I appreciate the poetry and the frustration nonetheless.

We have a mandate to limit (preferably to reduce to zero) the kind of posts that feature anything along the lines of McDavid for 100 draft picks or Crosby+Malkin+Letang for a fourth line grinder (Pittsburgh adds of course) simply because we've gotten enough feedback from the userbase that they want better AGMs in that section. We unfortunately have to adopt an element of "Fun Police" in order to meet that request. Is there anything inherently evil with your AGM that ended up deleted? No, but until we have an alternative section (which I'm pushing for incredibly hard because I don't want to be part of the Fun Police), we have to delete, warn, and/or infract the users that continue to post these kinds of AGMs.

This above post (just as an example) still falls shy of realism. Until we have the resources to provide yourself and similar users their own personal funhouse, the moderators and I are going to continue to do as we've been asked by the userbase and delete the really far-fetched posts.

Here's the thing though, I'm not purposefully rigging up trades that look as egregious as you're describing. This is the sort of escapism that I enjoy thinking about, like what if some wacky 32-way trade went down? Or what if a GM rapped their entire trade proposal to another GM? I used to sh*tpost because I was in a weird headspace, but what I'm posting now is using an approach that uses more creative and extrapolatory components to them. Moreover, the onus is not on me if others allegedly have their own opinion on what I post. If they don't care for it, why bother with it?

uh yeh drop the beat