SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

First Armchair GM my hope for Griers summer

Créé par: Brian_O_Blivion
Équipe: 2023-24 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 2 juin 2023
Publié: 2 juin 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
No big signings. Another high pick in 2024. Take Mantha to add some needed size in the top 6 (Eklund protection).

4 OA select Michkov. Fits our timeline perfectly. Potential generational talent, no brainer.
26 OA select Kasper Halttunen. Power forward with size and scoring ability can replace some of what we lost with Timo.
36 OA select Maxim Strbak. RHD with NHL size, physical, needs to work on composure with the puck and producing more offense. I really like this guy.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
2808 100 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
21 200 000 $
21 750 000 $
32 200 000 $
2975 000 $
1800 000 $
1975 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 375 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
ARI
  1. MacDonald, Jacob
  2. Simek, Radim
Détails additionnels:
Depth defensemen. Both only one year shouldn't be hard to move. Simek might need a sweetener but he is still solid. Makes room for Knyzhov. Anywhere that needs depth.
2.
SJS
  1. Mantha, Anthony
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (WSH)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (WSH)
WSH
  1. Lindblom, Oskar
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
Logo de SJS
Logo de CAR
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de WSH
Logo de CBJ
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
Logo de WSH
Logo de VGK
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $74 030 834 $25 000 $1 062 500 $9 469 166 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
912 500 $912 500 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
835 000 $835 000 $
DG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 juin 2023 à 11 h 53
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 82
Do you think they try to move Karlsson in the off-season or no?
2 juin 2023 à 11 h 57
#2
Démarrer sujet
Moo-kama-doo-lin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 937
Mentions "j'aime": 347
Quoting: Easton_H
Do you think they try to move Karlsson in the off-season or no?


I think it’s unlikely. Grier is selling super high and doesn’t want to eat too much retention. Karlsson was a different guy last year not just production but he was a better leader, a bit improved defensively and overall a better voice in the room. Without him our offense basically plummets.
2 juin 2023 à 12 h 24
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,190
Mentions "j'aime": 3,667
Quoting: Easton_H
Do you think they try to move Karlsson in the off-season or no?


If he wants to tank hard then yes he will trade him. Grier was on record saying that he isn’t itching to move a 100 point defenseman, he’s under contract with San Jose. It has to be an offer that works for San Jose, not just getting worked over because they don’t have to move him. Rumor was he only wanted to retain something like 18% of karlssons deal and 3 1st round picks worth in return but that was unconfirmed. I would imagine he tops out at 30% retention, similar to burns last offseason, but only if he gets what he wants in return.
2 juin 2023 à 12 h 26
#4
Démarrer sujet
Moo-kama-doo-lin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 937
Mentions "j'aime": 347
Quoting: glarson17
If he wants to tank hard then yes he will trade him. Grier was on record saying that he isn’t itching to move a 100 point defenseman, he’s under contract with San Jose. It has to be an offer that works for San Jose, not just getting worked over because they don’t have to move him. Rumor was he only wanted to retain something like 18% of karlssons deal and 3 1st round picks worth in return but that was unconfirmed. I would imagine he tops out at 30% retention, similar to burns last offseason, but only if he gets what he wants in return.


Grier laughed at the 3 1st’s rumor. But yeah I see the 30% being max. Karlsson is younger, better than Burns so the return has to be excellent.
glarson17 a aimé ceci.
2 juin 2023 à 12 h 27
#5
Hawks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,656
Mentions "j'aime": 1,688
Karlsson to Buffalo. $2M retained for 14OA. Done at the draft. (Note this is the bones of the deal. More to come to SJS likely)

Karlsson provides leadership to a young team and D core. They have the cap space. They’re a player away from playoff window opening.
2 juin 2023 à 13 h 9
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,190
Mentions "j'aime": 3,667
Quoting: Megalodon
Grier laughed at the 3 1st’s rumor. But yeah I see the 30% being max. Karlsson is younger, better than Burns so the return has to be excellent.


