SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Goodrow Buyout Makes Things Sustainable for 24-25

Créé par: Shakabakes
Équipe: 2024-25 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 3 déc. 2023
Publié: 3 déc. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 500 000 $
23 500 000 $
45 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 250 000 $
2800 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2025
Logo de NYR
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYR
Logo de MIN
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2026
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2288 000 000 $87 671 801 $512 500 $622 500 $328 199 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 325 000 $2 325 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance450 000 $$450K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 437 500 $4 437 500 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA
Logo de Rangers de New York
867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Rangers de New York
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 666 667 $5 666 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 872 000 $3 872 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
812 500 $812 500 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Rangers de New York
787 500 $787 500 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 déc. 2023 à 9 h 12
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 5,335
Mentions "j'aime": 2,338
Lmao way too much for Schneider and Bonino

Kakko will probably be forced to accept his QO of $2.4m
Shakabakes a aimé ceci.
3 déc. 2023 à 10 h 21
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,991
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: Rags21
Lmao way too much for Schneider and Bonino

Kakko will probably be forced to accept his QO of $2.4m


I went higher on purpose, just in case. Better to show what room they have even while slightly "maxed" out.

If those Contracts stay in the more projected range, then even more wiggle room.
3 déc. 2023 à 10 h 25
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 5,335
Mentions "j'aime": 2,338
Quoting: Shakabakes
I went higher on purpose, just in case. Better to show what room they have even while slightly "maxed" out.

If those Contracts stay in the more projected range, then even more wiggle room.


With the extra money they could probably bring back Gus, unless another team offers him a lot
Shakabakes a aimé ceci.
3 déc. 2023 à 10 h 29
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,991
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: Rags21
With the extra money they could probably bring back Gus, unless another team offers him a lot


I think Gus will be too pricy for the Rangers, but perhaps a better upgrade over Jones.
3 déc. 2023 à 10 h 33
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 5,335
Mentions "j'aime": 2,338
Quoting: Shakabakes
I think Gus will be too pricy for the Rangers, but perhaps a better upgrade over Jones.


Jones honestly hasn’t been that bad. Him and Schneider just need Vet partners and not to be paired together

Next year I’d go:
KAM-Fox
Jones-Trouba
Lindgren-Schneider
3 déc. 2023 à 11 h 3
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 601
Mentions "j'aime": 180
Im ok with that number for Kakko if its a 3 year or 4 year deal. He hasn't broken out quite like Chytil did so can't give him that deal, and we need to see more production from him overall.
I absolutely do not want to move him though. I think he's definitely a top 6 forward. I think he's great defensively and at a style of game thats perfect for the playoffs, but we need to see more overall production first.
Shakabakes a aimé ceci.
3 déc. 2023 à 12 h 2
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,991
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: Rags21
Jones honestly hasn’t been that bad. Him and Schneider just need Vet partners and not to be paired together

Next year I’d go:
KAM-Fox
Jones-Trouba
Lindgren-Schneider


KAM and Fox are the aggressive, Offensive minded Defensemen. They need anchors like Trouba and Lindgren to back them up while they perform. Doesn't work.
3 déc. 2023 à 12 h 15
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 5,335
Mentions "j'aime": 2,338
Quoting: Shakabakes
KAM and Fox are the aggressive, Offensive minded Defensemen. They need anchors like Trouba and Lindgren to back them up while they perform. Doesn't work.


That is not true at all lol. In a small sample, KAM and Fox dominate together and fox works well with anyone

It’s actually the opposite. Trouba and Lindgren need puck movers to help them clear the zone better because they’re strictly defensive and not good with the puck
3 déc. 2023 à 13 h 26
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,991
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: Rags21
That is not true at all lol. In a small sample, KAM and Fox dominate together and fox works well with anyone

It’s actually the opposite. Trouba and Lindgren need puck movers to help them clear the zone better because they’re strictly defensive and not good with the puck


And Jones and Lindgren aren't puck movers.

