logjam still exists and so NJD would still not want graves at 4.5.

    Which team wanted graves at 4.5 and why didn’t they just sign him?
    27 févr. à 18 h 28
    #35
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 9,687
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
    Quoting: dgibb10
    I have yet to see an answer. You said something inaccurate about NJD having a logjam on the left. But again, that logjam still exists and so NJD would still not want graves at 4.5


    Here's how it played out...

    The Devils have a bevy of young dmen ready to start making their way in. Graves wanted a long-term contract and NJ didn't want to commit the time to a 2nd pairing dman when they have all these guys getting ready to make the jump.

    The other factors are Bratt and Meier. They prioritized spending their money on key forwards.

    Please though, continue to tell me how I'm not answering your questions.
    27 févr. à 18 h 32
    #36
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 9,687
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
    @digibb10

    Also, you have a Siegenthaler, Bahl and Hughes on the left. Young dmen. Signing Graves would have blocked your younger guys from coming up. This isn't rocket science.
    27 févr. à 19 h 58
    #37
    I Love J Boqvist
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2023
    Messages: 11,990
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,174
    Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
    Here's how it played out...

    The Devils have a bevy of young dmen ready to start making their way in. Graves wanted a long-term contract and NJ didn't want to commit the time to a 2nd pairing dman when they have all these guys getting ready to make the jump.

    The other factors are Bratt and Meier. They prioritized spending their money on key forwards.

    Please though, continue to tell me how I'm not answering your questions.


    If graves was worth 4.5 million in our eyes we’d have kept him.

    For example

    Siegs-Hamilton
    Graves-Marino
    Luke-Bahl (Luke started the year on the right side, Nemec was meant to stay in the AHL this year)

    And kept Yegor instead of bringing in toffoli.

    We didn’t think Graves was worth 4.5 million.

    The problem with gravy was by the end of the year Bahl (not a top elite level prospect) was playing BETTER than graves. Hence, graves was not worth 4.5 million.
    27 févr. à 20 h 1
    #38
    I Love J Boqvist
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2023
    Messages: 11,990
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,174
    Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
    digibb10

    Also, you have a Siegenthaler, Bahl and Hughes on the left. Young dmen. Signing Graves would have blocked your younger guys from coming up. This isn't rocket science.


    Bahl isn’t a top priority dman who we needed to save a spot for.

    Even now NJD is targeting a veteran dman such as Hanifin. Again, if we thought graves was worth the money we’d have kept him and either shipped out Bahl, or not bought Miller.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage