Quoting: Caniac2000
Are you trying to argue Edmundson was a core part of either cup run? If that's the case, we need to end this here, because that is blatantly wrong.
The one time in Edmundson's career he was on a team that had expectations heading into the second half of a season, he was one of the worst defenseman in the league. Fact. St Louis were bottom of the league in January in their cup year, and the habs were expected to be swept aside by the Leafs. In Carolina, Edmundson was so bad they moved for Brady Skjei as an upgrade. Skjei who has shown even he can succeed in this Carolina system.
As I said, I have no issue with Edmundson. But he's a 3rd pairing defenseman on bad teams. He's kind of like a Jack Johnson. On a good team, he's a 7th D man which is fine if he's making league minimum. He's also fine to throw money at if you're rebuilding. Good locker room guy. For a team with cup expectations, he's not a good fit. He's proven that he doesn't work well on teams with expectations.
As for everything else, have fun with that. Edmundson is just not a good enough player for the Canes to do this. Have a good day!
See there you go again trying to bait me with "core part" as if thats a thing
There's Core Players and Role Players
Both are Vital to Cup runs since 2010 where no team without Depth in both categories has won a Cup
You need to Reframe the Subject to spin things so you're right in some regard.
Issue is your Characters been exposed and unlike most people who can admit when they've over reached or went too far.
You just continue and continue
So i broke down the stats and his impact in regards to where Eddy ranked with CAR D during the Regular Season and Playoffs .
We'll let the intelligent fans on this cite decide if someone offer intelligence or Conjecture is the winner of this Debate.
Check and Mate
Répondre
Slafkovsky,
CapFriendly
CapFriendly