Having your 2 best Offensive Defenseman together will limit Offensive production. Unless you have them racking up more TOI than the other 2 pairings combined, it's better to spread them out
3 déc. 2023 à 13 h 50
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 5,335
Mentions "j'aime": 2,338
Quoting: Shakabakes
And Jones and Lindgren aren't puck movers.

Having your 2 best Offensive Defenseman together will limit Offensive production. Unless you have them racking up more TOI than the other 2 pairings combined, it's better to spread them out


Lol what are you watching? Jones is an offensive defenseman and a great puck mover. That’s his bread and butter. He’s just super undersized

Zac jones is 2nd of all defensemen on the team in total assist/60 and 3rd in total points/60. 3rd in CF% and 1st in GF and xGF all at even strength lol
3 déc. 2023 à 14 h 53
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,991
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: Rags21
Lol what are you watching? Jones is an offensive defenseman and a great puck mover. That’s his bread and butter. He’s just super undersized

Zac jones is 2nd of all defensemen on the team in total assist/60 and 3rd in total points/60. 3rd in CF% and 1st in GF and xGF all at even strength lol


He's our 7th Defenseman who gets manhandled often in the Defensive Zone and put up one Primary Assist before getting sat down again. While he definitely looked more comfortable, let's not get carried away with the fancy stats.
3 déc. 2023 à 14 h 57
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 5,335
Mentions "j'aime": 2,338
Quoting: Shakabakes
He's our 7th Defenseman who gets manhandled often in the Defensive Zone and put up one Primary Assist before getting sat down again. While he definitely looked more comfortable, let's not get carried away with the fancy stats.


Like I said lol he needs a defensive Vet to play with. Let’s not act like Schneider is any better than Jones. But the whole point was that you said Jones isn’t a puck mover which is incorrect
3 déc. 2023 à 15 h 31
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,991
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: Rags21
Like I said lol he needs a defensive Vet to play with. Let’s not act like Schneider is any better than Jones. But the whole point was that you said Jones isn’t a puck mover which is incorrect


He's bounced in and out of the Lineup for a dozen games or so for each of the last 4 Seasons. I doubt his Defensive partner is to fault for each of those small spurts.

Their Top 4 have been paired accordingly for the last 4 or 5 Seasons. Even with some occasional swapping to experiment a bit, they've predominantly stayed as they are now. If they haven't paired KAM with Fox on a Full Time basis by now, they're not going to.
3 déc. 2023 à 15 h 37
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 5,335
Mentions "j'aime": 2,338
Quoting: Shakabakes
He's bounced in and out of the Lineup for a dozen games or so for each of the last 4 Seasons. I doubt his Defensive partner is to fault for each of those small spurts.

Their Top 4 have been paired accordingly for the last 4 or 5 Seasons. Even with some occasional swapping to experiment a bit, they've predominantly stayed as they are now. If they haven't paired KAM with Fox on a Full Time basis by now, they're not going to.


Jones’ only partners have been Brendan Smith, Hajek, Harpur and Schneider lol not exactly anyone good

Yea that’s fine they don’t need to change the top 4. But to say Jones isn’t good is incorrect. Because then you can say Schneider hasn’t been good until he got a Vet partner (Gus)
3 déc. 2023 à 15 h 44
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,991
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: Rags21
Jones’ only partners have been Brendan Smith, Hajek, Harpur and Schneider lol not exactly anyone good

Yea that’s fine they don’t need to change the top 4. But to say Jones isn’t good is incorrect. Because then you can say Schneider hasn’t been good until he got a Vet partner (Gus)


I've always thought Schneider has been solid. Certain partners may sway the #'s in either direction, but he's always looked on point no matter who he's with.
3 déc. 2023 à 15 h 48
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 5,335
Mentions "j'aime": 2,338
Quoting: Shakabakes
I've always thought Schneider has been solid. Certain partners may sway the #'s in either direction, but he's always looked on point no matter who he's with.


I mean yea he’s solid but not great or terrible. Makes some good plays but also makes some stupid mistakes
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage