Rangers would just trade picks for Hayes

Like what? I figured if you're trying to move KK, why not hit two birds with one stone.

Unless KK gets more value in a separate deal

Rangers aren’t trying to move Kakko lol Drury is hearing offers but doesn’t mean he’ll entertain them

Penguins decline, would rather keep Smith.

Red Wings very easily decline.
Pellikka is a non-start in any trade, let alone one that's basically a rental.

Very odd trade that Detroit declines

Pellikka back from injury today 🥳

Here’s to hoping he recovers and picks right back up!

- Uhh sure, but can't see NYR doing that.

- For me, absolutely not. Don't want ASP or to pay what he would cost, don't want to use up trade value for picks outside the top 35-40, would love Frenchy but he's a UFA anyway. If we're trading Buch, I want a far more suitable package that meets our needs. This doesn't qualify in my book. Wings say no anyway.

- I mean... with retention it becomes more attractive, but don't see why PITT would do it.

- As of right now today, huge no thanks. We're short Faulk and Perunovich, and playing Tucker, so Scandyman is absolutely needed. Unless you want Krug on PK1. Maybe later for this trade, but not now.

Love buchy but I can't see them moving ASP, if you want a secondary d prospect like Wallinder maybe.

ngl not interested in hayes, lets talk buch tho

I would imagine one of either Miller or Robertson have to be part of the deal with a 2024 1st at least with more finishing touches based on what the main piece is.

Id give robertson for sure, fine with shopping the first as well. @ 50% retained that helps both teams.