This is worse the the "LeafsMustWin" trolls posts. Why on earth is TO giving up by far the best player and loads of great assets so they can get Woll a different back up? Just the worst for TO. But I am pretty sure you are a Habs fan, so you know what you are doing here eh?

Sanheim >>>>> Timmins (and Giordano who gets bumped out of the lineup)
Seeler> Liljegren (and cheaper)
Frost >>>> Robertson (and Holmberg who gets bumped out of the lineup)
Hart >> Samsonov (and cheaper and pending RFA so the Leafs have control)

But, yes...

Nylander>>>>> Tippett

As for the picks...

2x1st for 3x2nds + $$$ retention seems about right to me!
and
5th and 7th 2024 for future 4th and 5th sounds about right to me as well!

I don't get where the valuation is so far off!

Issues I DO see...
From the Flyers side - I get it - they can just try and sign Nylander as a UFA - but there is no guarantee that they will be able to to. But to land a big fish like Nylander AND upgrade 2nds for 1sts while rebuilding is a BIG WIN!

From the Leafs side - Losing Nylander, especially after the start he has had is a big loss to the top 6, but to get a better G, a much improved D corp and extra depth up front in exchange for a player you may not be able to sign while also re-stocking the draft pick cabinet... that's a WIN!

And if signing Kane does come to fruition as a result of moving Nylander out - is there really much of a drop off in production in the top 6? yes, some, but not a TON I don't believe. And if Kane chooses NOT to sign with the Leafs - they have $1m in cap space to add someone at the deadline as/if needed. again - WIN!

Nylander is so much better than everyone coming to the leafs. It's deck chairs and Nylander. Just poor asset management

Getting NOTHING for Nylander would be poor asset management.

What are they getting for Nylander here? The 2 1sts they are losing and the best player to make some lateral moves around the lineup is just dumb.