He younger, better, and hasn’t asked to leave unlike burns. Some people seem to think the sharks will get nothing for him. I don’t think their word is gospel by any means but Locked on sharks thought Karlsson would bring a burns like return which I thought was absurd.
2 juin 2023 à 13 h 10
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,284
Mentions "j'aime": 4,686
Quoting: Jco5ta5
Karlsson to Buffalo. $2M retained for 14OA. Done at the draft. (Note this is the bones of the deal. More to come to SJS likely)

Karlsson provides leadership to a young team and D core. They have the cap space. They’re a player away from playoff window opening.


I saw a Buffalo podcast post Karlsson 50% retained (let’s meet in the middle and say 3 mil) for Olofsson Ostlund and the 23 1st. Both the player we get at 13 plus Ostlund would be a nice return considering we essentially gave up Norris and Stuzie plus a few good picks and players to get him a few years ago.
Jco5ta5 a aimé ceci.
2 juin 2023 à 13 h 12
#8
Démarrer sujet
Moo-kama-doo-lin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 937
Mentions "j'aime": 347
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
I saw a Buffalo podcast post Karlsson 50% retained (let’s meet in the middle and say 3 mil) for Olofsson Ostlund and the 23 1st. Both the player we get at 13 plus Ostlund would be a nice return considering we essentially gave up Norris and Stuzie plus a few good picks and players to get him a few years ago.


50% retention would cost a heap more than that. Thats a crippling sum for any franchise to eat and frankly, is unprecedented and not realistic at all
2 juin 2023 à 13 h 12
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,284
Mentions "j'aime": 4,686
Quoting: glarson17
He younger, better, and hasn’t asked to leave unlike burns. Some people seem to think the sharks will get nothing for him. I don’t think their word is gospel by any means but Locked on sharks thought Karlsson would bring a burns like return which I thought was absurd.


Quoting: glarson17
He younger, better, and hasn’t asked to leave unlike burns. Some people seem to think the sharks will get nothing for him. I don’t think their word is gospel by any means but Locked on sharks thought Karlsson would bring a burns like return which I thought was absurd.

Depending on how much is retained we should get somewhere between what we paid for Karlsson and what we got for Burns. 50% retained should return 75/80% of what we paid and if we only retain 30% we should get about 1/2 what we paid for Karlsson. Zero retention would only garner about what Burns returned.
2 juin 2023 à 13 h 13
#10
Démarrer sujet
Moo-kama-doo-lin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 937
Mentions "j'aime": 347
Quoting: glarson17
He younger, better, and hasn’t asked to leave unlike burns. Some people seem to think the sharks will get nothing for him. I don’t think their word is gospel by any means but Locked on sharks thought Karlsson would bring a burns like return which I thought was absurd.


Locked on Sharks is not a viable source at all. JD is a fan not a source with connections to the brass.
glarson17 a aimé ceci.
2 juin 2023 à 13 h 14
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,284
Mentions "j'aime": 4,686
Quoting: Megalodon
50% retention would cost a heap more than that. Thats a crippling sum for any franchise to eat and frankly, is unprecedented and not realistic at all

Except with the sharks in rebuild mode with the intention of building a youth movement the cap hit on retention really doesn’t hurt us and would still be less than Min is dealing with on the 2 albatross buy outs the next few years.
2 juin 2023 à 13 h 14
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,284
Mentions "j'aime": 4,686
Quoting: Megalodon
Locked on Sharks is not a viable source at all. JD is a fan not a source with connections to the brass.


Well he has more connection than we do at least lol.
2 juin 2023 à 13 h 16
#13
Démarrer sujet
Moo-kama-doo-lin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 937
Mentions "j'aime": 347
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Well he has more connection than we do at least lol.


Not really. His only “connection” is Sheng and he manufactures storylines as clickbait on his site out of literally nothing. Masisak and Pashelka are the only insiders worth following. The only local ones anyway.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage