SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Modest retool to try and qualify

Créé par: markykins1
Équipe: 2023-24 Capitals de Washington
Date de création initiale: 14 févr. 2024
Publié: 14 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
GMBM says he's in a tough spot between (that's the key word) doing right by Ovi, Oshie, Carlson and adding young talent for the future. This might get them in the playoff or might fail, but the costs here are not a disaster to the teams future. Might he actually buy for the vets and give them a shot in the arm? Who knows...
Transactions
1.
WSH
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
BOS
  1. van Riemsdyk, Trevor (1 000 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
To any playoff team that needs bottom pair help.
2.
WSH
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (CAR)
CAR
  1. Pacioretty, Max (1 000 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
to any top playoff team for cup run
3.
WSH
  1. Dumba, Matt
Détails additionnels:
AZ gets young middle six center on the come
ARI
  1. Lapierre, Hendrix
Détails additionnels:
Caps get top 4 rental to enhance D for a playoff run
4.
SJS
  1. Milano, Sonny
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (WSH)
Détails additionnels:
Caps wont pay a 1st for anyone as a rental this year, but I think Duclair would help the Caps the rest of the year. Low risk add.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de WSH
Logo de BOS
Logo de CAR
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de BOS
Logo de COL
Logo de WSH
Logo de BOS
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2026
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $73 814 167 $20 000 $82 500 $9 685 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 166 667 $5 166 667 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
775 000 $775 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
789 167 $789 167 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AD, AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
762 500 $762 500 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 675 000 $2 675 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 062 500 $2 062 500 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Capitals de Washington
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 200 000 $9 200 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
825 000 $825 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 févr. à 8 h 55
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 8,036
Mentions "j'aime": 3,235
Pass. This team isn't good enough. Sell all you can and bomb for a draft pick. Trading Lap for a bad rental D is very bad asset management.
NoVaSpartan a aimé ceci.
14 févr. à 9 h 2
#2
Démarrer sujet
twentyeighteen
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 1,251
Mentions "j'aime": 497
Quoting: ClockReads2113
Pass. This team isn't good enough. Sell all you can and bomb for a draft pick. Trading Lap for a bad rental D is very bad asset management.


Well then any top 4 D to push others down would do. There is risk in every move any GM makes and they don't lose a ton here. I have been all for selling but this is just some alternative thoughts if Bmac actually does the unexpected and bolsters the team with 2 added players to try and qualify. I would not hate if he could get 1 or 2 players for the line up with out giving away his 1st rounders. Maybe AZ would take less? I thought of Savard but he is a 2 year rental that the Caps wouldn't do I think, although he'd be a better add to the top 4.
14 févr. à 9 h 49
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 8,036
Mentions "j'aime": 3,235
Quoting: markykins1
Well then any top 4 D to push others down would do. There is risk in every move any GM makes and they don't lose a ton here. I have been all for selling but this is just some alternative thoughts if Bmac actually does the unexpected and bolsters the team with 2 added players to try and qualify. I would not hate if he could get 1 or 2 players for the line up with out giving away his 1st rounders. Maybe AZ would take less? I thought of Savard but he is a 2 year rental that the Caps wouldn't do I think, although he'd be a better add to the top 4.


I hear ya but don't know if it's possible. Lap can't be used for a bad rental and Milano is on pace for the same amount of points but is younger, cheaper, and better. If you want to make moves to be better now then go hard and get some young kids back with term so you can be good now and for the future.
14 févr. à 10 h 49
#4
Fantasy Hockey Pro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 5,162
Mentions "j'aime": 2,286
This team is definitely not making the playoffs at this point. This run they've been on of late has cemented that. Rentals shouldn't be targets, and I think Lapierre should not be moved unless it is in a package for a young player who can make an impact.
14 févr. à 12 h 3
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 2,844
Mentions "j'aime": 834
AZ does this even if lapierre is AHL/scratch C, AZ has little depth at C
14 févr. à 13 h 38
#6
Démarrer sujet
twentyeighteen
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 1,251
Mentions "j'aime": 497
Quoting: brady_t12
This team is definitely not making the playoffs at this point. This run they've been on of late has cemented that. Rentals shouldn't be targets, and I think Lapierre should not be moved unless it is in a package for a young player who can make an impact.


Ok well then a lesser prospect in that Dumba trade then...I just think this kind of buying I have here, wouldn't kill the picks and prospects pool. And if you don't make the playoffs you can still draft high and do things in the summer to make one more run in September. Or you can continue to move guys and add young pieces this summer too. I just don't see something like I have here as a disaster if they were to miss the playoffs. They probably do what they did last year, sell some and try to add a young guy and I am fine with that but doing some buying might spark the vets and the coaching staff to another level and it might work out, you never know.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage