SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If Van wants Colton

Créé par: BrianLeeHOF
Équipe: 2023-24 Lightning de Tampa Bay
Date de création initiale: 29 avr. 2023
Publié: 29 avr. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2850 000 $
1850 000 $
1850 000 $
1850 000 $
42 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2850 000 $
21 000 000 $
1900 000 $
21 250 000 $
21 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Colton, Ross [Droits de RFA]
2.
TBL
    Future considerations
    ARI
    1. Seabrook, Brent
    2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (TBL)
    Rachats de contrats
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2023
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de ANA
    2024
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    2025
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2283 500 000 $82 537 500 $0 $850 000 $962 500 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
    C, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
    AG, C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 8
    850 000 $850 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
    C, AG
    NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AD, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    900 000 $900 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    5 200 000 $5 200 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 8
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    762 500 $762 500 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    850 000 $850 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    850 000 $850 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    29 avr. 2023 à 10 h 50
    #1
    VAN
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2022
    Messages: 6,194
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,884
    If you bring Pod into the equation it becomes just Pod. Kid is still 21.
    29 avr. 2023 à 10 h 53
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2017
    Messages: 458
    Mentions "j'aime": 79
    Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
    If you bring Pod into the equation it becomes just Pod. Kid is still 21.


    Nah, I think I would do that deal. Sell on Podz' potential rather than risk him becoming another Virtanen or Gaudette.
    29 avr. 2023 à 10 h 56
    #3
    VAN
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2022
    Messages: 6,194
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,884
    Quoting: gordfish
    Nah, I think I would do that deal. Sell on Podz' potential rather than risk him becoming another Virtanen or Gaudette.


    There is no way both of those guys get shipped in a two for one. I agree if Van is going to continue to play Pod 8 mins a night and give him no opportunities, then why keep him over adding someone like Colton to play 3C? But not for both.
    29 avr. 2023 à 11 h 14
    #4
    Seiders on the Storm
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2020
    Messages: 9,890
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,764
    Not re-signing UFA Killorn will give Tampa enough cap space to re-sign Colton. Cole isn't taking that AAV to stay in Tampa. He made 3 mil last season and good UFA D are always in demand.
    29 avr. 2023 à 11 h 18
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2017
    Messages: 458
    Mentions "j'aime": 79
    Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
    There is no way both of those guys get shipped in a two for one. I agree if Van is going to continue to play Pod 8 mins a night and give him no opportunities, then why keep him over adding someone like Colton to play 3C? But not for both.


    With the offers Tampa gets for him, I don't think you'll get him for Podz straight up, unless the Bolts REALLY like him. I think Podz' development really suffered in the K, and I'm not sure I see him even reaching Colton's level now, even with the ice time. My only real concern with Colton is he's not right handed.

    But Colton fits a need, if the playoffs are where they want to be next year, IMO you make the deal for the player you know can fill a role on your team rather than waiting on the potential of B prospects.
    Prime_Jimbo a aimé ceci.
    29 avr. 2023 à 11 h 36
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2022
    Messages: 2,819
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,024
    Modifié 29 avr. 2023 à 11 h 49
    Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
    There is no way both of those guys get shipped in a two for one. I agree if Van is going to continue to play Pod 8 mins a night and give him no opportunities, then why keep him over adding someone like Colton to play 3C? But not for both.


    Rather keep him anyway as I said about Palat last year if Killorn was going to take a stupid cheap offer he'd already walked into JBB's office and signed it. Colton will be a 30+ goal scorer playing 17 mpg with top 6 guys
    Prime_Jimbo a aimé ceci.
    29 avr. 2023 à 11 h 56
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 7,902
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,399
    Not at that price
    theleano1 a aimé ceci.
    29 avr. 2023 à 11 h 56
    #8
    PDG over PDO
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2020
    Messages: 5,083
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,121
    Canucks pass
    29 avr. 2023 à 12 h 26
    #9
    Ex Nucks fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 17,615
    Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
    Not worth it for the Canucks. Colton is not THAT good. Basically just like Garland type of player when the Canucks traded for him.
    29 avr. 2023 à 14 h 9
    #10
    VAN
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2022
    Messages: 6,194
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,884
    Quoting: gordfish
    With the offers Tampa gets for him, I don't think you'll get him for Podz straight up, unless the Bolts REALLY like him. I think Podz' development really suffered in the K, and I'm not sure I see him even reaching Colton's level now, even with the ice time. My only real concern with Colton is he's not right handed.

    But Colton fits a need, if the playoffs are where they want to be next year, IMO you make the deal for the player you know can fill a role on your team rather than waiting on the potential of B prospects.


    Podz was pretty solid his rookie year then the Canucks wanted to spend like wild on wingers. I agree, if the Canucks FO wants to push, go for it all the way. I'd be okay with parting with one.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage