SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Calgary fun

Créé par: dougbailey
Équipe: 2023-24 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 7 juill. 2023
Publié: 7 juill. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
34 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
CGY
  1. Beecher, John
  2. DeBrusk, Jake
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
BOS
  1. Hanifin, Noah
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (CGY)
3.
CGY
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2026 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Backlund, Mikael (2 350 000 $ retained)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de BOS
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2026
Logo de CGY
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $74 526 666 $0 $212 500 $8 973 334 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
825 000 $825 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
AG, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 juill. 2023 à 15 h 10
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 3,811
Mentions "j'aime": 1,551
Rangers are not trading Laffy for a one year Lindholm rental, keep dreaming.
7 juill. 2023 à 15 h 14
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 6,526
Mentions "j'aime": 2,806
Funny rangers trade
7 juill. 2023 à 15 h 17
#3
GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 4,042
Mentions "j'aime": 1,815
nice of you to want to help rangers out, but unfortunate they do not have the cap to take on Lindholm.
7 juill. 2023 à 15 h 18
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,833
Mentions "j'aime": 20,491
These trades are the definition of perpetual mediocrity
Erbas1915 a aimé ceci.
7 juill. 2023 à 15 h 32
#5
Grumpy Gorilla
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 118
Mentions "j'aime": 49
"Rangers are not trading Laffy for a one year Lindholm rental, keep dreaming"....

I agree that the Rangers don't really need a Center. But Lindholm is a 1st Line Center. "Laffy" hasn't exactly killed it it and has fallen way below expectations so far, especially when it matters. 7 Playoff games with zeros across the board last year did not help in the 1st round against the Devils.

The trade does not work because the Rangers don't need a center / but not because "Laffy" is a premium asset.
7 juill. 2023 à 15 h 33
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 6,526
Mentions "j'aime": 2,806
Quoting: Gag1
I agree that the Rangers don't really need a Center. But Lindholm is a 1st Line Center. "Laffy" hasn't exactly killed it it and has fallen way below expectations so far, especially when it matters. 7 Playoff games with zeros across the board last year did not help in the 1st round against the Devils.

The trade does not work because the Rangers don't need a center / but not because "Laffy" is a premium asset.


Yea he’s not a premium but I bet you can’t name that many cheap wingers playing 3rd line minutes and no PP time still getting 40 points lol
7 juill. 2023 à 15 h 39
#7
CupChaser
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 418
Mentions "j'aime": 85
Hahahahahahahahhahahaahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahaha

- Boston
7 juill. 2023 à 15 h 40
#8
Soggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 599
Mentions "j'aime": 191
Quoting: Gag1
"Rangers are not trading Laffy for a one year Lindholm rental, keep dreaming"....

I agree that the Rangers don't really need a Center. But Lindholm is a 1st Line Center. "Laffy" hasn't exactly killed it it and has fallen way below expectations so far, especially when it matters. 7 Playoff games with zeros across the board last year did not help in the 1st round against the Devils.

The trade does not work because the Rangers don't need a center / but not because "Laffy" is a premium asset.


You can view him how you want, you're right that his stats have been underwhelming so far. But he is still a "premium asset" to the Rangers because they have no reason to appraise him for any less in a trade.
7 juill. 2023 à 15 h 49
#9
Servant of Chaos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 1,113
Mentions "j'aime": 455
Quoting: Gag1
"Rangers are not trading Laffy for a one year Lindholm rental, keep dreaming"....

I agree that the Rangers don't really need a Center. But Lindholm is a 1st Line Center. "Laffy" hasn't exactly killed it it and has fallen way below expectations so far, especially when it matters. 7 Playoff games with zeros across the board last year did not help in the 1st round against the Devils.

The trade does not work because the Rangers don't need a center / but not because "Laffy" is a premium asset.


Rangers already have a better 1C with Zibanejad, and 2 guys at 2C level in Trocheck and Chytil. There is no need for Lindholm. And while Lafreniere had 0 in 7 the most recent playoffs, the entire team sucked. Panarin had a whole 2 points, none at 5v5. Lafreniere also had 10 points in 21 games the previous year in the playoffs, so...
7 juill. 2023 à 16 h 8
#10
Grumpy Gorilla
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 118
Mentions "j'aime": 49
Quoting: Rags21
Yea he’s not a premium but I bet you can’t name that many cheap wingers playing 3rd line minutes and no PP time still getting 40 points lol


I am not dumping on "Laffy". My point was that your comment of "dream on" is misplaced.
Lindholm is a 1st line Center and a two way player with Selke potential. The Rangers don't need a Center (but if they did, it would cost a young player like this to get him).

RE: Name better players on a cheaper contact....
all entry level deals for young players look great especially when they produce. But Laffy was 140th in Even Strength Points which is decent but not outstanding. At this point Chytil looks more promising than Lafreniere or Kakko.
7 juill. 2023 à 16 h 15
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,291
Mentions "j'aime": 143
It’s a bit of an overpay on the hanafin trade. Debrusk is close to a 30 goal scorer. So not realistic to give up him and a first.
Gag1 a aimé ceci.
7 juill. 2023 à 16 h 15
#12
Grumpy Gorilla
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 118
Mentions "j'aime": 49
Quoting: FreeTacosAreBestTacos
Rangers already have a better 1C with Zibanejad, and 2 guys at 2C level in Trocheck and Chytil. There is no need for Lindholm. And while Lafreniere had 0 in 7 the most recent playoffs, the entire team sucked. Panarin had a whole 2 points, none at 5v5. Lafreniere also had 10 points in 21 games the previous year in the playoffs, so...


I agree. I don't think its a good trade because it does not address a need for both teams. The Rangers are deep down the middle and they don't need Lindholm. My objection was to the idea that Lindholm has significantly less value than Lafreniere...
7 juill. 2023 à 16 h 16
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 6,526
Mentions "j'aime": 2,806
Quoting: Gag1

I am not dumping on "Laffy". My point was that your comment of "dream on" is misplaced.
Lindholm is a 1st line Center and a two way player with Selke potential. The Rangers don't need a Center (but if they did, it would cost a young player like this to get him).

RE: Name better players on a cheaper contact....
all entry level deals for young players look great especially when they produce. But Laffy was 140th in Even Strength Points which is decent but not outstanding. At this point Chytil looks more promising than Lafreniere or Kakko.


I don’t think any team is trading 1st overall for aging vet. And the rangers already have Mika who’s an underrate 2 way center

lol chytil is entering his 7th season and is like 2/3 years older than both of them. I would sure hope he’s better than two guys who entered the league later
7 juill. 2023 à 16 h 58
#14
Grumpy Gorilla
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 118
Mentions "j'aime": 49
Quoting: Rags21
I don’t think any team is trading 1st overall for aging vet. And the rangers already have Mika who’s an underrate 2 way center

lol chytil is entering his 7th season and is like 2/3 years older than both of them. I would sure hope he’s better than two guys who entered the league later


Was he 1st overall (Yes). If they redrafted he would probably go 3rd (or maybe 4th). Lafreniere is a quality NHL player, but most people expected more, especially considering the fact he plays on a strong team with so much talent around him. Time will tell if he realizes his potential and what the Flames get for Lindholm....
7 juill. 2023 à 18 h 47
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 3,811
Mentions "j'aime": 1,551
Quoting: Gag1
"Rangers are not trading Laffy for a one year Lindholm rental, keep dreaming"....

I agree that the Rangers don't really need a Center. But Lindholm is a 1st Line Center. "Laffy" hasn't exactly killed it it and has fallen way below expectations so far, especially when it matters. 7 Playoff games with zeros across the board last year did not help in the 1st round against the Devils.

The trade does not work because the Rangers don't need a center / but not because "Laffy" is a premium asset.


Wrong. The trade does not work because the Rangers would get just 1 year of Lindholm and have to give up a 21 year old that has a lot of potential still. That is why the trade doesn't work for the Rangers.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage