It's hard to say no, but I imagine there might be better value by trading them individually.

No one is giving a first for zadorov he likely brings back a 2nd half retained

How is Abruzzese negating 4 million of real money owed over Reaves contract? It cost Toronto a first to dump Marleau who had less term and less total money owed. Abruzzese is a 24 year old 180 pound center that can't crack a roster right now, he's closer to a group 6 UFA than he is a valuable piece in a trade.

"Random Idea" meanwhile i've seen 20 of these this week

Reaves doesn’t have that much negative value he can be waived and only cost 200k

Yeah right not exactly this

Sounds like the Leafs should do that then. 36, averaging 7 minutes a night, 1 fight which is sole job on any hockey team, hasn't played in nearly a month, total dollars owed is pretty important when it comes to dumping a contract, not the cap hit. This is another primo example of trying to dump one teams problems onto other team. As mentioned above, it cost a first to move Marleau who could probably still be a better player than Reaves at 44. Then to have to be committed to Reaves until he's almost 40 or longer due to buyout is out of this world

Ya a big random no .

It’s a good offer, I’d just like at least one replacement D-Man thrown in Timmins/Villenuev/Benoit as well

Your opinion was the only persons I really cared about lol